Prostate cancer radiotherapy dose response: An update of the fox chase experience

被引:110
|
作者
Pollack, A
Hanlon, AL
Horwitz, EM
Feigenberg, SJ
Uzzo, RG
Hanks, GE
机构
[1] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
[2] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
[3] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Dept Urol, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2004年 / 171卷 / 03期
关键词
prostate; prostatic neoplasms; radiotherapy; dose-response relationship; radiation;
D O I
10.1097/01.ju.0000111844.95024.74
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: The effectiveness of increasing radiotherapy dose for men with prostate cancer was evaluated With reference to prognostic groups as defined by pretreatment serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score, T stage and perineural invasion. Materials and Methods: There were 839 men treated between April 1989 and December 1997 with conformal radiotherapy alone. Cox multivariate analysis was used to establish important predictors of biochemical failure (BF) separately for patients with an initial pretreatment PSA (iPSA) of less than 10, 10 to 19.9, or 20 or greater ng/ml. Radiotherapy (RT) dose was evaluated as a continuous and categorical (dose groups of less than 72, 72 to 75.9 and 76 Gy or greater) variable. Results: At a median 63-month followup multivariate analysis demonstrated that iPSA and radiotherapy (RP) dose were the most significant predictors of BF, followed by Gleason score and T stage. Perineural invasion was not an independent correlate of outcome. RT dose was significant in all iPSA groups (less than 10, 10 to 19.9 and 20 or greater ng/ml). Gleason score was significant when iPSA was less than 10 ng/ml. T stage was significant when iPSA was 20 ng/ml or greater and it was borderline when iPSA was 10 to 19.9 ng/ml (p = 0.08). Prognostic subgroups were derived from these results and tested for an effect of RT dose on univariate analysis. Radiation dose was not a correlate of BF in the most favorable (PSA less than 10 ng/ml and Gleason score 2 to 6) and the most unfavorable (PSA 20 ng/ml or greater and stage T3-T4) prognostic groups but it was otherwise an influential determinant of outcome. Conclusions: RT dose escalation to 76 Gy or greater improved patient outcome for all prognostic groups except those at the favorable and unfavorable extremes.
引用
收藏
页码:1132 / 1136
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Postoperative radiotherapy in prostate cancer: Dose and volumes
    Schick, U.
    Latorzeff, I
    Sargos, P.
    CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE, 2021, 25 (6-7): : 674 - 678
  • [22] Radiotherapy dose in the treatment of localized prostate cancer
    Kalkner, Karl Mikael
    ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 168 (12) : 1352 - 1353
  • [23] The impact of dose escalated radiotherapy for prostate cancer
    Staffurth, J.
    Mason, M.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 19 (03) : S15 - S15
  • [24] Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer: an update
    Fuks, Z.
    EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2005, 3 (02): : 32 - 32
  • [25] miRNAs and radiotherapy response in prostate cancer
    Konoshenko, Maria Yu
    Bryzgunova, Olga E.
    Laktionov, Pavel P.
    ANDROLOGY, 2021, 9 (02) : 529 - 545
  • [26] Comparison of RapidArc vs. Fixed Beam IMRT for Treatment of Prostate Cancer at Fox Chase Cancer Center
    Price, R.
    Cherian, G.
    Horwitz, E.
    Wang, L.
    Ma, C.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06)
  • [27] Resection of isolated pelvic recurrences after colorectal surgery - the Fox Chase Cancer Center experience
    Henry, LR
    Sigurdson, E
    Ross, EA
    Freedman, GM
    Konski, A
    Hoffman, JP
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 126 (04) : A788 - A788
  • [28] Molecular profiling of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs): The Fox Chase Cancer Center (FCCC) experience.
    Vijayvergia, Namrata
    Boland, Patrick McKay
    Cohen, Steven J.
    Gustafson, Karen S.
    Cooper, Harry S.
    Astsaturov, Igor A.
    Engstrom, Paul F.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (03)
  • [29] Patient experience preparing for prostate cancer radiotherapy
    Alexander, S. E.
    Selous-Hodges, J.
    Araujo, A.
    Booth, L.
    Delacroix, L.
    Garrad, E.
    Gordon, A.
    Graham, C.
    Guerra, A.
    Gulyaeva, C.
    Ockwell, C.
    Shire, S.
    Oelfke, U.
    Mcnair, H. A.
    Tree, A. C.
    TECHNICAL INNOVATIONS & PATIENT SUPPORT IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2025, 33
  • [30] A Needs Assessment of Cancer Survivors at Fox Chase Cancer Center
    McIntosh, Bonnie
    Metz, Stacie
    Barsevick, Andrea
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2010, 9 (04): : 417 - 417