Development and Validation of Quality Indicators on Continuing Care for Patients With AUD: A Delphi Study

被引:8
|
作者
Bekkering, Geertruida E. [1 ]
Zeeuws, Dieter [2 ]
Lenaerts, Evelien [1 ]
Pas, Leo [1 ]
Verstuyf, Geert [3 ]
Matthys, Frieda [2 ,3 ]
Aertgeerts, Bert [1 ]
Mathei, Catharina [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Acad Ctr Gen Practice, Kapucijnenvoer 33,Blok J, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[2] Vrije Univ Brussel, UZ Brussel, Dept Psychiat, Laarbeeklaan 101, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium
[3] VAD Flemish Ctr Expertise Alcohol & Other Drugs, Vanderlindenstr 15, B-1030 Schaarbeek Brussels, Belgium
来源
ALCOHOL AND ALCOHOLISM | 2016年 / 51卷 / 05期
关键词
GUIDELINE-BASED DEVELOPMENT; IMPROVING PRIMARY-CARE; ALCOHOL-USE DISORDERS; SUBSTANCE-ABUSE; ADDICTION; OUTCOMES; ILLNESS;
D O I
10.1093/alcalc/agw044
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
To develop indicators to assess quality of continuing care for persons with alcohol use disorder (AUD). A guideline-based RAND-modified Delphi method was used to develop and validate indicators regarding the process and outcome of continuing care. We systematically searched for evidence-based guidelines and existing quality indicators. A multidisciplinary expert panel prioritized recommendations using a written questionnaire followed by a group discussion. Important recommendations were then translated to quality indicators. The panel subsequently selected indicators that were measurable and applicable in Belgium. In a final round the indicators face-validity was assessed. We extracted 69 recommendations from 06 guidelines and 17 relevant quality indicators. Of all, 13 indicators remained after 03 written rounds and 02 group discussions. This study describes a systematic approach to develop and validate quality indicators for continuing care for AUD. The final set of selected indicators consisted of 10 process and 03 outcome indicators. As the level of evidence of effective continuing care components is very low further development of the indicators is recommended. This study describes a systematic approach to develop and validate quality indicators for continuing care for AUD. The proposed set of indicators consisted of 10 process and 03 outcome indicators. As the level of evidence of effective continuing care components is very low further development of the indicators is recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:555 / 561
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Development and Validation of the Midwifery Interventions Classification for a Salutogenic Approach to Maternity Care: A Delphi Study
    Maga, Giulia
    Magon, Arianna
    Caruso, Rosario
    Brigante, Lia
    Daniele, Marina Alice Sylvia
    Belloni, Silvia
    Arrigoni, Cristina
    HEALTHCARE, 2024, 12 (22)
  • [42] Development of indicators to assess the quality of medicines reconciliation at hospital admission: an e-Delphi study
    Aljamal, Mohammed Sulaiman
    Ashcroft, Darren
    Tully, Mary P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2016, 24 (03) : 209 - 216
  • [43] Quality Indicators for In-Hospital Pharmaceutical Care of Dutch Elderly Patients Development and Validation of an ACOVE-Based Quality Indicator Set
    Wierenga, Peter C.
    Klopotowska, Joanna E.
    Smorenburg, Susanne M.
    van Kan, Hendrikus J.
    Bijleveld, Yuma A.
    Dijkgraaf, Marcel G.
    de Rooij, Sophia E.
    DRUGS & AGING, 2011, 28 (04) : 295 - 304
  • [44] Development and initial validation of prescribing quality indicators for patients with chronic kidney disease
    Smits, Kirsten P. J.
    Sidorenkov, Grigory
    Bilo, Henk J. G.
    Bouma, Margriet
    van Ittersum, Frans J.
    Voorham, Jaco
    Navis, Gerjan
    Denig, Petra
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 31 (11) : 1876 - 1886
  • [45] Content validation of quality indicators for nursing care evaluation
    Vituri, Dagmar Willamowius
    Matsuda, Laura Misue
    REVISTA DA ESCOLA DE ENFERMAGEM DA USP, 2009, 43 (02) : 426 - 434
  • [46] Identifying indicators of colorectal cancer care coordination: a Delphi study
    Young, J. M.
    Masya, L. M.
    Solomon, M. J.
    Shepherd, H. L.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2014, 16 (01) : 17 - 25
  • [47] Developing patient experience indicators for cancer care: a Delphi study
    Sansoni, Janet
    Williams, Kathryn
    Morris, Darcy
    Thompson, Cristina
    Senior, Kate
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2016, 25 : 121 - 122
  • [48] The relevance, feasibility and benchmarking of nursing quality indicators: A Delphi study
    Koch, Daniel
    Kutz, Alexander
    Conca, Antoinette
    Wenke, Juliane
    Schuetz, Philipp
    Mueller, Beat
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2020, 76 (12) : 3483 - 3494
  • [49] Quality indicators for the design and implementation of simulation experiences: A Delphi study
    Arthur, Carol
    Leyett-Jones, Tracy
    Kable, Ashley
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2013, 33 (11) : 1357 - 1361
  • [50] Quality indicators for Palliative Day Services: A modified Delphi study
    McCorry, Noleen K.
    O'Connor, Sean
    Leemans, Kathleen
    Coast, Joanna
    Donnelly, Michael
    Finucane, Anne
    Jones, Louise
    Kernohan, W. George
    Perkins, Paul
    Dempster, Martin
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2019, 33 (02) : 197 - 205