Machine Learning-based Texture Analysis of Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging to Differentiate between Glioblastoma and Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma

被引:42
|
作者
Kunimatsu, Akira [1 ,2 ]
Kunimatsu, Natsuko [3 ]
Yasakau, Koichiro [1 ,2 ]
Akai, Hiroyuki [1 ,2 ]
Kamiya, Kouhei [2 ]
Watadani, Takeyuki [4 ]
Mori, Harushi [5 ]
Abe, Osamu [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, IMSUT Hosp, Inst Med Sci, Dept Radiol,Minato Ku, 4-6-1 Shirokanedai, Tokyo 1088639, Japan
[2] Univ Tokyo Hosp, Dept Radiol, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Int Univ Hlth & Welf, Mita Hosp, Dept Radiol, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Univ Tokyo, Fac Med, Dept Radiol, Tokyo, Japan
[5] Univ Tokyo, Grad Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
classification; glioblastoma; magnetic resonance imaging; primary central nervous system lymphoma; support vector machine; CLASSIFICATION; DIFFUSION; FEATURES; RELIABILITY; MICROARRAY; PREDICTION; PERFUSION; ARCHIVES; TUMORS; BRAIN;
D O I
10.2463/mrms.mp.2017-0178
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Although advanced MRI techniques are increasingly available, imaging differentiation between glioblastoma and primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is sometimes confusing. We aimed to evaluate the performance of image classification by support vector machine, a method of traditional machine learning, using texture features computed from contrast-enhanced T-1-weighted images. Methods: This retrospective study on preoperative brain tumor MRI included 76 consecutives, initially treated patients with glioblastoma (n = 55) or PCNSL (n = 21) from one institution, consisting of independent training group (n = 60: 44 glioblastomas and 16 PCNSLs) and test group (n = 16: 11 glioblastomas and 5 PCNSLs) sequentially separated by time periods. A total set of 67 texture features was computed on routine contrast-enhanced T-1-weighted images of the training group, and the top four most discriminating features were selected as input variables to train support vector machine classifiers. These features were then evaluated on the test group with subsequent image classification. Results: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves on the training data was calculated at 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.96-1.00) for the classifier with a Gaussian kernel and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.77-0.95) for the classifier with a linear kernel. On the test data, both of the classifiers showed prediction accuracy of 75% (12/16) of the test images. Conclusions: Although further improvement is needed, our preliminary results suggest that machine learning-based image classification may provide complementary diagnostic information on routine brain MM.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 52
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Classifying primary central nervous system lymphoma from glioblastoma using deep learning and radiomics based machine learning approach-a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Guha, Amrita
    Goda, Jayant S.
    Dasgupta, Archya
    Mahajan, Abhishek
    Halder, Soutik
    Gawde, Jeetendra
    Talole, Sanjay
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [42] MRI-Based Machine Learning for Prediction of Clinical Outcomes in Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma
    Ko, Ching-Chung
    Liu, Yan-Lin
    Hung, Kuo-Chuan
    Yang, Cheng-Chun
    Lim, Sher-Wei
    Yeh, Lee-Ren
    Chen, Jeon-Hor
    Su, Min-Ying
    LIFE-BASEL, 2024, 14 (10):
  • [43] Radiomics-based differentiation between glioblastoma and primary central nervous system lymphoma: a comparison of diagnostic performance across different MRI sequences and machine learning techniques
    Girish Bathla
    Sarv Priya
    Yanan Liu
    Caitlin Ward
    Nam H. Le
    Neetu Soni
    Ravishankar Pillenahalli Maheshwarappa
    Varun Monga
    Honghai Zhang
    Milan Sonka
    European Radiology, 2021, 31 : 8703 - 8713
  • [44] Radiomics-based differentiation between glioblastoma and primary central nervous system lymphoma: a comparison of diagnostic performance across different MRI sequences and machine learning techniques
    Bathla, Girish
    Priya, Sarv
    Liu, Yanan
    Ward, Caitlin
    Le, Nam H.
    Soni, Neetu
    Maheshwarappa, Ravishankar Pillenahalli
    Monga, Varun
    Zhang, Honghai
    Sonka, Milan
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (11) : 8703 - 8713
  • [45] Machine learning for semiautomated classification of glioblastoma, brain metastasis and central nervous system lymphoma using magnetic resonance advanced imaging
    Swinburne, Nathaniel C.
    Schefflein, Javin
    Sakai, Yu
    Oermann, Eric Karl
    Titano, Joseph J.
    Chen, Iris
    Tadayon, Sayedhedayatollah
    Aggarwal, Amit
    Doshi, Amish
    Nael, Kambiz
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2019, 7 (11)
  • [46] Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and 1H-Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Distinguish Primary Central Nervous System Vasculitis from Glioblastoma
    Kawazoe, Yushi
    Ohba, Shigeo
    Murayama, Kazuhiro
    Nakae, Shunsuke
    Nishiyama, Yuya
    Abe, Masato
    Hasegawa, Mitsuhiro
    Hirose, Yuichi
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 158 : E820 - E828
  • [47] Lymphomatosis cerebri: a rare variant of primary central nervous system lymphoma and MR imaging features
    Yu, Hui
    Gao, Bo
    Liu, Jing
    Yu, Yong-Cheng
    Shiroishi, Mark S.
    Huang, Ming-Ming
    Yang, Wen-Xiu
    Guan, Zhi-Zhong
    CANCER IMAGING, 2017, 17
  • [48] Lymphomatosis cerebri: a rare variant of primary central nervous system lymphoma and MR imaging features
    Hui Yu
    Bo Gao
    Jing Liu
    Yong-Cheng Yu
    Mark S. Shiroishi
    Ming-Ming Huang
    Wen-Xiu Yang
    Zhi-Zhong Guan
    Cancer Imaging, 17
  • [49] Prediction of radiosensitivity in primary central nervous system germ cell tumors using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Feng, Chenlu
    Gao, Peiyi
    Qiu, Xiaoguang
    Qian, Tianyi
    Lin, Yan
    Zhou, Jian
    Sui, Binbin
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 27 (03) : 231 - 238
  • [50] Prediction of radiosensitivity in primary central nervous system germ cell tumors using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Chenlu Feng
    Peiyi Gao
    Xiaoguang Qiu
    Tianyi Qian
    Yan Lin
    Jian Zhou
    Binbin Sui
    Chinese Journal of Cancer Research, 2015, 27 (03) : 231 - 238