Geographic distribution pattern of threatened plants of India and steps taken for their conservation

被引:24
|
作者
Barik, S. K. [1 ,2 ]
Tiwari, O. N. [3 ]
Adhikari, D. [1 ]
Singh, P. P. [1 ]
Tiwary, R. [1 ]
Barua, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] North Eastern Hill Univ, Dept Bot, Shillong 793022, Meghalaya, India
[2] CSIR Natl Bot Res Inst, Lucknow 226001, Uttar Pradesh, India
[3] Govt India, Det Biotechnol, New Delhi 110003, India
来源
CURRENT SCIENCE | 2018年 / 114卷 / 03期
关键词
Conservation strategy; geographic distribution pattern; threatened plants; AREA;
D O I
10.18520/cs/v114/i03/470-503
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In spite of its importance in nation-wide conservation planning, comprehensive information on geographic distribution of threatened plants in India is lacking. Even the threat status of these plants is ambiguous and the country's effort to conserve them is not widely known. A critical analysis of these aspects is essential for identifying gaps in threatened plant conservation. Keeping these in view, we present a review of the existing knowledge on geographic distribution pattern of threatened plants of India, their threat status, and conservation action undertaken to recover these species. Using the available data, we unravel patterns of distribution of these threatened plants in different states of India. When ranking of the families was done based on the total number of species under different threat categories, Orchidaceae (644), Fabaceae (185), Poaceae (164), Rubiaceae (103), Asteraceae (88), Euphorbiaceae (72), Asclepiadaceae (62) and Acanthaceae (60) constituted more than half of the total threatened plant species of India. A review on conservation efforts so far undertaken in different parts of the country revealed that the biodiversity-rich phytogeographic regions such as the Himalayas, North East India, and Andaman and Nicobar Islands had lesser conservation efforts in comparison to the Western Ghats, Vindhyas and Peninsular regions of India. The skewed distribution of threatened plants in different states did not truly reflect their absolute presence or absence; rather it is the result of incomplete survey because of the difficult geomorphological and associated geo-climatic conditions, tough terrain and remote locations. In addition, the current data on threatened plants suffer from methodological shortcomings such as classification without using the population data that are so crucial in modern day threat classification, and lack of long-term observational data. The review emphasizes the use of modern tools such as ecological niche modelling for population inventory, area of occupancy and extent of occurrence, and trends in population size and regeneration for precise threat classification conforming to globally accepted methods (e.g. IUCN version 3.1). The works undertaken through the support of Department of Biotechnology, GoI for conservation of 156 threatened plant species under different disciplines of conservation biology during the past three decades have also been compiled and reviewed. A successfully tested protocol following an integrated approach for threatened species conservation is recommended for future conservation action.
引用
收藏
页码:470 / 503
页数:34
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION OF DRUG PLANTS
    DENO, RA
    LLOYDIA, 1962, 25 (04): : 271 - &
  • [22] Geographic distribution, conservation effectiveness, and gaps for national key protected wild plants in China
    Qin, Fei
    Zhang, Xiao-Xia
    Huang, Yun-Feng
    Wu, Lei
    Xu, Wei-Bin
    Xue, Tian-Tian
    Zhang, Wen-Di
    Liu, Qin
    Yu, Jiang-Hong
    Gao, Jie-Jing
    Bussmann, Rainer W.
    Wang, Juan
    Yu, Sheng-Xiang
    JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION, 2023, 61 (06) : 967 - 978
  • [23] Conservation and prioritization of threatened plants in Indian Himalayan Region
    Mehta, Poonam
    Sekar, K. Chandra
    Bhatt, Deepika
    Tewari, Ashutosh
    Bisht, Kapil
    Upadhyay, Shashi
    Negi, Vikram S.
    Soragi, Bhawana
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2020, 29 (06) : 1723 - 1745
  • [24] Characteristics and conservation priority of threatened plants in the Yangtze valley
    Xie, Z
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2003, 12 (01) : 65 - 72
  • [25] Threatened medicinal plants in China: Distributions and conservation priorities
    Chi, Xiulian
    Zhang, Zejin
    Xu, Xiaoting
    Zhang, Xiaobo
    Zhao, Zhiping
    Liu, Yining
    Wang, Qinggang
    Wang, Hui
    Li, Ying
    Yang, Guang
    Guo, Lanping
    Tang, Zhiyao
    Huang, Luqi
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2017, 210 : 89 - 95
  • [26] Conservation in vitro of threatened plants - Progress in the past decade
    Sarasan V.
    Cripps R.
    Ramsay M.M.
    Atherton C.
    McMichen M.
    Prendergast G.
    Rowntree J.K.
    In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant, 2006, 42 (3) : 206 - 214
  • [27] Conservation in vitro of threatened plants -: Progress in the past decade
    Sarasan, Viswambharan
    Cripps, Ryan
    Ramsay, Margaret M.
    Atherton, Caroline
    McMichen, Monica
    Prendergast, Grace
    Rowntree, Jennifer K.
    IN VITRO CELLULAR & DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY-PLANT, 2006, 42 (03) : 206 - 214
  • [28] Conservation and prioritization of threatened plants in Indian Himalayan Region
    Poonam Mehta
    K. Chandra Sekar
    Deepika Bhatt
    Ashutosh Tewari
    Kapil Bisht
    Shashi Upadhyay
    Vikram S. Negi
    Bhawana Soragi
    Biodiversity and Conservation, 2020, 29 : 1723 - 1745
  • [29] Characteristics and conservation priority of threatened plants in the Yangtze valley
    Z. Xie
    Biodiversity & Conservation, 2003, 12 : 65 - 72
  • [30] Global distribution and conservation of rare and threatened vertebrates
    Richard Grenyer
    C. David L. Orme
    Sarah F. Jackson
    Gavin H. Thomas
    Richard G. Davies
    T. Jonathan Davies
    Kate E. Jones
    Valerie A. Olson
    Robert S. Ridgely
    Pamela C. Rasmussen
    Tzung-Su Ding
    Peter M. Bennett
    Tim M. Blackburn
    Kevin J. Gaston
    John L. Gittleman
    Ian P. F. Owens
    Nature, 2006, 444 : 93 - 96