Are multi-criteria decision-making tools useful? An experimental comparative study of three methods

被引:143
|
作者
Ishizaka, Alessio [1 ]
Siraj, Sajid [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Portsmouth, CORL, Portsmouth Business Sch, Portsmouth PO1 3DE, Hants, England
[2] Univ Leeds, Business Sch, Ctr Decis Res, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[3] COMSATS Inst Informat Technol, Wah Cantonment, Pakistan
关键词
Decision analysis; SMART; AHP; MACBETH; Experimental evaluation; UTILITY; ACCEPTANCE; SET;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2017.05.041
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Many decision makers still question the usefulness of multi-criteria decision-making methods and prefer to rely on intuitive decisions. In this study we evaluated a number of multi-criteria decision-making tools for their usefulness using incentive-based experiments, which is a novel approach in operations research but common in psychology and experimental economics. In this experiment the participants were asked to compare five coffee shops to win a voucher for their best-rated shop. We found that, although the usefulness of different multi-criteria decision-making tools varied to some extent, all the tools were found to be useful in the sense that, when they decided to change their ranking, they followed the recommendation of the multi-criteria decision-making tool. Moreover, the level of inconsistency in the judgements provided had no significant effect on the usefulness of these tools. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:462 / 471
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Multi-criteria decision-making methods for preliminary design of sustainable facades
    Moghtadernejad, Saviz
    Chouinard, Luc. E.
    Mirza, M. Saeed
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2018, 19 : 181 - 190
  • [42] Multi-criteria decision-making methods based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets
    Liu, Hua-Wen
    Wang, Guo-Jun
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2007, 179 (01) : 220 - 233
  • [43] Examining the Research Performance of Universities with Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods
    Maral, Muammer
    SAGE OPEN, 2024, 14 (04):
  • [44] Comparison of the applicability of computer supported multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Cancer, V
    SOR 05 Proceedings, 2005, : 317 - 322
  • [45] Deconstruction plan assessment using multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Chen, Z
    Abdullah, A
    Anumba, C
    Li, H
    Xu, Q
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2005 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONSTRUCTION & REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2: CHALLENGE OF INNOVATION IN CONSTRUCTION AND REAL ESTATE, 2005, : 465 - 469
  • [46] MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING METHODS FOR SUPPLIER SELECTION: A LITERATURE REVIEW
    Yildiz, A.
    Yayla, A. Y.
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 26 (02): : 158 - 177
  • [47] Approach to the Development, Improvement, and Modification of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods
    M. M. Potomkin
    O. V. Dublian
    R. B. Khomchak
    Cybernetics and Systems Analysis, 2019, 55 : 967 - 977
  • [48] Exploration of employability perceptions with blended multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Castro-Lopez, Adrian
    Monteiro, Silvia
    Bernardo, Ana B.
    Almeida, Leandro S.
    EDUCATION AND TRAINING, 2022, 64 (02): : 259 - 275
  • [49] A Comprehensive Review of the Novel Weighting Methods for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Ayan, Buesra
    Abacioglu, Seda
    Basilio, Marcio Pereira
    INFORMATION, 2023, 14 (05)
  • [50] Approach to the Development, Improvement, and Modification of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods
    Potomkin, M. M.
    Dublian, O. V.
    Khomchak, R. B.
    CYBERNETICS AND SYSTEMS ANALYSIS, 2019, 55 (06) : 967 - 977