Gaseous dry deposition of atmospheric mercury: A comparison of two surface resistance models for deposition to semiarid vegetation

被引:3
|
作者
Holmes, Heather A. [1 ]
Pardyjak, Eric R. [1 ]
Perry, Kevin D. [2 ]
Abbott, Michael L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Dept Mech Engn, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Dept Atmospher Sci, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[3] Idaho Natl Lab, Idaho Falls, ID 83415 USA
关键词
ELEMENTAL MERCURY; SCIENTIFIC UNCERTAINTIES; PROFILE RELATIONSHIPS; PARAMETERIZATION; EXCHANGES; FLUXES; FOREST;
D O I
10.1029/2010JD015182
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
In the United States, atmospheric mercury (Hg) deposition, from regional and international sources, is the largest contributor to increased Hg concentrations in bodies of water leading to bioaccumulation of methyl mercury in fish. In this work, modeled dry deposition velocities (v(d)) for gaseous Hg are calculated using two surface resistance parameterizations found in the literature. The flux is then estimated as the product of the species concentration and modeled v(d). The calculations utilize speciated atmospheric mercury concentrations measured during an annual monitoring campaign in southern Idaho. Gaseous elemental mercury (GEM) and reactive gaseous mercury (RGM) were monitored with Tekran models 2537A and 1130, respectively. Two anemometers collected meteorological data, including one fast-response three-dimensional sonic anemometer to measure turbulence parameters. For the flux calculation, three resistances are required to model the mechanisms that transport gaseous Hg from the atmosphere to the surface, with the surface resistance being the largest source of error. Results from two surface resistance models are presented. In particular, the downward flux is sensitive to the choice of model and input parameters such as seasonal category and mesophyll resistance. A comparison of annual GEM and RGM fluxes calculated using the two models shows good agreement for RGM (3.2% difference for annual deposition); however, for the low-solubility species of GEM, the models show a 64% difference in annual fluxes, with a range of 32% to 200% in seasonal fluxes. Results indicate the importance of understanding the diurnal variation of the physical processes modeled in the surface resistance parameterization for v(d).
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Dry deposition of gaseous elemental mercury to plants and soils using mercury stable isotopes in a controlled environment
    Rutter, Andrew P.
    Schauer, James J.
    Shafer, Martin M.
    Creswell, Joel E.
    Olson, Michael R.
    Robinson, Michael
    Collins, Ryan M.
    Parman, Andrew M.
    Katzman, Tanya L.
    Mallek, Justin L.
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 45 (04) : 848 - 855
  • [32] Author Correction: Photoreduction of gaseous oxidized mercury changes global atmospheric mercury speciation, transport and deposition
    Alfonso Saiz-Lopez
    Sebastian P. Sitkiewicz
    Daniel Roca-Sanjuán
    Josep M. Oliva-Enrich
    Juan Z. Dávalos
    Rafael Notario
    Martin Jiskra
    Yang Xu
    Feiyue Wang
    Colin P. Thackray
    Elsie M. Sunderland
    Daniel J. Jacob
    Oleg Travnikov
    Carlos A. Cuevas
    A. Ulises Acuña
    Daniel Rivero
    John M. C. Plane
    Douglas E. Kinnison
    Jeroen E. Sonke
    Nature Communications, 13
  • [33] Impact of grazing and atmospheric nitrogen deposition on the vegetation of dry coastal dune grasslands
    tenHarkel, MJ
    vanderMeulen, F
    JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE, 1996, 7 (03) : 445 - 452
  • [34] FOREST VEGETATION AS A SINK FOR ATMOSPHERIC PARTICULATES - QUANTITATIVE STUDIES IN RAIN AND DRY DEPOSITION
    RUSSELL, IJ
    CHOQUETTE, CE
    FANG, SL
    DUNDULIS, WP
    PAO, AA
    PSZENNY, AAP
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 1981, 86 (NC6) : 5247 - 5363
  • [35] Testing and Application of Surrogate Surfaces for Understanding Potential Gaseous Oxidized Mercury Dry Deposition
    Lyman, Seth N.
    Gustin, Mae S.
    Prestbo, Eric M.
    Kilner, Philip I.
    Edgerton, Eric
    Hartsell, Ben
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 43 (16) : 6235 - 6241
  • [36] Atmospheric particulate mercury concentration in Changchun City and its dry deposition flux
    Changchun Institute of Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130021, China
    Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science, 2001, 22 (02): : 60 - 63
  • [37] Dry and Wet Deposition Fluxes and Source of Atmospheric Mercury in the Forest in Southeast China
    Dong, Hanying
    Kang, Xinyuan
    Deng, Sixin
    Huang, Minjuan
    Chang, Ming
    Wang, Xuemei
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (04)
  • [38] Application of Dry Deposition Models to Estimate Ambient Air Particulate and Particulate-Bound Mercury Hg(p) Dry Deposition
    Fang, Guor-Cheng
    Chen, Jyh-Cherng
    Wu, Yuh-Shen
    Huang, Winn-Jung
    Liu, Chia-Kuan
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2011, 28 (01) : 63 - 70
  • [39] Direct measurement of atmospheric dry deposition to natural surfaces in a semiarid region of north central India
    Kumar, R
    Rani, A
    Kumari, KM
    Srivastava, SS
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2003, 108 (D20)
  • [40] On Dry Deposition Modelling of Atmospheric Pollutants on Vegetation at the Microscale: Application to the Impact of Street Vegetation on Air Quality
    Santiago, Jose-Luis
    Martilli, Alberto
    Martin, Fernando
    BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 2017, 162 (03) : 451 - 474