Comparison with field methods for assessing infiltration rates

被引:21
|
作者
Pott, CA
De Maria, IC
机构
[1] Univ Estado Santa Catarina, Ctr Ciencias Agrovet, UDESC, BR-88520000 Lages, SC, Brazil
[2] IAC, Inst Agron, BR-13001970 Campinas, SP, Brazil
来源
REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIA DO SOLO | 2003年 / 27卷 / 01期
关键词
permeameter; infiltrometer; physical properties; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; RAINFALL SIMULATOR; SOIL; SORPTIVITY; RING;
D O I
10.1590/S0100-06832003000100003
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
There are various methods for assessing data on infiltration rates, but it is important to know how these methods interact with soil properties. The objective of this paper was to analyze four methods for infiltration measurement in different soil types under a no tillage system. Field experiments were performed in Campinas, Campos Novos Paulista and Pindorama, in Sao Paulo State, on Eutrudox, Hapludox and Hapladult soils, respectively. Infiltration rates were measured from September to November 2000, by the evaluation methods: constant head permeameter, pressure infiltrometer, sprinkler infiltrometer with a single nozzle, and disk permeameter. Results indicated that the methods produced different values for infiltration rates and have a varied behavior according to soil properties. The lowest infiltration rates were measured by the sprinkler infiltrometer. Where permeameter and pressure infiltrometers were used, the water movement into the soil was determined by the soil structure and when a sprinkler infiltrometer was used, the factors soil cover and particle size controlled the process.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 27
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparison of genetic and field methods for assessing capercaillie abundance
    David Baines
    Kathy Fletcher
    European Journal of Wildlife Research, 2023, 69
  • [2] A comparison of genetic and field methods for assessing capercaillie abundance
    Baines, David
    Fletcher, Kathy
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2023, 69 (06)
  • [3] A comparison of methods of assessing copper and selenium status in cattle in the field
    MacKenzie, AM
    Illingworth, DV
    Jackson, DW
    Telfer, SB
    WORLD ASSOCIATION FOR BUIATRICS - XIX CONGRESS, VOLS 1-3: VOLS 1-2: PROCEEDINGS; VOL 3: POSTER PRESENTATION, 1996, : 405 - 408
  • [4] COMPARISON OF METHODS OF ASSESSING FIELD POPULATIONS OF HETERODERA-SCHACHTII
    COOKE, DA
    MATHIAS, PL
    CHWARSZCZYNSKA, DM
    COPPOCK, LJ
    PLANT PATHOLOGY, 1983, 32 (03) : 339 - 343
  • [5] Comparison of consecutive random sample methods for assessing immunization rates at urban clinics
    Irigoyen, M
    Findley, SF
    Caesar, A
    Wallace, C
    Chen, SF
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2000, 47 (04) : 198A - 198A
  • [6] A comparison of methods for fitting allometric equations to field metabolic rates of animals
    Packard, Gary C.
    Boardman, Thomas J.
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY B-BIOCHEMICAL SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENTAL PHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 179 (02): : 175 - 182
  • [7] A FIELD COMPARISON OF 2 METHODS FOR MEASURING DCPA SOIL EVAPORATION RATES
    MAJEWSKI, MS
    MCCHESNEY, MM
    SEIBER, JN
    ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 1991, 10 (03) : 301 - 311
  • [8] A comparison of methods for fitting allometric equations to field metabolic rates of animals
    Gary C. Packard
    Thomas J. Boardman
    Journal of Comparative Physiology B, 2009, 179
  • [9] Comparison of Field Infiltration Test Methods for Permeable Pavement: Towards an Easy and Accurate Method
    Zhao, Jinhui
    Xie, Xi
    Liu, Ranbin
    Lin, Chentong
    Gu, Jiahua
    Wang, Yangyang
    Wang, Zhen
    CLEAN-SOIL AIR WATER, 2019, 47 (08)
  • [10] Assessing air infiltration rates of agricultural use ventilation curtains
    Hoff, SJ
    APPLIED ENGINEERING IN AGRICULTURE, 2001, 17 (04) : 527 - 531