Machine Learning-based Texture Analysis of Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging to Differentiate between Glioblastoma and Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma

被引:42
|
作者
Kunimatsu, Akira [1 ,2 ]
Kunimatsu, Natsuko [3 ]
Yasakau, Koichiro [1 ,2 ]
Akai, Hiroyuki [1 ,2 ]
Kamiya, Kouhei [2 ]
Watadani, Takeyuki [4 ]
Mori, Harushi [5 ]
Abe, Osamu [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, IMSUT Hosp, Inst Med Sci, Dept Radiol,Minato Ku, 4-6-1 Shirokanedai, Tokyo 1088639, Japan
[2] Univ Tokyo Hosp, Dept Radiol, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Int Univ Hlth & Welf, Mita Hosp, Dept Radiol, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Univ Tokyo, Fac Med, Dept Radiol, Tokyo, Japan
[5] Univ Tokyo, Grad Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
classification; glioblastoma; magnetic resonance imaging; primary central nervous system lymphoma; support vector machine; CLASSIFICATION; DIFFUSION; FEATURES; RELIABILITY; MICROARRAY; PREDICTION; PERFUSION; ARCHIVES; TUMORS; BRAIN;
D O I
10.2463/mrms.mp.2017-0178
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Although advanced MRI techniques are increasingly available, imaging differentiation between glioblastoma and primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is sometimes confusing. We aimed to evaluate the performance of image classification by support vector machine, a method of traditional machine learning, using texture features computed from contrast-enhanced T-1-weighted images. Methods: This retrospective study on preoperative brain tumor MRI included 76 consecutives, initially treated patients with glioblastoma (n = 55) or PCNSL (n = 21) from one institution, consisting of independent training group (n = 60: 44 glioblastomas and 16 PCNSLs) and test group (n = 16: 11 glioblastomas and 5 PCNSLs) sequentially separated by time periods. A total set of 67 texture features was computed on routine contrast-enhanced T-1-weighted images of the training group, and the top four most discriminating features were selected as input variables to train support vector machine classifiers. These features were then evaluated on the test group with subsequent image classification. Results: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves on the training data was calculated at 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.96-1.00) for the classifier with a Gaussian kernel and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.77-0.95) for the classifier with a linear kernel. On the test data, both of the classifiers showed prediction accuracy of 75% (12/16) of the test images. Conclusions: Although further improvement is needed, our preliminary results suggest that machine learning-based image classification may provide complementary diagnostic information on routine brain MM.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 52
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Distinguishing Tumefactive Demyelinating Lesions from Glioma or Central Nervous System Lymphoma: Added Value of Unenhanced CT Compared with Conventional Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging
    Kim, Dae Sik
    Na, Dong Gyu
    Kim, Keon Ha
    Kim, Ji-hoon
    Kim, Eunhee
    La Yun, Bo
    Chang, Kee-Hyun
    RADIOLOGY, 2009, 251 (02) : 467 - 475
  • [32] Primary lymphoma of the central nervous system: Typical and atypical CT and MR imaging appearances
    Erdag, N
    Bhorade, RM
    Alberico, RA
    Yousuf, N
    Patel, MR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 176 (05) : 1319 - 1326
  • [33] Deep learning for image classification between primary central nervous system lymphoma and glioblastoma in corpus callosal tumors
    Jaruenpunyasak, Jermphiphut
    Duangsoithong, Rakkrit
    Tunthanathip, Thara
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCES IN RURAL PRACTICE, 2023, 14 (03) : 470 - 476
  • [34] Diagnostic utility of intravoxel incoherent motion mr imaging in differentiating primary central nervous system lymphoma from glioblastoma multiforme
    Yamashita, Koji
    Hiwatashi, Akio
    Togao, Osamu
    Kikuchi, Kazufumi
    Kitamura, Yoshiyuki
    Mizoguchi, Masahiro
    Yoshimoto, Koji
    Kuga, Daisuke
    Suzuki, Satoshi O.
    Baba, Shingo
    Isoda, Takuro
    Iwaki, Toru
    Iihara, Koji
    Honda, Hiroshi
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2016, 44 (05) : 1256 - 1261
  • [35] Malignancy Characterization of Hepatocellular Carcinomas Based on Texture Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced MR Images
    Zhou, Wu
    Zhang, Lijuan
    Wang, Kaixin
    Chen, Shuting
    Wang, Guangyi
    Liu, Zaiyi
    Liang, Changhong
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2017, 45 (05) : 1476 - 1484
  • [36] Differentiation of Primary Central Nervous System Lymphomas and Glioblastomas: Comparisons of Diagnostic Performance of Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MR Imaging without and with Contrast-Leakage Correction
    Toh, C. H.
    Wei, K. -C.
    Chang, C. -N.
    Ng, S. -H.
    Wong, H. -F.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2013, 34 (06) : 1145 - 1149
  • [37] Pretreatment dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI biomarkers correlate with progression-free survival in primary central nervous system lymphoma
    Vaios Hatzoglou
    Jung Hun Oh
    Olivia Buck
    Xuling Lin
    Michelle Lee
    Amita Shukla-Dave
    Robert J. Young
    Kyung K. Peck
    Behroze Vachha
    Andrei I. Holodny
    Christian Grommes
    Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 2018, 140 : 351 - 358
  • [38] Pretreatment dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI biomarkers correlate with progression-free survival in primary central nervous system lymphoma
    Hatzoglou, Vaios
    Oh, Jung Hun
    Buck, Olivia
    Lin, Xuling
    Lee, Michelle
    Shukla-Dave, Amita
    Young, Robert J.
    Peck, Kyung K.
    Vachha, Behroze
    Holodny, Andrei I.
    Grommes, Christian
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2018, 140 (02) : 351 - 358
  • [39] MR imaging based fractal analysis for differentiating primary CNS lymphoma and glioblastoma
    Shuai Liu
    Xing Fan
    Chuanbao Zhang
    Zheng Wang
    Shaowu Li
    Yinyan Wang
    Xiaoguang Qiu
    Tao Jiang
    European Radiology, 2019, 29 : 1348 - 1354
  • [40] MR imaging based fractal analysis for differentiating primary CNS lymphoma and glioblastoma
    Liu, Shuai
    Fan, Xing
    Zhang, Chuanbao
    Wang, Zheng
    Li, Shaowu
    Wang, Yinyan
    Qiu, Xiaoguang
    Jiang, Tao
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (03) : 1348 - 1354