Dinoprostone versus cervical ripening balloon for term nulliparous labor induction following primary Dinoprostone induction failure

被引:0
|
作者
Lauterbach, Roy [1 ]
Ben David, Chen [2 ]
Siegler, Yoav [2 ]
Justman, Naphtali [2 ]
Bachar, Gal [3 ]
Vitner, Dana [4 ]
Ghanim, Nadier [2 ]
Beloosesky, Ron [5 ]
Weiner, Zeev [2 ]
Ginsberg, Yuval [5 ]
Khatib, Nizar [6 ]
机构
[1] St Michaels Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Rambam Healthcare Campus, Haifa, Israel
[3] Rambam Healthcare Campus, Ramat Yishai, Israel
[4] Rambam Healthcare Campus, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Rambam Med Ctr, Haifa, Israel
[6] Rambam Healthcare Campus, Akko, Israel
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
985
引用
收藏
页码:S628 / S629
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Efficacy of dinoprostone and misoprostol for labor induction in nulliparous women
    Oliveira, Tenilson Amaral
    Vieira de Melo, Elisa Matatias
    Auxiliadora de Aquino, Marcia Maria
    Neto, Corintio Mariani
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA, 2011, 33 (03): : 118 - 122
  • [12] Cardiotocographic abnormalities associated with misoprostol and dinoprostone cervical ripening and labor induction
    Pevzner, Leo
    Alfirevic, Zarko
    Powers, Barbara L.
    Wing, Deborah A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2011, 156 (02) : 144 - 148
  • [13] Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction
    Chang, CH
    Chang, FM
    JOURNAL OF THE FORMOSAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 96 (05) : 366 - 369
  • [14] Cervical ripening and labor induction: Evaluation of single balloon catheter compared to double balloon catheter and dinoprostone insert
    Pez, V
    Deruelle, P.
    Kyheng, M.
    Boyon, C.
    Clouqueur, E.
    Garabedian, C.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE, 2018, 46 (7-8): : 570 - 574
  • [15] Intracervical double‐balloon catheter versus dinoprostone for cervical ripening in labor induction in pregnancies with a high risk of uterine hyperstimulation
    Javier Vega Cañadas
    María Teulón González
    Natalia Pagola Limón
    María Sanz Alguacil
    María García-Luján Prieto
    Rocío Canete Riaza
    Rosa Montero-Macías
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2021, 304 : 1475 - 1484
  • [16] Dinoprostone versus misoprostol: a randomized study of nulliparous women undergoing induction of labor
    Lokugamage, AU
    Forsyth, SF
    Sullivan, KR
    El Refaey, H
    Rodeck, CH
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2003, 82 (02) : 133 - 137
  • [17] Oral misoprostol vs vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction in nulliparous women at term
    Faucett, Allison
    Daniels, Kay
    El-Sayed, Yasser
    Lee, Henry
    Blumenfeld, Yair
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 208 (01) : S53 - S53
  • [18] Effect of vaginal pH on efficacy of the dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening/labor induction
    Ramsey, PS
    Ogburn, PL
    Harris, DY
    Heise, RH
    Ramin, KD
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 187 (04) : 843 - 846
  • [19] Dinoprostone vaginal insert for cervical ripening and labor induction: A meta-analysis
    Hughes, EG
    Kelly, AJ
    Kavanagh, J
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 97 (05): : 847 - 855
  • [20] Oral misoprostol and intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction: A randomized comparison
    Bartha, JL
    Comino-Delgado, R
    Garcia-Benasach, F
    Martinez-Del-Fresno, P
    Moreno-Corral, LJ
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 96 (03): : 465 - 469