共 50 条
Full automation of total metabolic tumor volume from FDG-PET/CT in DLBCL for baseline risk assessments
被引:17
|作者:
Jemaa, S.
[1
]
Paulson, J. N.
[2
]
Hutchings, M.
[3
]
Kostakoglu, L.
[4
]
Trotman, J.
[5
]
Tracy, S.
[2
]
de Crespigny, A.
[6
]
Carano, R. A. D.
[1
]
El-Galaly, T. C.
[7
]
Nielsen, T. G.
[8
]
Bengtsson, T.
[1
,9
]
机构:
[1] Genentech Inc, 1PHC Imaging, San Francisco, CA 94080 USA
[2] Genentech Inc, Biostat, San Francisco, CA 94080 USA
[3] Rigshosp, Dept Haematol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Univ Virginia, Dept Radiol & Med Imaging, Charlottesville, VA USA
[5] Univ Sydney, Concord Repatriat Gen Hosp, Dept Haematol, Concord, NSW, Australia
[6] Genentech Inc, Clin Imaging Grp, San Francisco, CA 94080 USA
[7] Aalborg Univ Hosp, Dept Hematol, Aalborg, Denmark
[8] F Hoffmann La Roche Ltd, Pharmaceut Dev Clin Oncol, Bldg 1,Grenzarcherstr 124m, CH-4070 Basel, Switzerland
[9] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Stat, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词:
DLBCL;
FDG-PET;
Imaging;
Al;
B-CELL LYMPHOMA;
BONE-MARROW BIOPSY;
PROGNOSTIC STRATIFICATION;
NCCN-IPI;
R-IPI;
INVOLVEMENT;
PREDICTION;
PROVIDES;
D O I:
10.1186/s40644-022-00476-0
中图分类号:
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号:
100214 ;
摘要:
Background: Current radiological assessments of (18)fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) imaging data in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) can be time consuming, do not yield real-time information regarding disease burden and organ involvement, and hinder the use of FDG-PET to potentially limit the reliance on invasive procedures (e.g. bone marrow biopsy) for risk assessment. Methods: Our aim is to enable real-time assessment of imaging-based risk factors at a large scale and we propose a fully automatic artificial intelligence (AI)-based tool to rapidly extract FDG-PET imaging metrics in DLBCL. On availability of a scan, in combination with clinical data, our approach generates clinically informative risk scores with minimal resource requirements. Overall, 1268 patients with previously untreated DLBCL from the phase III GOYA trial (NCT01287741) were included in the analysis (training: n = 846; hold-out: n = 422). Results: Our AI-based model comprising imaging and clinical variables yielded a tangible prognostic improvement compared to clinical models without imaging metrics. We observed a risk increase for progression-free survival (PFS) with hazard ratios [HR] of 1.87 (95% CI: 1.31-2.67) vs 1.38 (95% CI: 0.98-1.96) (C-index: 0.59 vs 0.55), and a risk increase for overall survival (OS) (HR: 2.16 (95% CI: 1.37-3.40) vs 1.40 (95% CI: 0.90-2.17); C-index: 0.59 vs 0.55). The combined model defined a high-risk population with 35% and 42% increased odds of a 4-year PFS and OS event, respectively, versus the International Prognostic Index components alone. The method also identified a subpopulation with a 2-year Central Nervous System (CNS)-relapse probability of 17.1%. Conclusion: Our tool enables an enhanced risk stratification compared with IPI, and the results indicate that imaging can be used to improve the prediction of central nervous system relapse in DLBCL. These findings support integration of clinically informative Al-generated imaging metrics into clinical workflows to improve identification of high-risk DLBCL patients.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文