Carpentier-Edwards standard and supraannular porcine bioprostheses: Comparison of technology

被引:25
|
作者
Jamieson, WRE [1 ]
Burr, LH [1 ]
Janusz, MT [1 ]
Munro, AI [1 ]
Hayden, RI [1 ]
Miyagishima, RT [1 ]
Ling, H [1 ]
Fradet, GJ [1 ]
Lichtenstein, SV [1 ]
Stewart, KM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Div Cardiovasc Surg, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
来源
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY | 1999年 / 67卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0003-4975(98)01056-X
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Performance with regard to structural valve deterioration (SVD) with the Carpentier-Edwards standard (CE-S) and supraannular (CE-SAV) (Baxter Healthcare Corp, Irvine, CA) porcine bioprostheses was evaluated to determine whether progress in reduction of structural failure has been achieved with technological changes. Methods. The CE-S was implanted during 567 aortic valve replacement (AVR) and 486 mitral valve replacement (MVR) procedures, and the CE-SAV was implanted during 1,670 AVR and 1,096 MVR procedures. The failure mode of early stent dehiscence with the CE-SAV prosthesis, thought to be controlled by manufacturing changes in 1986 and 1987, supported comparison of the CE-SAV with censored cases of stent dehiscence. Stent dehiscence accounted for only 1.2% (1 of 81) and 14.1% (29 of 205) of AVR and MVR CE-SAV failures, respectively. Results. The only difference for AVR for freedom from SVD occurred in the 21- to 40-year age group at 15 years and was 68% for the CE-SAV and 31% for the CE-S (p < 0.05). In the 61- to 70-year age group, freedom from SVD at 15 years was 76% for the CE-S and 84% for the CE-SAV; for the 71-year or higher age group, freedom from SVD was 89% and 95%, respectively (p = NS). For MVR freedom from SVD was different only in the 71-year or higher age group and was 90% for the CE-S and 59% for the CE-SAV (p < 0.05). Freedom from SVD was reduced but was similar (p = NS) for the other age groups. For AVR the actual freedom from SVD at 15 years for the CE-S and CE-SAV was, respectively, 79% and 72% for the 51- to 60-year age group, 86% and 91% for the 61- to 70-year age group, and 98% and 98% for the 71-year or higher age group. For MVR, these rates were, respectively, 69% and 75% for the 61- to 70-year age group and 96% and 89% for the 71-year and higher age group. Conclusions. The technologic advancements made in the second-generation CE-SAV bioprosthesis to reduce the incidence of structural failure have not uniformly been successful. The actual freedom from SVD provides evidence for implantation of porcine bioprostheses for AVR in age groups 61 to 70 years and 71 years or higher and for MVR in the age group 71 years or higher. (C) 1999 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 17
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Early Doppler-echocardiography evaluation of Carpentier-Edwards Standard and Carpentier-Edwards Magna aortic prosthetic valve: comparison of hemodynamic performance
    Giovanni Minardi
    Giovanni Pulignano
    Donatella Del Sindaco
    Martina Sordi
    Herribert Pavaci
    Amedeo Pergolini
    Giordano Zampi
    Francesca Moschella Orsini
    Carlo Gaudio
    Francesco Musumeci
    Cardiovascular Ultrasound, 9
  • [42] Structural valve deterioration in mitral replacement surgery: Comparison of Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular porcine and perimount pericardial bioprostheses
    Jamieson, WRE
    Marchand, MA
    Pelletier, CL
    Norton, R
    Pellerin, M
    Dubiel, TW
    Aupart, MR
    Daenen, WJ
    Holden, MP
    David, TE
    Ryba, EA
    Anderson, WN
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1999, 118 (02): : 297 - 304
  • [43] COMMISSURAL DEHISCENCE OF CARPENTIER-EDWARDS MITRAL BIOPROSTHESES - EXPLANT ANALYSIS AND PATHOGENESIS
    NISTAL, JF
    HURLE, A
    GUTIERREZ, JA
    MAZORRA, F
    REVUELTA, JM
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1995, 110 (03): : 688 - 695
  • [44] Long-term comparison of the pericardial Carpentier-Edwards bioprostheses and the Carbomedic mechanical heart valves
    Pellerin, M
    Carrier, M
    Bouchard, D
    Perrault, LP
    Cartier, R
    Hebert, Y
    Page, P
    Poirier, N
    CIRCULATION, 2002, 106 (19) : 554 - 555
  • [45] EARLY AND LATE ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS MODELS OF CARPENTIER-EDWARDS AORTIC BIOPROSTHESES
    BONAN, R
    DYRDA, I
    VAL, PG
    CREPEAU, J
    PELLETIER, LC
    PASTERNAC, A
    CIRCULATION, 1984, 70 (04) : 166 - 166
  • [46] CLINICAL-EXPERIENCE WITH THE CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PORCINE XENOGRAFT
    JAMIESON, MPG
    BENNETT, JG
    ROBLES, A
    ROSS, DN
    THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON, 1981, 29 (04): : 200 - 205
  • [47] EVALUATION OF THE CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PORCINE BIOPROSTHESIS IN THE TRICUSPID POSITION
    DELCAMPO, C
    AKALIN, H
    MCKENZIE, FN
    TEXAS HEART INSTITUTE JOURNAL, 1982, 9 (03) : 299 - 302
  • [48] An unusual complication associated with the Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis
    Misawa, Y
    Oki, SI
    Tezuka, Y
    Fuse, K
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2001, 47 (05) : 563 - 564
  • [49] CARPENTIER-EDWARDS STANDARD PORCINE BIOPROSTHESIS - EVALUATION OF VALVE-RELATED MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY
    JAMIESON, WRE
    MIYAGISHIMA, RT
    TYERS, GFO
    CHAN, F
    MACNAB, J
    JANUSZ, MT
    GEREIN, AN
    CLINICAL AND INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE-MEDECINE CLINIQUE ET EXPERIMENTALE, 1986, 9 (03): : A7 - A7
  • [50] DURABILITY OF CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PORCINE BIOPROSTHESES IN THE AORTIC OR MITRAL POSITIONS - 10 YEAR RESULTS IN 458 OPERATED PATIENTS
    SOOTS, G
    STANKOWIAK, C
    WAREMBOURG, H
    POL, A
    WATEL, A
    PRAT, A
    DEVULDER, JP
    DUFAY, C
    MOREAU, D
    NOBLET, D
    GASMI, T
    ANDRE, P
    ROUX, JP
    CREPIN, F
    CAJOT, MA
    ENVAIN, D
    MENDONCA, JP
    NGALIKPIMA, V
    MONIER, E
    ABDELMASSI, G
    ALKOUSSA, M
    ANNALES DE CHIRURGIE, 1989, 43 (08): : 616 - 623