Gaseous dry deposition of atmospheric mercury: A comparison of two surface resistance models for deposition to semiarid vegetation

被引:3
|
作者
Holmes, Heather A. [1 ]
Pardyjak, Eric R. [1 ]
Perry, Kevin D. [2 ]
Abbott, Michael L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Dept Mech Engn, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Dept Atmospher Sci, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[3] Idaho Natl Lab, Idaho Falls, ID 83415 USA
关键词
ELEMENTAL MERCURY; SCIENTIFIC UNCERTAINTIES; PROFILE RELATIONSHIPS; PARAMETERIZATION; EXCHANGES; FLUXES; FOREST;
D O I
10.1029/2010JD015182
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
In the United States, atmospheric mercury (Hg) deposition, from regional and international sources, is the largest contributor to increased Hg concentrations in bodies of water leading to bioaccumulation of methyl mercury in fish. In this work, modeled dry deposition velocities (v(d)) for gaseous Hg are calculated using two surface resistance parameterizations found in the literature. The flux is then estimated as the product of the species concentration and modeled v(d). The calculations utilize speciated atmospheric mercury concentrations measured during an annual monitoring campaign in southern Idaho. Gaseous elemental mercury (GEM) and reactive gaseous mercury (RGM) were monitored with Tekran models 2537A and 1130, respectively. Two anemometers collected meteorological data, including one fast-response three-dimensional sonic anemometer to measure turbulence parameters. For the flux calculation, three resistances are required to model the mechanisms that transport gaseous Hg from the atmosphere to the surface, with the surface resistance being the largest source of error. Results from two surface resistance models are presented. In particular, the downward flux is sensitive to the choice of model and input parameters such as seasonal category and mesophyll resistance. A comparison of annual GEM and RGM fluxes calculated using the two models shows good agreement for RGM (3.2% difference for annual deposition); however, for the low-solubility species of GEM, the models show a 64% difference in annual fluxes, with a range of 32% to 200% in seasonal fluxes. Results indicate the importance of understanding the diurnal variation of the physical processes modeled in the surface resistance parameterization for v(d).
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] Spatial Patterns in Wet and Dry Deposition of Atmospheric Mercury to Illinois Watersheds
    Lynam, M. M.
    Hall, N. L.
    Dvonch, J. T.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HEAVY METALS IN THE ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 1
  • [23] Estimation of dry deposition of atmospheric mercury in Nevada by direct and indirect methods
    Lyman, Seth N.
    Gustin, Mae Sexauer
    Prestbo, Eric M.
    Marsik, Frank J.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 41 (06) : 1970 - 1976
  • [24] Dry Deposition of Atmospheric Particle-Bound Mercury in the Middle Taiwan
    Fang, Guor-Cheng
    Tsai, Jen-Hsiung
    Lin, Yan-Heng
    Chang, Chia-Ying
    AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2012, 12 (06) : 1298 - 1308
  • [25] Potential of Particle Matter Dry Deposition on Green Roofs and Living Walls Vegetation for Mitigating Urban Atmospheric Pollution in Semiarid Climates
    Viecco, Margareth
    Vera, Sergio
    Jorquera, Hector
    Bustamante, Waldo
    Gironas, Jorge
    Dobbs, Cynnamon
    Leiva, Eduardo
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (07)
  • [26] Comparison of dry deposition predicted from models and measured with a water surface sampler
    Yi, SM
    Holsen, TM
    Noll, KE
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 31 (01) : 272 - 278
  • [27] Reconciling models and measurements to assess trends in atmospheric mercury deposition
    Sunderland, Elsie M.
    Cohen, Mark D.
    Selin, Noelle E.
    Chmura, Gail L.
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2008, 156 (02) : 526 - 535
  • [28] An Artificial Turf-Based Surrogate Surface Collector for the Direct Measurement of Atmospheric Mercury Dry Deposition
    Hall, Naima L.
    Dvonch, Joseph Timothy
    Marsik, Frank J.
    Barres, James A.
    Landis, Matthew S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 14 (02):
  • [29] A revised parameterization for gaseous dry deposition in air-quality models
    Zhang, L
    Brook, JR
    Vet, R
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2003, 3 : 2067 - 2082
  • [30] Chemical cycling and deposition of atmospheric mercury in polar regions: review of recent measurements and comparison with models
    Angot, Helene
    Dastoor, Ashu
    De Simone, Francesco
    Gardfeldt, Katarina
    Gencarelli, Christian N.
    Hedgecock, Ian M.
    Langer, Sarka
    Magand, Olivier
    Mastromonaco, Michelle N.
    Nordstrom, Claus
    Pfaffhuber, Katrine A.
    Pirrone, Nicola
    Ryjkov, Andrei
    Selin, Noelle E.
    Skov, Henrik
    Song, Shaojie
    Sprovieri, Francesca
    Steffen, Alexandra
    Toyota, Kenjiro
    Travnikov, Oleg
    Yang, Xin
    Dommergue, Aurelien
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2016, 16 (16) : 10735 - 10763