Are multi-criteria decision-making tools useful? An experimental comparative study of three methods

被引:143
|
作者
Ishizaka, Alessio [1 ]
Siraj, Sajid [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Portsmouth, CORL, Portsmouth Business Sch, Portsmouth PO1 3DE, Hants, England
[2] Univ Leeds, Business Sch, Ctr Decis Res, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[3] COMSATS Inst Informat Technol, Wah Cantonment, Pakistan
关键词
Decision analysis; SMART; AHP; MACBETH; Experimental evaluation; UTILITY; ACCEPTANCE; SET;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2017.05.041
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Many decision makers still question the usefulness of multi-criteria decision-making methods and prefer to rely on intuitive decisions. In this study we evaluated a number of multi-criteria decision-making tools for their usefulness using incentive-based experiments, which is a novel approach in operations research but common in psychology and experimental economics. In this experiment the participants were asked to compare five coffee shops to win a voucher for their best-rated shop. We found that, although the usefulness of different multi-criteria decision-making tools varied to some extent, all the tools were found to be useful in the sense that, when they decided to change their ranking, they followed the recommendation of the multi-criteria decision-making tool. Moreover, the level of inconsistency in the judgements provided had no significant effect on the usefulness of these tools. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:462 / 471
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Application of Multi-criteria Decision-making Methods for the Area of Recycling
    Mikusova, Nikoleta
    Stopka, Ondrej
    Stopkova, Maria
    TEM JOURNAL-TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION MANAGEMENT INFORMATICS, 2019, 8 (03): : 827 - 835
  • [32] MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING METHODS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS FOR HUMAN RESOURCES
    D'Urso, Maria Grazia
    Masi, Daniele
    ISPRS Workshop of Commission VI 1-3, Advances in Web-based Education Services, 2015, 46 (W1): : 31 - 37
  • [33] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Tools for Project Selection by International Conglomerates
    Lee, Ho Yan
    Heng, Yi Peng
    Selvanathan, Kashwin
    Chandrahasan, Prasanth
    Chemmangattuvalappil, Nishanth G.
    PROCESS INTEGRATION AND OPTIMIZATION FOR SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 8 (02) : 375 - 393
  • [34] A multi-criteria decision-making in turning process using the MAIRCA, EAMR, MARCOS and TOPSIS methods: A comparative study
    Trung, D. D.
    Thinh, H. X.
    ADVANCES IN PRODUCTION ENGINEERING & MANAGEMENT, 2021, 16 (04): : 443 - 456
  • [35] A Comparative Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods for Resource Selection in Mobile Crowd Computing
    Pramanik, Pijush Kanti Dutta
    Biswas, Sanjib
    Pal, Saurabh
    Marinkovic, Dragan
    Choudhury, Prasenjit
    SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2021, 13 (09):
  • [36] Consensus among Multi-Criteria Decision-Making methods: Using methods as a voter
    Hocaoglu, M. Fatih
    Tosun, Emre
    JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE OF GAZI UNIVERSITY, 2024, 40 (01): : 103 - 120
  • [37] Comparative analysis of fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methods in maintenance prioritisation of infrastructure assets
    Shahrivar, Farham
    Mahmoodian, Mojtaba
    Li, Chun Qing
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURES, 2022, 18 (02) : 172 - 195
  • [38] Comparative analysis of various oxygen production techniques using multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Aljaghoub H.
    Alasad S.
    Alashkar A.
    AlMallahi M.
    Hasan R.
    Obaideen K.
    Alami A.H.
    International Journal of Thermofluids, 2023, 17
  • [39] Comparison of multi-criteria decision-making methods for online controlled experiments in a launch decision-making framework
    Wu, Jie J. W.
    Mazzuchi, Thomas A.
    Sarkani, Shahram
    INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 155
  • [40] Sensitivity Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods for Engineering Applications
    Nabavi, Seyed Reza
    Wang, Zhiyuan
    Rangaiah, Gade Pandu
    INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2023, 62 (17) : 6707 - 6722