Mixed-initiative Variable Autonomy for Remotely Operated Mobile Robots

被引:21
|
作者
Chiou, Manolis [1 ]
Hawes, Nick [2 ,3 ]
Stolkin, Rustam [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Sch Met & Mat, Extreme Robot Lab, Elms Rd, Birmingham B15 2SE, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Oxford Robot Inst, Dept Engn Sci, Oxford, England
[3] Univ Oxford, Oxford Robot Inst, 23 Banbury Rd,Felstead House, Oxford OX2 6NN, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Mixed-initiative control; shared control; human-robot interaction; variable autonomy; conflict for control; URBAN SEARCH;
D O I
10.1145/3472206
中图分类号
TP24 [机器人技术];
学科分类号
080202 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This article presents an Expert-guided Mixed-initiative Control Switcher (EMICS) for remotely operated mobile robots. The EMICS enables switching between different levels of autonomy during task execution initiated by either the human operator and/or the EMICS. The EMICS is evaluated in two disaster-response-inspired experiments, one with a simulated robot and test arena, and one with a real robot in a realistic environment. Analyses from the two experiments provide evidence that: (a) Human-Initiative (HI) systems outperform systems with single modes of operation, such as pure teleoperation, in navigation tasks; (b) in the context of the simulated robot experiment, Mixed-initiative (MI) systems provide improved performance in navigation tasks, improved operator performance in cognitive demanding secondary tasks, and improved operator workload compared to HI. Last, our experiment on a physical robot provides empirical evidence that identify two major challenges for MI control: (a) the design of context-aware MI control systems; and (b) the conflict for control between the robot's MI control system and the operator. Insights regarding these challenges are discussed and ways to tackle them are proposed.
引用
收藏
页数:34
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Experimental Analysis of a Variable Autonomy Framework for Controlling a Remotely Operating Mobile Robot
    Chiou, Manolis
    Stolkin, Rustam
    Bieksaite, Goda
    Hawes, Nick
    Shapiro, Kimron L.
    Harrison, Timothy S.
    2016 IEEE/RSJ INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT ROBOTS AND SYSTEMS (IROS 2016), 2016, : 3581 - 3588
  • [32] Assessing Multimodal Interactions with Mixed-Initiative Teams
    Barber, Daniel
    HUMAN INTERFACE AND THE MANAGEMENT OF INFORMATION: INTERACTION, VISUALIZATION, AND ANALYTICS, HIMI 2018 HELD AS PART OF HCI 2018, PART I, 2018, 10904 : 175 - 184
  • [33] Towards mixed-initiative interactions in novice programming
    Rao, Shilpi
    Doherty, Liam
    Kumar, Vive
    7TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, : 822 - +
  • [34] Mixed-initiative planning in space mission operations
    Bresina, John L.
    Morris, Paul H.
    AI MAGAZINE, 2007, 28 (02) : 75 - 88
  • [35] Mixed-Initiative Friend-List Creation
    Bacon, Kelli
    Dewan, Prasun
    ECSCW 2011: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK, 2011, : 293 - 312
  • [36] Mixed-Initiative Nested Classification by Optimal Thresholding
    Hyun, Baro
    Faied, Mariam
    Kabamba, Pierre
    Girard, Anouck
    2011 50TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL AND EUROPEAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (CDC-ECC), 2011, : 7653 - 7658
  • [37] Mixed-initiative systems for collaborative problem solving
    Ferguson, George
    Allen, James
    AI MAGAZINE, 2007, 28 (02) : 23 - 32
  • [38] Telelocomotion-Remotely Operated Legged Robots
    Huang, Kevin
    Subedi, Divas
    Mitra, Rahul
    Yung, Isabella
    Boyd, Kirkland
    Aldrich, Edwin
    Chitrakar, Digesh
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (01): : 1 - 20
  • [39] Mixed-initiative management of dynamic business processes
    Rubinstein, ZB
    Corkill, DD
    SMCIA/03: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2003 IEEE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON SOFT COMPUTING IN INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS, 2003, : 39 - 44
  • [40] Mixed-initiative problem solving with decision trees
    David McSherry
    Artificial Intelligence Review, 2007, 28 : 17 - 33