Dinoprostone versus cervical ripening balloon for term nulliparous labor induction following primary Dinoprostone induction failure

被引：0
|
作者：
Lauterbach, Roy [1 ]
Ben David, Chen [2 ]
Siegler, Yoav [2 ]
Justman, Naphtali [2 ]
Bachar, Gal [3 ]
Vitner, Dana [4 ]
Ghanim, Nadier [2 ]
Beloosesky, Ron [5 ]
Weiner, Zeev [2 ]
Ginsberg, Yuval [5 ]
Khatib, Nizar [6 ]
机构：
[1] St Michaels Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Rambam Healthcare Campus, Haifa, Israel
[3] Rambam Healthcare Campus, Ramat Yishai, Israel
[4] Rambam Healthcare Campus, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Rambam Med Ctr, Haifa, Israel
[6] Rambam Healthcare Campus, Akko, Israel
来源：
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 2022年 / 226卷 / 01期
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号：
100211 ;
摘要：
985
引用
收藏
页码：S628 / S629
页数：2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Efficacy of Dinoprostone Vaginal Pessary for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labour
    Mamatha, C.
    Sarmishta, M.
    Dhanalakshmi, M. G.
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2021, 10 (12): : 873 - 877
  • [42] Induction of labor with intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone
    K. Özgür
    A. Kizilates
    M. Üner
    O. Erman
    B. Trak
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 1997, 261 : 9 - 13
  • [43] Oral misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for induction of labor
    Langenegger, EJ
    Odendaal, HJ
    Grové, D
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2005, 88 (03) : 242 - 248
  • [44] Retrospective comparison of effectiveness of balloon catheter versus dinoprostone for cervical ripening
    Baumont, M.
    Dap, M.
    Schweizer, C.
    Morel, O.
    Boukerrou, M.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE, 2021, 49 (09): : 660 - 664
  • [45] Comparison of the effectiveness and pregnancy outcomes of labor induction with dinoprostone or single-balloon catheter in term nulliparous women with borderline oligohydramnios
    Zhang, Yongqing
    Chen, Luping
    Yan, Guohui
    Zhou, Menglin
    Chen, Zhengyun
    Liang, Zhaoxia
    Chen, Danqing
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 135 (06) : 681 - 690
  • [46] Comparison of the effectiveness and pregnancy outcomes of labor induction with dinoprostone or single-balloon catheter in term nulliparous women with borderline oligohydramnios
    Zhang Yongqing
    Chen Luping
    Yan Guohui
    Zhou Menglin
    Chen Zhengyun
    Liang Zhaoxia
    Chen Danqing
    中华医学杂志英文版, 2022, 135 (06) : 681 - 690
  • [47] A randomized comparison between misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction in patients with unfavorable cervices
    Buser, D
    Mora, G
    Arias, F
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 89 (04): : 581 - 585
  • [48] Dinoprostone vaginal insert compared to cervical ripening balloon as second line of cervical ripening after first dinoprostone insert
    Pradeau, Isabelle
    Planche, Lucie
    Dimet, Jerome
    Winer, Norbert
    Ducarme, Guillaume
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2024, 302 : 87 - 93
  • [49] What will be the future of dinoprostone in labor induction?
    Ragusa, Antonio
    De Luca, Caterina
    Zucchelli, Emma
    Svelato, Alessandro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2022, 157 (03) : 751 - 752
  • [50] Vaginal dinoprostone and misoprostol are equally safe in labour induction at term whereas dinoprostone is less efficacious for cervical ripening and shortening the time of labour
    Zietek, Maciej
    Swiatkowska-Freud, Malgorzata
    Grajnert, Kinga
    Celewicz, Zbigniew
    Szczuko, Malgorzata
    GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2021, 92 (06) : 428 - 435
12345