Barriers and facilitators to buprenorphine use for opioid agonist treatment: protocol for a scoping review

被引:5
|
作者
Leece, Pamela [1 ]
Khorasheh, Triti [1 ]
Corace, Kimberly [2 ]
Strike, Carol [3 ]
Bayoumi, Ahmed M. [4 ]
Taha, Sheena [5 ]
Marks, Elisabeth [6 ]
Pach, Beata [6 ]
Ahamad, Keith [7 ]
Grennell, Erin [8 ]
Holowaty, Melissa [9 ]
Manson, Heather [1 ]
Straus, Sharon E. [10 ]
机构
[1] Publ Hlth Ontario, Hlth Promot Chron Dis & Injury Prevent, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Dept Psychiat, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] St Michaels Hosp, MAP Ctr Urban Hlth Solut, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Canadian Ctr Subst Use & Addict, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[6] Publ Hlth Ontario, Knowledge Serv, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] British Columbia Ctr Subst Use, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[8] Queens Univ, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Kingston, ON, Canada
[9] Queens Univ, Dept Family Med, Kingston, ON, Canada
[10] St Michaels Hosp, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2019年 / 9卷 / 12期
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
MAINTENANCE TREATMENT; PHYSICIANS; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032285
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction In the context of the opioid crisis in North America, the benefits of evidence-based opioid agonist treatments such as buprenorphine/naloxone have not been optimised due to low uptake. Numerous factors contribute to the underuse of buprenorphine, and theory-informed approaches to identify and address implementation barriers and facilitators are needed. This scoping review aims to characterise the barriers and facilitators at the patient, healthcare professional, organisation and system level according to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), and identify gaps to inform practice and policy. Methods and analysis We will conduct a scoping review using established methods and follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews. We will identify English and French-language peer-reviewed literature by searching five electronic bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO, CINAHL, and SocINDEX), from inception and use Google, websites of key organisations, and two or more custom search engines to identify relevant grey literature. Eligible records will be quantitative or qualitative studies that examine barriers and facilitators to buprenorphine use at the patient, healthcare professional, organisation and system level, and involve participants with diagnosis of opioid use disorder or professionals involved in their care. Two reviewers will be involved in independently screening, reviewing and charting the data and calibration exercises will be conducted at each stage. We will conduct descriptive analysis for the charted data, and deductively code barriers and facilitators using the TDF. Ethics and dissemination As a scoping review of the literature, this study does not require ethics approval. Our dissemination strategy will focus on developing tailored activities to meet the needs of diverse knowledge user audiences. Barriers and facilitators mapped to the TDF can be linked to evidence-based strategies for change to improve buprenorphine use and access, and enable practice to reduce opioid-related harms.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Integrating buprenorphine treatment of opioid dependence into office-based practice: A qualitative study of facilitators and barriers
    Barry, D. T.
    Jones, E. S.
    Tetrault, J. M.
    Becker, W. C.
    Irwin, K.
    Sullivan, L. E.
    O'Connor, P.
    Schottenfeld, R. S.
    Fiellin, D. A.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 23 : 331 - 332
  • [42] Opioid Medical Detoxification Compared to Opioid Agonist Treatment during Pregnancy: A Scoping Review
    Ordean, Alice
    DeVuono, Isabella
    HEALTHCARE, 2024, 12 (13)
  • [43] Barriers to initiate buprenorphine and methadone for opioid use disorder treatment with postdischarge treatment linkage
    Calcaterra, Susan L. L.
    Lockhart, Steven
    Natvig, Crystal
    Mikulich, Susan
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2023, 18 (10) : 896 - 907
  • [44] Barriers and facilitators to the use of e-health by older adults: a scoping review
    Wilson, Jessica
    Heinsch, Milena
    Betts, David
    Booth, Debbie
    Kay-Lambkin, Frances
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [45] Barriers and facilitators of public transport use among people with disabilities: a scoping review
    Mwaka, C. R.
    Best, K. L.
    Cunningham, C.
    Gagnon, M.
    Routhier, F.
    FRONTIERS IN REHABILITATION SCIENCES, 2024, 4
  • [46] Patient-reported barriers and facilitators to epidural use in labour: a scoping review
    Kirubarajan, Abirami
    Schulman, Healey
    Ajay, Amy
    Lin, Lauren
    Dong, June
    Mohmand, Zuhal
    Sobel, Mara L.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2022, 69 (11): : 1430 - 1431
  • [47] Barriers and facilitators to the use of e-health by older adults: a scoping review
    Jessica Wilson
    Milena Heinsch
    David Betts
    Debbie Booth
    Frances Kay-Lambkin
    BMC Public Health, 21
  • [48] Barriers and facilitators to office-based opioid agonist therapy prescribing and effective interventions to increase provider prescribing: protocol for a systematic review
    Nixon, Lara L.
    Marlinga, Jazmin C.
    Hayden, K. Alix
    Mrklas, Kelly J.
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, 8 (1)
  • [49] Barriers and facilitators to the use of e-health by older adults: a scoping review
    Fang, Lin
    Lung, Yu
    Hui, Gilda
    Pang, Nelson
    Smith, Malik
    Azizi, Tamana
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2024, 54 (06):
  • [50] Patient-reported barriers and facilitators to epidural use in labour: a scoping review
    Abirami Kirubarajan
    Healey Schulman
    Amy Ajay
    Lauren Lin
    June Dong
    Zuhal Mohmand
    Mara L. Sobel
    Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 2022, 69 : 1430 - 1431