Clinical evaluation of a new set of image quality criteria for mammography

被引:16
|
作者
Grahn, A [1 ]
Hemdal, B
Andersson, I
Ruschin, M
Thilander-Klang, A
Börjesson, S
Tingberg, A
Mattsson, S
Håkansson, M
Båth, M
Månsson, LG
Medin, J
Warmingerl, F
Panzer, W
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Malmo Univ Hosp, Dept Med Radiat Phys, S-20502 Malmo, Sweden
[2] Lund Univ, Malmo Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost Radiol, S-20502 Malmo, Sweden
[3] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Med Phys & Biomed Engn, S-41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
[4] GSF, Natl Res Ctr Environm & Hlth, Inst Radiat Protect, D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1093/rpd/nch573
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The European Commission (EC) quality criteria for screen-film mammography are used as a tool to assess image quality. A new set of criteria was developed and initially tested in a previous study. In the present study, these criteria are further evaluated using screen-film mammograms that have been digitised, manipulated to simulate different image quality levels and reprinted on film. Expert radiologists have evaluated these manipulated images using both the original (EC) and the new criteria. A comparison of three different simulated dose levels reveals that the new criteria yield a larger separation of image criteria scores than the old ones. These results indicate that the new set of image quality criteria has a higher discriminative power than the old set and thus seems to be more suitable for evaluation of image quality in mammography.
引用
收藏
页码:389 / 394
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Data set size and image quality in diffuse optical mammography: evaluation of a clinical prototype
    Culver, JP
    Ntziachristos, V
    Zubkov, L
    Durduran, T
    Pattanayak, DN
    Yodh, AG
    BIOMEDICAL TOPICAL MEETINGS, TECHNICAL DIGEST, 2000, 38 : 392 - 394
  • [2] A review of methods of clinical image quality evaluation in mammography
    Li, Yanpeng
    Poulos, Ann
    McLeana, Donald
    Rickard, Mary
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2010, 74 (03) : E123 - E132
  • [3] Mammography image quality: Analysis of evaluation criteria using pectoral muscle presentation
    Bentley, Kelly
    Poulos, Ann
    Rickard, Mary
    RADIOGRAPHY, 2008, 14 (03) : 189 - 194
  • [4] Whole-breast digital mammography: Evaluation of clinical image quality
    Feig, SA
    Yaffe, MJ
    Plewes, DB
    Piccaro, MF
    Jong, RA
    RADIOLOGY, 1996, 201 : 1300 - 1300
  • [5] EVALUATION OF MAMMOGRAPHY IMAGE QUALITY PHANTOMS
    YOUNG, KC
    RAMSDALE, ML
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 1993, 49 (1-3) : 171 - 173
  • [6] Clinical image quality criteria for full field digital mammography: A first practical application
    Van Ongeval, Chantal
    Van Steen, Andre
    Geniets, Catherine
    Dekeyzer, Frederik
    Bosmans, Hilde
    Marchal, Guy
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2008, 129 (1-3) : 265 - 270
  • [7] Digital Mammography: Clinical Image Evaluation
    Bassett, Lawrence W.
    Hoyt, Anne C.
    Oshiro, Thomas
    RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2010, 48 (05) : 903 - +
  • [9] Evaluation of image quality in mammography in the capital Brazil
    Corrêa, R
    Silver, L
    Dias, C
    Peixoto, J
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (06) : 1236 - 1236
  • [10] The impact of subjective image quality evaluation in mammography
    Alukic, E.
    Homar, K.
    Pavic, M.
    Zibert, J.
    Mekis, N.
    RADIOGRAPHY, 2023, 29 (03) : 526 - 532