Development and Validation of Quality Indicators on Continuing Care for Patients With AUD: A Delphi Study

被引:8
|
作者
Bekkering, Geertruida E. [1 ]
Zeeuws, Dieter [2 ]
Lenaerts, Evelien [1 ]
Pas, Leo [1 ]
Verstuyf, Geert [3 ]
Matthys, Frieda [2 ,3 ]
Aertgeerts, Bert [1 ]
Mathei, Catharina [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Acad Ctr Gen Practice, Kapucijnenvoer 33,Blok J, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[2] Vrije Univ Brussel, UZ Brussel, Dept Psychiat, Laarbeeklaan 101, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium
[3] VAD Flemish Ctr Expertise Alcohol & Other Drugs, Vanderlindenstr 15, B-1030 Schaarbeek Brussels, Belgium
来源
ALCOHOL AND ALCOHOLISM | 2016年 / 51卷 / 05期
关键词
GUIDELINE-BASED DEVELOPMENT; IMPROVING PRIMARY-CARE; ALCOHOL-USE DISORDERS; SUBSTANCE-ABUSE; ADDICTION; OUTCOMES; ILLNESS;
D O I
10.1093/alcalc/agw044
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
To develop indicators to assess quality of continuing care for persons with alcohol use disorder (AUD). A guideline-based RAND-modified Delphi method was used to develop and validate indicators regarding the process and outcome of continuing care. We systematically searched for evidence-based guidelines and existing quality indicators. A multidisciplinary expert panel prioritized recommendations using a written questionnaire followed by a group discussion. Important recommendations were then translated to quality indicators. The panel subsequently selected indicators that were measurable and applicable in Belgium. In a final round the indicators face-validity was assessed. We extracted 69 recommendations from 06 guidelines and 17 relevant quality indicators. Of all, 13 indicators remained after 03 written rounds and 02 group discussions. This study describes a systematic approach to develop and validate quality indicators for continuing care for AUD. The final set of selected indicators consisted of 10 process and 03 outcome indicators. As the level of evidence of effective continuing care components is very low further development of the indicators is recommended. This study describes a systematic approach to develop and validate quality indicators for continuing care for AUD. The proposed set of indicators consisted of 10 process and 03 outcome indicators. As the level of evidence of effective continuing care components is very low further development of the indicators is recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:555 / 561
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Quality indicators for the community care of MSK conditions: An online modified-Delphi study
    Braybrooke, A.
    Burgess, R.
    Brooks, M.
    Banerjee, A.
    Hill, J. C.
    MUSCULOSKELETAL SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2025, 76
  • [22] Quality indicators for ambulatory care for older adults with diabetes and comorbid conditions: A Delphi study
    Petrosyan, Yelena
    Barnsley, Jan M.
    Kuluski, Kerry
    Liu, Barbara
    Wodchis, Walter P.
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (12):
  • [23] Quality indicators for integrating oncology and home palliative care in Japan: modified Delphi study
    Hasegawa, Takaaki
    Ochi, Takura
    Yamagishi, Akemi
    Akechi, Tatsuo
    Urakubo, Akiko
    Sugishita, Akitaka
    Yamamoto, Rie
    Kubota, Yosuke
    Shimoyama, Satofumi
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2024, 32 (07)
  • [24] Refinement of indicators and criteria in a quality tool for assessing quality in primary care in Canada: a Delphi Panel study
    Levitt, Cheryl A.
    Nair, Kalpana
    Dolovich, Lisa
    Price, David
    Hilts, Linda
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2014, 31 (05) : 607 - 621
  • [25] Development of quality indicators to monitor radiotherapy care for men with prostate cancer: A modified Delphi method
    Tsiamis, Ellie
    Millar, Jeremy
    Baxi, Siddhartha
    Borg, Martin
    De Ieso, Paolo
    Elsaleh, Hany
    Foroudi, Farshad
    Higgs, Braden
    Holt, Tanya
    Martin, Jarad
    Moretti, Kim
    Pryor, David
    Skalam, Marketa
    Evans, Sue
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 128 (02) : 308 - 314
  • [26] Prioritisation of quality indicators for elective perioperative care: a Delphi consensus
    Gilhooly, D.
    Chazapis, M.
    Moonesinghe, S. R.
    PERIOPERATIVE MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (01)
  • [27] Prioritisation of quality indicators for elective perioperative care: a Delphi consensus
    D. Gilhooly
    M. Chazapis
    S. R. Moonesinghe
    Perioperative Medicine, 9
  • [28] Development and Validation of Quality Indicators for Dementia Diagnosis and Management in a Primary Care Setting
    Perry, Marieke
    Draskovic, Irena
    van Achterberg, Theo
    van Eijken, Monique
    Lucassen, Peter
    Vernooij-Dassen, Myrra
    Rikkert, Marcel Olde
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2010, 58 (03) : 557 - 563
  • [29] Development of quality indicators for departments of hospital-based physiotherapy: a modified Delphi study
    Steenbruggen, Rudi A.
    van Oorsouw, Roel
    Maas, Marjo
    Hoogeboom, Thomas J.
    Brand, Paul
    van Der Wees, Philip
    BMJ OPEN QUALITY, 2020, 9 (02)
  • [30] Perioperative diabetes care: development and validation of quality indicators throughout the entire hospital care pathway
    Hommel, Inge
    van Gurp, Petra J.
    Tack, Cees J.
    Wollersheim, Hub
    Hulscher, Marlies E. J. L.
    BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2016, 25 (07) : 525 - 534