Prostate cancer radiotherapy dose response: An update of the fox chase experience

被引:110
|
作者
Pollack, A
Hanlon, AL
Horwitz, EM
Feigenberg, SJ
Uzzo, RG
Hanks, GE
机构
[1] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
[2] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
[3] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Dept Urol, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2004年 / 171卷 / 03期
关键词
prostate; prostatic neoplasms; radiotherapy; dose-response relationship; radiation;
D O I
10.1097/01.ju.0000111844.95024.74
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: The effectiveness of increasing radiotherapy dose for men with prostate cancer was evaluated With reference to prognostic groups as defined by pretreatment serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score, T stage and perineural invasion. Materials and Methods: There were 839 men treated between April 1989 and December 1997 with conformal radiotherapy alone. Cox multivariate analysis was used to establish important predictors of biochemical failure (BF) separately for patients with an initial pretreatment PSA (iPSA) of less than 10, 10 to 19.9, or 20 or greater ng/ml. Radiotherapy (RT) dose was evaluated as a continuous and categorical (dose groups of less than 72, 72 to 75.9 and 76 Gy or greater) variable. Results: At a median 63-month followup multivariate analysis demonstrated that iPSA and radiotherapy (RP) dose were the most significant predictors of BF, followed by Gleason score and T stage. Perineural invasion was not an independent correlate of outcome. RT dose was significant in all iPSA groups (less than 10, 10 to 19.9 and 20 or greater ng/ml). Gleason score was significant when iPSA was less than 10 ng/ml. T stage was significant when iPSA was 20 ng/ml or greater and it was borderline when iPSA was 10 to 19.9 ng/ml (p = 0.08). Prognostic subgroups were derived from these results and tested for an effect of RT dose on univariate analysis. Radiation dose was not a correlate of BF in the most favorable (PSA less than 10 ng/ml and Gleason score 2 to 6) and the most unfavorable (PSA 20 ng/ml or greater and stage T3-T4) prognostic groups but it was otherwise an influential determinant of outcome. Conclusions: RT dose escalation to 76 Gy or greater improved patient outcome for all prognostic groups except those at the favorable and unfavorable extremes.
引用
收藏
页码:1132 / 1136
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Defining a dose-response relationship with radiotherapy for prostate cancer: Is more really better?
    Vicini, FA
    Abner, A
    Baglan, KL
    Kestin, LL
    Martinez, AA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 51 (05): : 1200 - 1208
  • [32] Dose-response in external-beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer: the evidence grows
    Hsi, R. Alex
    Corman, John
    NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE UROLOGY, 2007, 4 (01): : 18 - 19
  • [33] CONFORMAL DOSE ESCALATED RADIOTHERAPY TREATMENT FOR PROSTATE CANCER-A SINGLE INSTITUTE EXPERIENCE.
    Alam, F.
    Malik, Z.
    Wong, H.
    Eswar, C.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2008, 88 : S317 - S317
  • [34] RADIOTHERAPY FOR RECTAL-CANCER - AN UPDATE OF THE JEFFERSON EXPERIENCE
    MOHIUDDIN, M
    MARKS, G
    KRAMER, S
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1981, 7 (09): : 1206 - 1206
  • [35] Gregory Enders joins Fox Chase Cancer Center
    Mallet, Karen
    CANCER BIOLOGY & THERAPY, 2007, 6 (02) : 138 - 139
  • [36] Bernard Fisher speaks at Fox Chase Cancer Center
    不详
    ONCOLOGY-NEW YORK, 1998, 12 (01): : 20 - 20
  • [37] Dose response relationship of radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: Results from a Canadian Provincial Cancer Registry
    Tai, P.
    Skarsgard, D.
    Alvi, R.
    Tonita, J.
    Woitas, C.
    Joseph, K.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2006, 80 : S11 - S11
  • [38] Salvage radiotherapy for rising prostate specific antigen after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: Dose response analysis
    Buskirk, S. J.
    Pisansky, T. M.
    Schild, S. E.
    Macdonald, O. K.
    Wong, W. W.
    Kozelsky, T. F.
    Heckman, M. G.
    Crook, J. E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 66 (03): : S322 - S322
  • [39] Clinically Derived Dose-Response Relations for Prostate from Combined Photon and Proton Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy
    Mavroidis, P.
    Valianti, C.
    Boumpoutsi, I.
    Isacsson, U.
    Johansson, S.
    Montelius, A.
    Papanikolaou, N.
    Sakellaropoulos, G.
    Nikiforidis, G.
    Turesson, I.
    Lind, B.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06)
  • [40] Stability of tumor biomarkers in archival tissue from men treated with radiotherapy for prostate cancer: An analysis of RTOG 92-02 and Fox Chase randomized trials
    Pollack, A.
    Bae, K.
    Khor, L.-Y
    Hammond, M. E.
    Al-Saleem, T.
    Hachem, P.
    Li, L.
    Hanks, G. E.
    Sandler, H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL MARKERS, 2007, 22 (01): : 72 - 73