Collaborative decision-making in multi-buy food purchases

被引:2
|
作者
Anderson, Craig G. [1 ]
Reid, Louise A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stirling, Stirling Management Sch, Stirling, Scotland
[2] Univ St Andrews, Sch Geog & Sustainable Dev, St Andrews, Fife, Scotland
关键词
Food waste; Decision-making; Consumer behavior; Risk; Collaboration; Deliberation; SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION; WASTE PRACTICES; CONSUMER; BEHAVIOR; OPPORTUNITIES; ENVIRONMENT; COLOR; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.128
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This research presents a quasi-experiment utilizing an original card-game to investigate aspects implicated in the creation of food waste in the UK, including over purchasing due to a lack of advanced planning as well as susceptibility to advertising multi-buy offers. A card game embedding a clear tradeoff between the temptation of additional gain and the risk of waste was devised. Decisions to purchase different multi-buy offers were recorded across individual and group decision-making. The results indicate that collaborative purchase decision-making could have some impact on the way in which the risk of waste is dealt with, consistent with social signaling and collective action. Compared to individual decision-making, group decision-making saw a deferral in choices to purchase multi-buy offers with an associated risk of wastefulness wen only a moderate temptation was added. These differences were embedded in both planned strategies and revealed behavior. Food waste is linked to marketing practices as well as household routines and perceived levels of control, particularly amongst households with multiple young adults. Shopping is typically conducted as an individual, however collaborative shopping experiences may help with planning and control, particularly amongst a student population. Crown Copyright (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:520 / 527
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Using collaborative decision-making to implement TMDLs
    Bunting-Howarth, KE
    TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD (TMDL): ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 525 - 531
  • [32] The Collaborative Autonomy Model of Medical Decision-Making
    Michael A. Rubin
    Neurocritical Care, 2014, 20 : 311 - 318
  • [33] A collaborative model for technology evaluation and decision-making
    Lin, Grace T. R.
    Shen, Yung Chi
    JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC & INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH, 2010, 69 (02): : 94 - 100
  • [34] Collaborative Decision-Making in Emergency and Disaster Management
    Kapucu, Naim
    Garayev, Vener
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2011, 34 (06) : 366 - 375
  • [35] A Collaborative Decision-Making Framework in Humanitarian Logistics
    Buyukozkan, Gulcin
    Gocer, Fethullah
    INTELLIGENT AND FUZZY SYSTEMS, INFUS 2024 CONFERENCE, VOL 1, 2024, 1088 : 99 - 107
  • [36] Collaborative design decision-making as social process
    Campbell, Chris
    Roth, Wolff-Michael
    Jornet, Alfredo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2019, 44 (03) : 294 - 311
  • [37] Collaborative platform to facilitate engineering decision-making
    Walsh, Claire L.
    Glendinning, Stephanie
    Dawson, Richard J.
    England, Kit
    Martin, Mike
    Watkins, Claire L.
    Wilson, Rob
    McLoughlin, Adrian
    Glenis, Vassilis
    Parker, David
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-ENGINEERING SUSTAINABILITY, 2013, 166 (02) : 98 - 107
  • [38] Fair Decision-Making for Food Inspections
    Singh, Shubham
    Shah, Bhuvni
    Kanich, Chris
    Kash, Ian A.
    ACM CONFERENCE ON EQUITY AND ACCESS IN ALGORITHMS, MECHANISMS, AND OPTIMIZATION, EAAMO 2022, 2022,
  • [39] Developing an approach for design-or-buy-design decision-making
    Le Dain, Marie-Anne
    Calvi, Richard
    Cheriti, Sandra
    JOURNAL OF PURCHASING AND SUPPLY MANAGEMENT, 2010, 16 (02) : 77 - 87
  • [40] DECISION-MAKING AND FOOD CHANGING SYSTEM
    不详
    FOOD POLICY, 1976, 1 (03) : 178 - 178