Geographic distribution pattern of threatened plants of India and steps taken for their conservation

被引:24
|
作者
Barik, S. K. [1 ,2 ]
Tiwari, O. N. [3 ]
Adhikari, D. [1 ]
Singh, P. P. [1 ]
Tiwary, R. [1 ]
Barua, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] North Eastern Hill Univ, Dept Bot, Shillong 793022, Meghalaya, India
[2] CSIR Natl Bot Res Inst, Lucknow 226001, Uttar Pradesh, India
[3] Govt India, Det Biotechnol, New Delhi 110003, India
来源
CURRENT SCIENCE | 2018年 / 114卷 / 03期
关键词
Conservation strategy; geographic distribution pattern; threatened plants; AREA;
D O I
10.18520/cs/v114/i03/470-503
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In spite of its importance in nation-wide conservation planning, comprehensive information on geographic distribution of threatened plants in India is lacking. Even the threat status of these plants is ambiguous and the country's effort to conserve them is not widely known. A critical analysis of these aspects is essential for identifying gaps in threatened plant conservation. Keeping these in view, we present a review of the existing knowledge on geographic distribution pattern of threatened plants of India, their threat status, and conservation action undertaken to recover these species. Using the available data, we unravel patterns of distribution of these threatened plants in different states of India. When ranking of the families was done based on the total number of species under different threat categories, Orchidaceae (644), Fabaceae (185), Poaceae (164), Rubiaceae (103), Asteraceae (88), Euphorbiaceae (72), Asclepiadaceae (62) and Acanthaceae (60) constituted more than half of the total threatened plant species of India. A review on conservation efforts so far undertaken in different parts of the country revealed that the biodiversity-rich phytogeographic regions such as the Himalayas, North East India, and Andaman and Nicobar Islands had lesser conservation efforts in comparison to the Western Ghats, Vindhyas and Peninsular regions of India. The skewed distribution of threatened plants in different states did not truly reflect their absolute presence or absence; rather it is the result of incomplete survey because of the difficult geomorphological and associated geo-climatic conditions, tough terrain and remote locations. In addition, the current data on threatened plants suffer from methodological shortcomings such as classification without using the population data that are so crucial in modern day threat classification, and lack of long-term observational data. The review emphasizes the use of modern tools such as ecological niche modelling for population inventory, area of occupancy and extent of occurrence, and trends in population size and regeneration for precise threat classification conforming to globally accepted methods (e.g. IUCN version 3.1). The works undertaken through the support of Department of Biotechnology, GoI for conservation of 156 threatened plant species under different disciplines of conservation biology during the past three decades have also been compiled and reviewed. A successfully tested protocol following an integrated approach for threatened species conservation is recommended for future conservation action.
引用
收藏
页码:470 / 503
页数:34
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The significance of ex situ seed conservation to reintroduction of threatened plants
    Cochrane, J. A.
    Crawford, A. D.
    Monks, L. T.
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2007, 55 (03) : 356 - 361
  • [43] THREATENED MEDICINAL PLANTS OF KANO FLORA AND THE NEED FOR URGENT CONSERVATION
    Abubakar, Umar Suleiman
    Khalifa, Binta Ibrahim
    Abdu, Fatima
    Sanusi, Muhammad
    Gawuna, Tijjani Abdu
    Adamu, Jamila Gambo
    Rogo, Sagiru Saidu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSERVATION SCIENCE, 2018, 9 (01) : 173 - 178
  • [44] Combining species distribution modeling and field surveys to reappraise the geographic distribution and conservation status of the threatened thin-spined porcupine (Chaetomys subspinosus)
    Fernandez Gine, Gaston Andres
    Faria, Deborah
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (11):
  • [45] Erratum: Global distribution and conservation of rare and threatened vertebrates
    Richard Grenyer
    C. David L. Orme
    Sarah F. Jackson
    Gavin H. Thomas
    Richard G. Davies
    T. Jonathan Davies
    Kate E. Jones
    Valerie A. Olson
    Robert S. Ridgely
    Pamela C. Rasmussen
    Tzung-Su Ding
    Peter M. Bennett
    Tim M. Blackburn
    Kevin J. Gaston
    John L. Gittleman
    Ian P. F. Owens
    Nature, 2009, 458 : 238 - 238
  • [46] Notes on conservation of 'RET' plants in India
    Panda, Sauris
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2014, 106 (07): : 916 - 916
  • [47] The distribution and conservation of threatened sphaeriidae on British grazing marshland
    Watson, AM
    Ormerod, SJ
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2005, 14 (09) : 2207 - 2220
  • [48] The distribution and conservation of threatened Sphaeriidae on British grazing marshland
    Alisa M. Watson
    S.J. Ormerod
    Biodiversity & Conservation, 2005, 14 : 2207 - 2220
  • [49] Threatened Mammals With Alien Populations: Distribution, Causes, and Conservation
    Tedeschi, Lisa
    Lenzner, Bernd
    Schertler, Anna
    Biancolini, Dino
    Essl, Franz
    Rondinini, Carlo
    CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2025, 18 (01):
  • [50] Endangered, threatened, and sensitive plants of Fort Lewis, Washington: Distribution, mapping, and management recommendations for species conservation.
    Thomas, TB
    Carey, AB
    NORTHWEST SCIENCE, 1996, 70 (02) : 148 - 163