Comparative analysis of microbial DNA extraction protocols for groundwater samples

被引：7
|
作者：
Purswani, Jessica [1 ]
Manuel Martin-Platero, Antonio [2 ]
Reboleiro-Rivas, Patricia [1 ]
Gonzalez-Lopez, Jesus [1 ,2 ]
Pozo, Clementina [1 ,2 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Granada, Inst Water Research, Environm Microbiol Grp, E-18071 Granada, Spain
[2] Univ Granada, Dept Microbiol, E-18071 Granada, Spain
来源：
ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY | 2011年 / 416卷 / 02期
关键词：
MSOP; Chelex; Epicentre; FastDNA; Fastprep; DNA extraction; TGGE; Groundwater samples; DIVERSITY;
D O I：
10.1016/j.ab.2011.05.024
中图分类号：
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号：
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要：
A comparative analysis of four different DNA extraction protocols was performed to determine the best choice for groundwater microbial diversity studies using temperature gradient gel electrophoresis (TGGE) analysis. The methods used were a chelex-based method, a modified salting out procedure (MSOP), and the commercial kits Epicentre and FastDNA. Both commercial kits exhibited the greatest reproducibility in their methods; however, their band patterns were very different. The protocol that showed the highest diversity was the chelex-based method, and the one that showed the lowest diversity was the FastDNA kit. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：240 / 242
页数：3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative analysis of DNA extraction protocols for ancient soft tissue museum samples
    Zhang, Ming
    Cao, Peng
    Dai, Qing-Yan
    Wang, Yong-Qiang
    Feng, Xiao-Tian
    Wang, Hong-Ru
    Wu, Hong
    Ko, Albert Min-Shan
    Mao, Xiao-Wei
    Liu, Yi-Chen
    Yu, Li
    Roos, Christian
    Nadler, Tilo
    Xiao, Wen
    Bennett, E. Andrew
    Fu, Qiao-Mei
    ZOOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 42 (03) : 280 - +
  • [2] Comparative analysis of DNA extraction protocols for ancient soft tissue museum samples
    Ming Zhang
    Peng Cao
    Qing-Yan Dai
    Yong-Qiang Wang
    Xiao-Tian Feng
    Hong-Ru Wang
    Hong Wu
    Albert Min-Shan Ko
    Xiao-Wei Mao
    Yi-Chen Liu
    Li Yu
    Christian Roos
    Tilo Nadler
    Wen Xiao
    E.Andrew Bennett
    Qiao-Mei Fu
    Zoological Research, 2021, 42 (03) : 280 - 286
  • [3] Comparative analysis of protocols for DNA extraction from soybean caterpillars
    Palma, J.
    Valmorbida, I.
    da Costa, I. F. D.
    Guedes, J. V. C.
    GENETICS AND MOLECULAR RESEARCH, 2016, 15 (02)
  • [4] DNA extraction from microbial environmental samples
    Kuhn R.
    Böllmann J.
    Krahl K.
    Bryant I.M.
    Martienssen M.
    BIOspektrum, 2018, 24 (6) : 596 - 598
  • [5] Comparative Study of Eleven Mechanical Pretreatment Protocols for Cryptosporidium parvum DNA Extraction from Stool Samples
    Claudel, Laure
    Valeix, Nicolas
    Basmaciyan, Louise
    Pereira, Bruno
    Costa, Damien
    Vincent, Anne
    Valot, Stephane
    Favennec, Loic
    Dalle, Frederic
    MICROORGANISMS, 2021, 9 (02) : 1 - 11
  • [6] Comparison of DNA extraction protocols frozen stored blood samples
    Joshi, CG
    Rank, DN
    Brahmkshtri, BP
    Patel, AV
    Vataliya, PH
    Solanki, JV
    INDIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL, 1998, 75 (11): : 1038 - 1039
  • [7] Microbial DNA extraction from samples of varied origin
    Chaudhuri, S. Ray
    Pattanayak, A. K.
    Thakur, A. R.
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2006, 91 (12): : 1697 - 1700
  • [8] Microbial DNA extraction from samples of varied origin
    West Bengal University of Technology, BF 142, Salt Lake, Kolkata 700 064, India
    Curr. Sci., 2006, 12 (1697-1700):
  • [9] Comparative analysis of different DNA extraction protocols for optimizing DNA isolation in Eleusine coracana L.
    Gupta, Shalani
    Garg, Rashmi
    Sirohi, Anil
    VEGETOS, 2013, 26 (01): : 262 - 265
  • [10] Comparative analysis of different protocols for extraction of DNA from fish scales of Cyprinus carpio
    Li, Yanhe
    Gul, Yasmeen
    Cui, Lei
    Cao, Xiaojuan
    Wang, Weimin
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2015, 14 (03): : 382 - 387
12345