Comparison with field methods for assessing infiltration rates

被引:21
|
作者
Pott, CA
De Maria, IC
机构
[1] Univ Estado Santa Catarina, Ctr Ciencias Agrovet, UDESC, BR-88520000 Lages, SC, Brazil
[2] IAC, Inst Agron, BR-13001970 Campinas, SP, Brazil
来源
REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIA DO SOLO | 2003年 / 27卷 / 01期
关键词
permeameter; infiltrometer; physical properties; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; RAINFALL SIMULATOR; SOIL; SORPTIVITY; RING;
D O I
10.1590/S0100-06832003000100003
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
There are various methods for assessing data on infiltration rates, but it is important to know how these methods interact with soil properties. The objective of this paper was to analyze four methods for infiltration measurement in different soil types under a no tillage system. Field experiments were performed in Campinas, Campos Novos Paulista and Pindorama, in Sao Paulo State, on Eutrudox, Hapludox and Hapladult soils, respectively. Infiltration rates were measured from September to November 2000, by the evaluation methods: constant head permeameter, pressure infiltrometer, sprinkler infiltrometer with a single nozzle, and disk permeameter. Results indicated that the methods produced different values for infiltration rates and have a varied behavior according to soil properties. The lowest infiltration rates were measured by the sprinkler infiltrometer. Where permeameter and pressure infiltrometers were used, the water movement into the soil was determined by the soil structure and when a sprinkler infiltrometer was used, the factors soil cover and particle size controlled the process.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 27
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of methods for assessing renal impairment
    Sharpe, PC
    Hamilton, JS
    McCreight, KJ
    Woodside, JV
    Harty, J
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2005, 355 : S198 - S198
  • [32] COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR ASSESSING OBSERVER METAMERISM
    NAYATANI, Y
    HASHIMOTO, K
    TAKAHAMA, K
    SOBAGAKI, H
    COLOR RESEARCH AND APPLICATION, 1985, 10 (03): : 147 - 155
  • [33] Comparison of methods of assessing cycle routes
    Parkin, J.
    Coward, A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-MUNICIPAL ENGINEER, 2009, 162 (01) : 7 - 14
  • [34] A COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR ASSESSING YEAST VIABILITY
    TREVORS, JT
    MERRICK, RL
    RUSSELL, I
    STEWART, GG
    BIOTECHNOLOGY LETTERS, 1983, 5 (02) : 131 - 134
  • [35] ASSESSING BIAS - COMPARISON OF 2 METHODS
    LAGAY, BW
    PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1970, 33 (04) : 615 - 618
  • [36] A COMPARISON OF 2 METHODS OF ASSESSING ALCOHOLISM
    CAMPBELL, WG
    CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 1989, 35 : 1471 - 1475
  • [37] COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR ASSESSING POWDER ATTRITION
    KNIGHT, PC
    BRIDGWATER, J
    POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 1985, 44 (01) : 99 - 102
  • [38] COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR ASSESSING VOCAL FUNCTION
    KELMAN, AW
    GORDON, MT
    MORTON, FM
    SIMPSON, IC
    FOLIA PHONIATRICA, 1981, 33 (01): : 51 - 65
  • [39] Assessing organizational culture: A comparison of methods
    Walker, H
    Symon, G
    Davies, B
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 1996, 4 (02) : 96 - 105
  • [40] ASSESSING BIAS - COMPARISON OF 2 METHODS
    LAGAY, BW
    PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1969, 33 (04) : 615 - 618