Evidence Check: knowledge brokering to commission research reviews for policy

被引：44
|
作者：
Campbell, Danielle [1 ]
Donald, Braedon [1 ]
Moore, Gabriel [1 ]
Frew, Deborah [1 ]
机构：
[1] Sax Inst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
来源：
EVIDENCE & POLICY | 2011年 / 7卷 / 01期
关键词：
synthesis; knowledge brokering; research utilisation; evidence-based policy; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; HEALTH; TIME;
D O I：
10.1332/174426411X553034
中图分类号：
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号：
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要：
Evidence Check, a programme managed by the Sax Institute in Sydney, Australia, assists Australian policy makers to commission quality reviews of research to inform health policy decision making. The programme involves an iterative knowledge brokering process to formulate and refine the scope of and questions for the review. The knowledge brokering process is particularly important to overcome barriers that have traditionally impeded the use of evidence in policy decision making by facilitating the creation of linkages and exchange between policy and researchers. Feedback from policy makers and researchers indicates that the use of knowledge brokers has enhanced the value of reviews commissioned through Evidence Check
引用
收藏
页码：97 / 107
页数：11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Inside out: knowledge brokering by short-term policy placements
    Bruce, Ann
    O'Callaghan, Kenneth
    EVIDENCE & POLICY, 2016, 12 (03): : 363 - 380
  • [22] Evidence for policy making: Some reflections on the application of systematic reviews to housing research
    Wallace, A
    Croucher, K
    Bevan, M
    Jackson, K
    O'Malley, L
    Quilgars, D
    HOUSING STUDIES, 2006, 21 (02) : 297 - 314
  • [23] The ISSUES Project: An Example of Knowledge Brokering at the Research Programme Level
    Przybycien, Katarzyna
    Beckmann, Katherine
    Pratt, Kimberley
    Cooper, Annabel
    Crishna, Naeeda
    Jowitt, Paul
    INNOVATION THROUGH KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER 2010, 2011, 9 : 297 - 307
  • [24] Evidence maps and evidence gaps: evidence review mapping as a method for collating and appraising evidence reviews to inform research and policy
    O'Leary, Bethan C.
    Woodcock, Paul
    Kaiser, Michel J.
    Pullin, Andrew S.
    ENVIRONMENTAL EVIDENCE, 2017, 6 (01)
  • [25] Evidence maps and evidence gaps: evidence review mapping as a method for collating and appraising evidence reviews to inform research and policy
    Bethan C. O’Leary
    Paul Woodcock
    Michel J. Kaiser
    Andrew S. Pullin
    Environmental Evidence, 6
  • [26] Evidence reviews in energy and climate policy
    Warren, Peter
    EVIDENCE & POLICY, 2020, 16 (01): : 83 - 98
  • [27] New reviews of research evidence
    British Dental Journal, 2010, 208 (3) : 101 - 101
  • [28] Correction: Knowledge management for policy impact: the case of the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre
    Lene Topp
    David Mair
    Laura Smillie
    Paul Cairney
    Palgrave Communications, 4 (1)
  • [29] Knowledge brokering at the environmental science-policy interface - examining structure and activity
    Juhola, Sirkku
    Huotari, Essi
    Kolehmainen, Liisa
    Silfverberg, Outi
    Korhonen-Kurki, Kaisa
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2024, 153
  • [30] Making sense of knowledge-brokering organisations: boundary organisations or policy entrepreneurs?
    MacKillop, Eleanor
    Connell, Andrew
    Downe, James
    Durrant, Hannah
    SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2023, 50 (06) : 950 - 960
12345