Comparison with field methods for assessing infiltration rates

被引:21
|
作者
Pott, CA
De Maria, IC
机构
[1] Univ Estado Santa Catarina, Ctr Ciencias Agrovet, UDESC, BR-88520000 Lages, SC, Brazil
[2] IAC, Inst Agron, BR-13001970 Campinas, SP, Brazil
来源
REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIA DO SOLO | 2003年 / 27卷 / 01期
关键词
permeameter; infiltrometer; physical properties; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; RAINFALL SIMULATOR; SOIL; SORPTIVITY; RING;
D O I
10.1590/S0100-06832003000100003
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
There are various methods for assessing data on infiltration rates, but it is important to know how these methods interact with soil properties. The objective of this paper was to analyze four methods for infiltration measurement in different soil types under a no tillage system. Field experiments were performed in Campinas, Campos Novos Paulista and Pindorama, in Sao Paulo State, on Eutrudox, Hapludox and Hapladult soils, respectively. Infiltration rates were measured from September to November 2000, by the evaluation methods: constant head permeameter, pressure infiltrometer, sprinkler infiltrometer with a single nozzle, and disk permeameter. Results indicated that the methods produced different values for infiltration rates and have a varied behavior according to soil properties. The lowest infiltration rates were measured by the sprinkler infiltrometer. Where permeameter and pressure infiltrometers were used, the water movement into the soil was determined by the soil structure and when a sprinkler infiltrometer was used, the factors soil cover and particle size controlled the process.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 27
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Assessing the flexibility of managers: A comparison of methods
    Kaiser, Robert B.
    Lindberg, Jennifer T.
    Craig, S. Bartholomew
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 2007, 15 (01) : 40 - 55
  • [42] A Comparison of Methods for Assessing Mortality Risk
    Levine, Morgan E.
    Crimmins, Eileen M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN BIOLOGY, 2014, 26 (06) : 768 - 776
  • [43] COMPARISON OF 3 METHODS FOR ASSESSING ATTITUDES
    ONEAL, MR
    CHISSOM, BS
    PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1994, 78 (03) : 1251 - 1258
  • [44] Comparison of infiltration test methods for soil health assessment
    Saltiel, T. M.
    Heitman, Joshua L.
    Amoozegar, A.
    JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 2022, 77 (06) : 623 - 629
  • [45] A comparison of two methods of infiltration in breast reduction surgery
    Armour, AD
    Rotenberg, BW
    Brown, MH
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2001, 108 (02) : 343 - 347
  • [46] Comparison of methods for measuring infiltration rate of pervious concrete
    Lederle, Rita
    Shepard, Thomas
    Meza, Vanessa De La Vega
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2020, 244
  • [47] Comparison of three methods for assessing disease reaction to Mycosphaerella pinodes in field pea (Pisum sativum)
    Hwang, SF
    Zhang, R
    Chang, KF
    Gossen, BD
    Turnbull, GD
    Bing, DJ
    JOURNAL OF PLANT DISEASES AND PROTECTION, 2006, 113 (01) : 20 - 23
  • [48] RETRACTED: Infiltration Rates Variation and Its Factors Analysis in Groundwater Reservoir Infiltration Field (Retracted Article)
    Xu Danmei
    Du Shanghai
    2011 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, VOL 12, PT A, 2012, 12 : 634 - 639
  • [49] Measuring rates of gross photosynthesis and net community production in cryoconite holes: a comparison of field methods
    Telling, J.
    Anesio, A. M.
    Hawkings, J.
    Tranter, M.
    Wadham, J. L.
    Hodson, A. J.
    Irvine-Fynn, T.
    Yallop, M. L.
    ANNALS OF GLACIOLOGY, 2010, 51 (56) : 153 - 162
  • [50] A comparison of hydraulic conductivities, permeabilities and infiltration rates in frozen and unfrozen soils
    McCauley, CA
    White, DM
    Lilly, MR
    Nyman, DM
    COLD REGIONS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 34 (02) : 117 - 125