Collaborative decision-making in multi-buy food purchases

被引:2
|
作者
Anderson, Craig G. [1 ]
Reid, Louise A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stirling, Stirling Management Sch, Stirling, Scotland
[2] Univ St Andrews, Sch Geog & Sustainable Dev, St Andrews, Fife, Scotland
关键词
Food waste; Decision-making; Consumer behavior; Risk; Collaboration; Deliberation; SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION; WASTE PRACTICES; CONSUMER; BEHAVIOR; OPPORTUNITIES; ENVIRONMENT; COLOR; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.128
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This research presents a quasi-experiment utilizing an original card-game to investigate aspects implicated in the creation of food waste in the UK, including over purchasing due to a lack of advanced planning as well as susceptibility to advertising multi-buy offers. A card game embedding a clear tradeoff between the temptation of additional gain and the risk of waste was devised. Decisions to purchase different multi-buy offers were recorded across individual and group decision-making. The results indicate that collaborative purchase decision-making could have some impact on the way in which the risk of waste is dealt with, consistent with social signaling and collective action. Compared to individual decision-making, group decision-making saw a deferral in choices to purchase multi-buy offers with an associated risk of wastefulness wen only a moderate temptation was added. These differences were embedded in both planned strategies and revealed behavior. Food waste is linked to marketing practices as well as household routines and perceived levels of control, particularly amongst households with multiple young adults. Shopping is typically conducted as an individual, however collaborative shopping experiences may help with planning and control, particularly amongst a student population. Crown Copyright (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:520 / 527
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multi-user collaborative exploration of map and decision-making on a multi-touch tabletop
    Huang, Weikai
    Chen, Ling
    Chen, Gencai
    Dongnan Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue Ban)/Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), 2010, 40 (SUPPL. 2): : 242 - 247
  • [22] A collaborative decision-making model for orientation detection
    Wei, Hui
    Ren, Yuan
    Li, Bao-Ming
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2013, 13 (01) : 302 - 314
  • [23] COLLABORATIVE PRODUCTION OF PROPOSALS IN GROUP DECISION-MAKING
    SABOURIN, TC
    GEIST, P
    SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 1990, 21 (03) : 404 - 427
  • [24] The Collaborative Autonomy Model of Medical Decision-Making
    Rubin, Michael A.
    NEUROCRITICAL CARE, 2014, 20 (02) : 311 - 318
  • [25] Convergencies and Divergencies in Collaborative Decision-Making Processes
    Ferretti, Valentina
    CONTEMPORARY ISSUES IN GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, GDN 2021, 2021, 420 : 155 - 169
  • [26] Manufacturing Process Specification and Collaborative Decision-making
    Qiao, Lihong
    Kao, Shuting
    Zhu, Yixin
    NEW TRENDS IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING AND MATERIALS, 2013, 251 : 79 - 83
  • [27] Improving Collaborative Decision-making in the Pediatric Setting
    Small, Pageen Manolis
    AACN ADVANCED CRITICAL CARE, 2019, 30 (02) : 189 - 192
  • [28] Collaborative decision-making for extreme premature delivery
    Kent, Alison L.
    Casey, Anne
    Lui, Kei
    JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH, 2007, 43 (06) : 489 - 491
  • [29] Decision-Making Coordination in Collaborative Product Configuration
    Mendonca, Marcilio
    Bartolomei, Thiago Tonelli
    Cowan, Donald
    APPLIED COMPUTING 2008, VOLS 1-3, 2008, : 108 - +
  • [30] Collaborative Human Decision-Making With Heterogeneous Agents
    Geng, Baocheng
    Cheng, Xiancheng
    Brahma, Swastik
    Kellen, David
    Varshney, Pramod K.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL SOCIAL SYSTEMS, 2022, 9 (02): : 469 - 479