Dialysis adequacy predictions using a machine learning method

被引:16
|
作者
Kim, Hyung Woo [1 ]
Heo, Seok-Jae [2 ]
Kim, Jae Young [1 ,3 ]
Kim, Annie [2 ]
Nam, Chung-Mo [2 ,4 ]
Kim, Beom Seok [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Grad Sch, Dept Biostat & Comp, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Ilsan Hosp, Natl Hlth Insurance Serv, Dept Internal Med, Goyangshi, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
[4] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Prevent Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
UREA REDUCTION RATIO; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; FLOW-RATE; HEMODIALYSIS; PRESCRIPTION;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-021-94964-1
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Dialysis adequacy is an important survival indicator in patients with chronic hemodialysis. However, there are inconveniences and disadvantages to measuring dialysis adequacy by blood samples. This study used machine learning models to predict dialysis adequacy in chronic hemodialysis patients using repeatedly measured data during hemodialysis. This study included 1333 hemodialysis sessions corresponding to the monthly examination dates of 61 patients. Patient demographics and clinical parameters were continuously measured from the hemodialysis machine; 240 measurements were collected from each hemodialysis session. Machine learning models (random forest and extreme gradient boosting [XGBoost]) and deep learning models (convolutional neural network and gated recurrent unit) were compared with multivariable linear regression models. The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), root mean square error (RMSE), and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (Corr) for each model using fivefold cross-validation were calculated as performance measurements. The XGBoost model had the best performance among all methods (MAPE=2.500; RMSE=2.906; Corr=0.873). The deep learning models with convolutional neural network (MAPE=2.835; RMSE=3.125; Corr=0.833) and gated recurrent unit (MAPE=2.974; RMSE=3.230; Corr=0.824) had similar performances. The linear regression models had the lowest performance (MAPE=3.284; RMSE=3.586; Corr=0.770) compared with other models. Machine learning methods can accurately infer hemodialysis adequacy using continuously measured data from hemodialysis machines.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Modeling Amyloid Aggregates using Machine Learning and Structural Predictions
    Kotulska, Malgorzata
    Wojciechowski, Jakub
    Burdukiewicz, Michal
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 118 (03) : 6A - 6A
  • [32] Bond defaults in China: Using machine learning to make predictions
    Cui, Bei
    Ge, Li
    Grecov, Priscila
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCE, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [33] ADEQUACY OF DIALYSIS
    VAISRUB, S
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1975, 233 (04): : 357 - 357
  • [34] ADEQUACY OF DIALYSIS
    LEVIN, NW
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 1994, 24 (02) : 308 - 315
  • [35] Adequacy of dialysis
    Maduell, F
    NEFROLOGIA, 2002, 22 (02): : 111 - 134
  • [36] DIALYSIS ADEQUACY
    DEFRANCISCO, ALM
    NEFROLOGIA, 1993, 13 : 6 - 11
  • [37] Adequacy of dialysis
    Ikizler, TA
    Schulman, G
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1997, 52 : S96 - S100
  • [38] Predictions of cervical cancer identification by photonic method combined with machine learning
    Michał Kruczkowski
    Anna Drabik-Kruczkowska
    Anna Marciniak
    Martyna Tarczewska
    Monika Kosowska
    Małgorzata Szczerska
    Scientific Reports, 12 (1)
  • [39] ADEQUACY OF DIALYSIS
    BLAGG, CR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 1984, 4 (03) : 218 - 223
  • [40] Predictions of cervical cancer identification by photonic method combined with machine learning
    Kruczkowski, Michal
    Drabik-Kruczkowska, Anna
    Marciniak, Anna
    Tarczewska, Martyna
    Kosowska, Monika
    Szczerska, Malgorzata
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01):