Carpentier-Edwards standard and supraannular porcine bioprostheses: Comparison of technology

被引:25
|
作者
Jamieson, WRE [1 ]
Burr, LH [1 ]
Janusz, MT [1 ]
Munro, AI [1 ]
Hayden, RI [1 ]
Miyagishima, RT [1 ]
Ling, H [1 ]
Fradet, GJ [1 ]
Lichtenstein, SV [1 ]
Stewart, KM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Div Cardiovasc Surg, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
来源
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY | 1999年 / 67卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0003-4975(98)01056-X
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Performance with regard to structural valve deterioration (SVD) with the Carpentier-Edwards standard (CE-S) and supraannular (CE-SAV) (Baxter Healthcare Corp, Irvine, CA) porcine bioprostheses was evaluated to determine whether progress in reduction of structural failure has been achieved with technological changes. Methods. The CE-S was implanted during 567 aortic valve replacement (AVR) and 486 mitral valve replacement (MVR) procedures, and the CE-SAV was implanted during 1,670 AVR and 1,096 MVR procedures. The failure mode of early stent dehiscence with the CE-SAV prosthesis, thought to be controlled by manufacturing changes in 1986 and 1987, supported comparison of the CE-SAV with censored cases of stent dehiscence. Stent dehiscence accounted for only 1.2% (1 of 81) and 14.1% (29 of 205) of AVR and MVR CE-SAV failures, respectively. Results. The only difference for AVR for freedom from SVD occurred in the 21- to 40-year age group at 15 years and was 68% for the CE-SAV and 31% for the CE-S (p < 0.05). In the 61- to 70-year age group, freedom from SVD at 15 years was 76% for the CE-S and 84% for the CE-SAV; for the 71-year or higher age group, freedom from SVD was 89% and 95%, respectively (p = NS). For MVR freedom from SVD was different only in the 71-year or higher age group and was 90% for the CE-S and 59% for the CE-SAV (p < 0.05). Freedom from SVD was reduced but was similar (p = NS) for the other age groups. For AVR the actual freedom from SVD at 15 years for the CE-S and CE-SAV was, respectively, 79% and 72% for the 51- to 60-year age group, 86% and 91% for the 61- to 70-year age group, and 98% and 98% for the 71-year or higher age group. For MVR, these rates were, respectively, 69% and 75% for the 61- to 70-year age group and 96% and 89% for the 71-year and higher age group. Conclusions. The technologic advancements made in the second-generation CE-SAV bioprosthesis to reduce the incidence of structural failure have not uniformly been successful. The actual freedom from SVD provides evidence for implantation of porcine bioprostheses for AVR in age groups 61 to 70 years and 71 years or higher and for MVR in the age group 71 years or higher. (C) 1999 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 17
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] STRUCTURAL DETERIORATION IN CARPENTIER-EDWARDS STANDARD AND SUPRAANNULAR PORCINE BIOPROSTHESES
    JAMIESON, WRE
    BURR, LH
    MIYAGISHIMA, RT
    FRADET, GJ
    JANUSZ, MT
    TYERS, GFO
    MACNAB, J
    CHAN, F
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1995, 60 (02): : S241 - S247
  • [2] CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PORCINE BIOPROSTHESES - COMPARISON OF STANDARD AND SUPRAANNULAR PROSTHESES AT 7 YEARS
    JAMIESON, WRE
    TYERS, GFO
    MIYAGISHIMA, RT
    JANUSZ, MT
    LING, H
    CIRCULATION, 1990, 82 (04) : 481 - 481
  • [3] CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PORCINE BIOPROSTHESES - COMPARISON OF STANDARD AND SUPRAANNULAR PROSTHESES AT 7 YEARS
    JAMIESON, WRE
    TYERS, GFO
    MIYAGISHIMA, RT
    GERMANN, E
    JANUSZ, MT
    LING, H
    CIRCULATION, 1991, 84 (05) : 145 - 152
  • [4] CARPENTIER-EDWARDS STANDARD AND SUPRAANNULAR PORCINE BIOPROSTHESES - 10 YEAR COMPARISON OF STRUCTURAL VALVE DETERIORATION
    JAMIESON, WRE
    BURR, LH
    FRANK, G
    TYERS, O
    MUNRO, AI
    CIRCULATION, 1992, 86 (04) : 699 - 699
  • [5] Comparison of Carpentier-Edwards pericardial and supraannular bioprostheses in aortic valve replacement
    Puvimanasinghe, JPA
    Takkenberg, JJM
    Eijkemans, MJC
    van Herwerden, LA
    Jamieson, WRE
    Grunkemeier, GL
    Habbema, JDF
    Bogers, AJJC
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2006, 29 (03) : 374 - 379
  • [6] A 10-year comparison of explanted Hancock-II and Carpentier-Edwards supraannular bioprostheses
    Butany, Jagdish
    Leong, Shaun W.
    Cunningham, Kristopher S.
    D'Cruz, Geoffrey
    Carmichael, Khenan
    Yau, Terrence M.
    CARDIOVASCULAR PATHOLOGY, 2007, 16 (01) : 4 - 13
  • [7] Carpentier-Edwards supraannular porcine bioprosthesis evaluation over 15 years
    Jamieson, WRE
    Ling, HT
    Burr, LH
    Fradet, GJ
    Miyagishima, RT
    Janusz, MT
    Lichtenstein, SV
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1998, 66 (06): : S49 - S52
  • [8] CARPENTIER-EDWARDS SUPRAANNULAR PORCINE BIOPROSTHESIS - NEW GENERATION BIOLOGICAL VALVE
    JAMIESON, WRE
    GEREIN, AN
    TYERS, GFO
    ALLEN, P
    MUNRO, AI
    MIYAGISHIMA, RT
    JANUSZ, MT
    BURR, LH
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KARDIOLOGIE, 1986, 75 : 245 - 250
  • [9] CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PORCINE BIOPROSTHESES - ASSESSMENT OF CLINICAL-PERFORMANCE
    JAMIESON, WRE
    ALLEN, P
    LING, H
    MIYAGISHIMA, RT
    BURR, LH
    JANUSZ, MT
    GEREIN, AN
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1988, 4 (06) : 314 - 321
  • [10] Aortic Carpentier-Edwards supraannular porcine bioprosthesis:: A 12-year experience
    Logeais, Y
    Langanay, T
    Leguerrier, A
    Rioux, C
    Chaperon, J
    Coutté, MB
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1999, 68 (02): : 421 - 425