Evidence Check: knowledge brokering to commission research reviews for policy

被引：44
|
作者：
Campbell, Danielle [1 ]
Donald, Braedon [1 ]
Moore, Gabriel [1 ]
Frew, Deborah [1 ]
机构：
[1] Sax Inst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
来源：
EVIDENCE & POLICY | 2011年 / 7卷 / 01期
关键词：
synthesis; knowledge brokering; research utilisation; evidence-based policy; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; HEALTH; TIME;
D O I：
10.1332/174426411X553034
中图分类号：
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号：
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要：
Evidence Check, a programme managed by the Sax Institute in Sydney, Australia, assists Australian policy makers to commission quality reviews of research to inform health policy decision making. The programme involves an iterative knowledge brokering process to formulate and refine the scope of and questions for the review. The knowledge brokering process is particularly important to overcome barriers that have traditionally impeded the use of evidence in policy decision making by facilitating the creation of linkages and exchange between policy and researchers. Feedback from policy makers and researchers indicates that the use of knowledge brokers has enhanced the value of reviews commissioned through Evidence Check
引用
收藏
页码：97 / 107
页数：11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Brokering research in science education policy implementation: the case of a professional association
    Hopkins, Megan
    Wiley, Kathryn E.
    Penuel, William R.
    Farrell, Caitlin C.
    EVIDENCE & POLICY, 2018, 14 (03): : 459 - 476
  • [32] Academic knowledge brokering in local policy spaces: negotiating and implementing dynamic idea types
    Weakley, Sarah
    Waite, David
    EVIDENCE & POLICY, 2023, 19 (03): : 342 - 359
  • [33] Knowledge Brokering Repertoires: Academic Practices at Science-Policy Interfaces as an Epistemological Bricolage
    Bandola-Gill, Justyna
    MINERVA, 2023, 61 (01) : 71 - 92
  • [34] Knowledge Brokering Repertoires: Academic Practices at Science-Policy Interfaces as an Epistemological Bricolage
    Justyna Bandola-Gill
    Minerva, 2023, 61 : 71 - 92
  • [35] Do we need “more research” or better implementation through knowledge brokering?
    Janet G. Hering
    Sustainability Science, 2016, 11 : 363 - 369
  • [36] Do we need "more research" or better implementation through knowledge brokering?
    Hering, Janet G.
    SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2016, 11 (02) : 363 - 369
  • [37] Evidence and Policy Research
    Schuller, Tom
    Jochems, Wim
    Moos, Lejf
    Van Zanten, Agnes
    EUROPEAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2006, 5 (01): : 57 - 70
  • [38] Knowledge brokering: An innovative model for supporting evidence-informed practice in respiratory care
    Hoens, Alison M.
    Reid, W. Darlene
    Camp, Pat G.
    CANADIAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2013, 20 (04) : 271 - 274
  • [39] Evidence and Health Policy: Using and Regulating Systematic Reviews
    Fox, Daniel M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 107 (01) : 88 - 92
  • [40] Translating Evidence from Systematic Reviews for Policy Makers
    Nannini, Angela
    Houde, Susan Crocker
    JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGICAL NURSING, 2010, 36 (06): : 22 - 26
12345