Barriers and facilitators to buprenorphine use for opioid agonist treatment: protocol for a scoping review

被引:5
|
作者
Leece, Pamela [1 ]
Khorasheh, Triti [1 ]
Corace, Kimberly [2 ]
Strike, Carol [3 ]
Bayoumi, Ahmed M. [4 ]
Taha, Sheena [5 ]
Marks, Elisabeth [6 ]
Pach, Beata [6 ]
Ahamad, Keith [7 ]
Grennell, Erin [8 ]
Holowaty, Melissa [9 ]
Manson, Heather [1 ]
Straus, Sharon E. [10 ]
机构
[1] Publ Hlth Ontario, Hlth Promot Chron Dis & Injury Prevent, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Dept Psychiat, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] St Michaels Hosp, MAP Ctr Urban Hlth Solut, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Canadian Ctr Subst Use & Addict, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[6] Publ Hlth Ontario, Knowledge Serv, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] British Columbia Ctr Subst Use, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[8] Queens Univ, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Kingston, ON, Canada
[9] Queens Univ, Dept Family Med, Kingston, ON, Canada
[10] St Michaels Hosp, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2019年 / 9卷 / 12期
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
MAINTENANCE TREATMENT; PHYSICIANS; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032285
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction In the context of the opioid crisis in North America, the benefits of evidence-based opioid agonist treatments such as buprenorphine/naloxone have not been optimised due to low uptake. Numerous factors contribute to the underuse of buprenorphine, and theory-informed approaches to identify and address implementation barriers and facilitators are needed. This scoping review aims to characterise the barriers and facilitators at the patient, healthcare professional, organisation and system level according to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), and identify gaps to inform practice and policy. Methods and analysis We will conduct a scoping review using established methods and follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews. We will identify English and French-language peer-reviewed literature by searching five electronic bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO, CINAHL, and SocINDEX), from inception and use Google, websites of key organisations, and two or more custom search engines to identify relevant grey literature. Eligible records will be quantitative or qualitative studies that examine barriers and facilitators to buprenorphine use at the patient, healthcare professional, organisation and system level, and involve participants with diagnosis of opioid use disorder or professionals involved in their care. Two reviewers will be involved in independently screening, reviewing and charting the data and calibration exercises will be conducted at each stage. We will conduct descriptive analysis for the charted data, and deductively code barriers and facilitators using the TDF. Ethics and dissemination As a scoping review of the literature, this study does not require ethics approval. Our dissemination strategy will focus on developing tailored activities to meet the needs of diverse knowledge user audiences. Barriers and facilitators mapped to the TDF can be linked to evidence-based strategies for change to improve buprenorphine use and access, and enable practice to reduce opioid-related harms.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Barriers, facilitators and implementation strategies for guideline-adherence in physiotherapy: a scoping review protocol
    Reiter, Nils L.
    Rosen, Diane
    Erhart, Michael
    Vogel, Barbara
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (07):
  • [32] Facilitators and barriers to using telepresence robots in aged care settings: a scoping review protocol
    Smith, Chelsea
    Gregorio, Mario
    Hung, Lillian
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (09):
  • [33] Barriers and Facilitators Affecting Access to Health Care forPeople With Syphilis:Protocol for a Scoping Review
    Correia, Rafaela Bezerra Facanha
    Mourad, Rafaela Prudlik
    Dantas, Janmilli da Costa
    da Silva, Richardson Augusto Rosendo
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2024, 13
  • [34] Facilitators and barriers to codesigning social robots with older adults with dementia: a scoping review protocol
    Hung, Lillian
    Chen, Irene
    Wong, Karen Lok Yi
    Jackson, Lynn
    Lou, Vivian W. Q.
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (03):
  • [35] Barriers and facilitators to using feedback from clinical quality registries: a scoping review protocol
    Al-Qarni, Hussein
    Allida, Sabine M.
    Mcdonagh, Julee
    Ferguson, Caleb
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2024, 13 (01)
  • [36] Facilitators and barriers for the recruitment and retention of family physician anaesthesiologists in Canada: a scoping review protocol
    Pimentel, Juan
    Ali, Mohamed
    Chander, Nikesh
    Garcia-Ramirez, Pablo
    BMJ OPEN, 2025, 15 (03):
  • [37] Examining the barriers and facilitators for Maori accessing injury and rehabilitation services: a scoping review protocol
    Nelson, Vicky
    Lambert, Michelle
    Richard, Lauralie
    Derrett, Sarah
    Wyeth, Emma
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (02):
  • [38] A scoping review of barriers and facilitators to the integration of substance use treatment services into US mainstream health care
    Adeniran, Esther
    Quinn, Megan
    Wallace, Richard
    Walden, Rachel R.
    Labisi, Titilola
    Olaniyan, Afolakemi
    Brooks, Billy
    Pack, Robert
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE REPORTS, 2023, 7
  • [39] Allostatic load in opioid use disorder: a scoping review protocol
    Fan, Jaimie Qiuyun
    Miller, Hillary
    Adams, Amanda
    Bryan, Rebecca
    Salzman, Matthew
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (03):
  • [40] A LITERATURE REVIEW OF OPIOID AGONIST TREATMENT AND IMPLICATIONS OF DEPOT BUPRENORPHINE IN CUSTODIAL SETTINGS
    Hayward, Brendan
    Tan, Qi Ting
    Tan, Wei Rong
    Bishop, Michael
    Ranjeeta, V.
    Lintzeris, Nicholas
    Haber, Paul S.
    Roberts, Jill
    Attalla, Dena
    White, Bethany
    Hourn, Monique
    Dunlop, Adrian J.
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL REVIEW, 2019, 38 : S52 - S53