Mixed-initiative Variable Autonomy for Remotely Operated Mobile Robots

被引:21
|
作者
Chiou, Manolis [1 ]
Hawes, Nick [2 ,3 ]
Stolkin, Rustam [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Sch Met & Mat, Extreme Robot Lab, Elms Rd, Birmingham B15 2SE, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Oxford Robot Inst, Dept Engn Sci, Oxford, England
[3] Univ Oxford, Oxford Robot Inst, 23 Banbury Rd,Felstead House, Oxford OX2 6NN, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Mixed-initiative control; shared control; human-robot interaction; variable autonomy; conflict for control; URBAN SEARCH;
D O I
10.1145/3472206
中图分类号
TP24 [机器人技术];
学科分类号
080202 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This article presents an Expert-guided Mixed-initiative Control Switcher (EMICS) for remotely operated mobile robots. The EMICS enables switching between different levels of autonomy during task execution initiated by either the human operator and/or the EMICS. The EMICS is evaluated in two disaster-response-inspired experiments, one with a simulated robot and test arena, and one with a real robot in a realistic environment. Analyses from the two experiments provide evidence that: (a) Human-Initiative (HI) systems outperform systems with single modes of operation, such as pure teleoperation, in navigation tasks; (b) in the context of the simulated robot experiment, Mixed-initiative (MI) systems provide improved performance in navigation tasks, improved operator performance in cognitive demanding secondary tasks, and improved operator workload compared to HI. Last, our experiment on a physical robot provides empirical evidence that identify two major challenges for MI control: (a) the design of context-aware MI control systems; and (b) the conflict for control between the robot's MI control system and the operator. Insights regarding these challenges are discussed and ways to tackle them are proposed.
引用
收藏
页数:34
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Trust-Based Mixed-Initiative Teleoperation of Mobile Robots
    Saeidi, H.
    McLane, F.
    Sadrfaidpour, B.
    Sand, E.
    Fu, S.
    Rodriguez, J.
    Wagner, J. R.
    Wang, Y.
    2016 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ACC), 2016, : 6177 - 6182
  • [2] Dimensions of adjustable autonomy and mixed-initiative interaction
    Bradshaw, JM
    Feltovich, PJ
    Jung, H
    Kulkarni, S
    Taysom, W
    Uszok, A
    AGENTS AND COMPUTATIONAL AUTONOMY: POTENTIAL, RISKS, AND SOLUTIONS, 2004, 2969 : 17 - 39
  • [3] Mixed-initiative interaction
    Hearst, M
    IEEE INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS & THEIR APPLICATIONS, 1999, 14 (05): : 14 - 16
  • [4] Mixed-Initiative News Video Recommendations and Browsing for Mobile Devices
    Lee, Jeannie S. A.
    Jayant, Nikil
    2009 IEEE THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SEMANTIC COMPUTING (ICSC 2009), 2009, : 569 - 570
  • [5] Mixed-Initiative Flexible Autonomy in Drone Swarms for COVID-19 Applications
    Khopkar, Parth
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETY (ISTAS), 2021, : 457 - 461
  • [6] Seven aspects of mixed-initiative reasoning: An introduction to this special issue on mixed-initiative assistants
    Tecuci, Gheorghe
    Boicu, Mihai
    Cox, Michael T.
    AI MAGAZINE, 2007, 28 (02) : 11 - 18
  • [7] Mixed-initiative interaction = mixed computation
    Ramakrishnan, N
    Capra, R
    Pérez-Quiñones, MA
    ACM SIGPLAN NOTICES, 2002, 37 (03) : 119 - 130
  • [8] Mixed-initiative ontology learning
    Boicu, C
    Tecuci, G
    IC-AI '04 & MLMTA'04 , VOL 1 AND 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, : 745 - 751
  • [9] VFH plus based shared control for remotely operated mobile robots
    Pappas, Pantelis
    Chiou, Manolis
    Epsimos, Georgios-Theofanis
    Nikolaou, Grigoris
    Stolkin, Rustam
    2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SAFETY, SECURITY, AND RESCUE ROBOTICS (SSRR 2020), 2020, : 366 - 373
  • [10] Mixed-initiative goal manipulation
    Intelligent Distributing Computing Department, BBN Technologies, Cambridge, MA, United States
    不详
    AI Mag, 2007, 2 (62-73):