Strengths and Weaknesses of 1.5T and 3T MRS Data in Brain Glioma Classification

被引:11
|
作者
Kounelakis, M. G. [1 ]
Dimou, I. N. [1 ]
Zervakis, M. E. [1 ]
Tsougos, I. [2 ]
Tsolaki, E. [2 ]
Kousi, E. [2 ]
Kapsalaki, E. [2 ]
Theodorou, K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Crete, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Khania 73100, Greece
[2] Univ Thessaly, Dept Med Sci, Larisa 41110, Greece
关键词
Brain glioma discrimination; metabolic ratio markers; 1.5T and 3T magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) scanners; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-SPECTROSCOPY; TUMOR CLASSIFICATION; CEREBRAL GLIOMAS; ASTROCYTOMAS; EXPERIENCE; SPECTRA; LESIONS;
D O I
10.1109/TITB.2011.2131146
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Although magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) methods of 1.5Tesla (T) and 3T have been widely applied during the last decade for noninvasive diagnostic purposes, only a few studies have been reported on the value of the information extracted in brain cancer discrimination. The purpose of this study is threefold. First, to show that the diagnostic value of the information extracted from two different MRS scanners of 1.5T and 3T is significantly influenced in terms of brain gliomas discrimination. Second, to statistically evaluate the discriminative potential of publicly known metabolic ratio markers, obtained from these two types of scanners in classifying low-, intermediate-, and high-grade gliomas. Finally, to examine the diagnostic value of new metabolic ratios in the discrimination of complex glioma cases where the diagnosis is both challenging and critical. Our analysis has shown that although the information extracted from 3T MRS scanner is expected to provide better brain gliomas discrimination; some factors like the features selected, the pulse-sequence parameters, and the spectroscopic data acquisition methods can influence the discrimination efficiency. Finally, it is shown that apart from the bibliographical known, new metabolic ratio features such as N-acetyl aspartate/S, Choline/ S, Creatine/S, and myo-Inositol/S play significant role in gliomas grade discrimination.
引用
收藏
页码:647 / 654
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] What you Need to Know About MR Neuroimaging at 1.5T and 3T
    Tanenbaum, L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 194 (05)
  • [32] Comparison of 1.5T vs. 3T MRI of brain for target delineation in glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) patients
    Al-Dhaibani, N.
    Pervez, N.
    Stanescu, T.
    Fallone, G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 69 (03): : S653 - S653
  • [33] 7T MR of intracranial pathology: Preliminary observations and comparisons to 3T and 1.5T
    Obusez, Emmanuel C.
    Lowe, Mark
    Oh, Se-Hong
    Wang, Irene
    Bullen, Jennifer
    Ruggieri, Paul
    Hill, Virginia
    Lockwood, Daniel
    Emch, Todd
    Moon, Doksu
    Loy, Gareth
    Lee, Jonathan
    Kiczek, Matthew
    Massand, Manoj
    Statsevych, Volodymyr
    Stultz, Todd
    Jones, Stephen E.
    NEUROIMAGE, 2018, 168 : 459 - 476
  • [34] Difference in Number of Brain Metastases Detected using 1.5T and 3T MRI in Patients Treated with Stereotactic Radiosurgery
    Jensen, L. G.
    Nath, S. K.
    Murphy, K. T.
    Alksne, J. F.
    Mundt, A. J.
    Lawson, J. D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (02): : S300 - S300
  • [35] Compatibility between 3T 1H SV-MRS data and automatic brain tumour diagnosis support systems based on databases of 1.5T 1H SV-MRS spectra
    Fuster-Garcia, Elies
    Navarro, Clara
    Vicente, Javier
    Tortajada, Salvador
    Garcia-Gomez, Juan M.
    Saez, Carlos
    Calvar, Jorge
    Griffiths, John
    Julia-Sape, Margarida
    Howe, Franklyn A.
    Pujol, Jesus
    Peet, Andrew C.
    Heerschap, Arend
    Moreno-Torres, Angel
    Martinez-Bisbal, M. C.
    Martinez-Granados, Beatriz
    Wesseling, Pieter
    Semmler, Wolfhard
    Capellades, Jaume
    Majos, Carles
    Alberich-Bayarri, Angel
    Capdevila, Antoni
    Monleon, Daniel
    Marti-Bonmati, Luis
    Arus, Carles
    Celda, Bernardo
    Robles, Montserrat
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE MATERIALS IN PHYSICS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2011, 24 (01): : 35 - 42
  • [36] Compatibility between 3T 1H SV-MRS data and automatic brain tumour diagnosis support systems based on databases of 1.5T 1H SV-MRS spectra
    Elies Fuster-Garcia
    Clara Navarro
    Javier Vicente
    Salvador Tortajada
    Juan M. García-Gómez
    Carlos Sáez
    Jorge Calvar
    John Griffiths
    Margarida Julià-Sapé
    Franklyn A. Howe
    Jesús Pujol
    Andrew C. Peet
    Arend Heerschap
    Àngel Moreno-Torres
    M. C. Martínez-Bisbal
    Beatriz Martínez-Granados
    Pieter Wesseling
    Wolfhard Semmler
    Jaume Capellades
    Carles Majós
    Àngel Alberich-Bayarri
    Antoni Capdevila
    Daniel Monleón
    Luis Martí-Bonmatí
    Carles Arús
    Bernardo Celda
    Montserrat Robles
    Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine, 2011, 24 : 35 - 42
  • [37] Brain lesion classification using 3T MRS spectra and paired SVM kernels
    Dimou, Ioannis
    Tsougos, Ioannis
    Tsolaki, Evaggelia
    Kousi, Evanthia
    Kapsalaki, Eftychia
    Theodorou, Kyriaki
    Kounelakis, Michalis
    Zervakis, Michalis
    BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING AND CONTROL, 2011, 6 (03) : 314 - 320
  • [38] Comparison of 1.5T and 3T MRI scanners in evaluation of acute bone stress in the foot
    Sormaala, Markus J.
    Ruohola, Juha-Petri
    Mattila, Ville M.
    Koskinen, Seppo K.
    Pihlajamaki, Harri K.
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2011, 12
  • [39] MR Diagnosis of Bone Metastases at 1.5T and 3T: Can STIR Imaging Be Omitted?
    Ohlmann-Knafo, S.
    Tarnoki, A. D.
    Tarnoki, D. L.
    Pickuth, D.
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2015, 187 (10): : 924 - 932
  • [40] Comparison of 1.5T and 3T MRI scanners in evaluation of acute bone stress in the foot
    Markus J Sormaala
    Juha-Petri Ruohola
    Ville M Mattila
    Seppo K Koskinen
    Harri K Pihlajamäki
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 12