Dialysis adequacy predictions using a machine learning method

被引:16
|
作者
Kim, Hyung Woo [1 ]
Heo, Seok-Jae [2 ]
Kim, Jae Young [1 ,3 ]
Kim, Annie [2 ]
Nam, Chung-Mo [2 ,4 ]
Kim, Beom Seok [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Grad Sch, Dept Biostat & Comp, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Ilsan Hosp, Natl Hlth Insurance Serv, Dept Internal Med, Goyangshi, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
[4] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Prevent Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
UREA REDUCTION RATIO; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; FLOW-RATE; HEMODIALYSIS; PRESCRIPTION;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-021-94964-1
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Dialysis adequacy is an important survival indicator in patients with chronic hemodialysis. However, there are inconveniences and disadvantages to measuring dialysis adequacy by blood samples. This study used machine learning models to predict dialysis adequacy in chronic hemodialysis patients using repeatedly measured data during hemodialysis. This study included 1333 hemodialysis sessions corresponding to the monthly examination dates of 61 patients. Patient demographics and clinical parameters were continuously measured from the hemodialysis machine; 240 measurements were collected from each hemodialysis session. Machine learning models (random forest and extreme gradient boosting [XGBoost]) and deep learning models (convolutional neural network and gated recurrent unit) were compared with multivariable linear regression models. The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), root mean square error (RMSE), and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (Corr) for each model using fivefold cross-validation were calculated as performance measurements. The XGBoost model had the best performance among all methods (MAPE=2.500; RMSE=2.906; Corr=0.873). The deep learning models with convolutional neural network (MAPE=2.835; RMSE=3.125; Corr=0.833) and gated recurrent unit (MAPE=2.974; RMSE=3.230; Corr=0.824) had similar performances. The linear regression models had the lowest performance (MAPE=3.284; RMSE=3.586; Corr=0.770) compared with other models. Machine learning methods can accurately infer hemodialysis adequacy using continuously measured data from hemodialysis machines.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Machine Learning for Complex Predictions
    Shawe-Taylor, John
    COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2009, 52 (11) : 96 - 96
  • [22] A Comprehensive Review on Disease Predictions Using Machine Learning Approaches
    Wani, Suhail Rashid
    Attri, Shree Harsh
    Setia, Sonia
    FOURTH CONGRESS ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, VOL 1, CIS 2023, 2024, 868 : 335 - 348
  • [23] Wave overtopping predictions using an advanced machine learning technique
    den Bieman, Joost P.
    van Gent, Marcel R. A.
    van den Boogaard, Henk F. P.
    COASTAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 166
  • [24] Water Quality Predictions for Urban Streams Using Machine Learning
    Jalagam, Lokesh
    Shepherd, Nathaniel
    Qi, Jingyi
    Barclay, Nicole
    Smith, Michael
    SOUTHEASTCON 2023, 2023, : 217 - 223
  • [25] Spinal Cord Injury AIS Predictions Using Machine Learning
    Kapoor, Dhruv
    Xu, Clark
    ENEURO, 2023, 10 (01)
  • [26] Corporate Default Predictions Using Machine Learning: Literature Review
    Kim, Hyeongjun
    Cho, Hoon
    Ryu, Doojin
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (16)
  • [27] Advancing High School Dropout Predictions Using Machine Learning
    Alam, Anika
    Bowden, A. Brooks
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION: POSTERS AND LATE BREAKING RESULTS, WORKSHOPS AND TUTORIALS, INDUSTRY AND INNOVATION TRACKS, PRACTITIONERS, DOCTORAL CONSORTIUM AND BLUE SKY, AIED 2024, 2024, 2151 : 334 - 341
  • [28] Improved Software Product Reliability Predictions using Machine Learning
    Joshi, Sanjay
    Badhe, Yogesh
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES (ICSOFT), 2021, : 245 - 252
  • [29] Data Center Predictions using MATLAB Machine Learning Toolbox
    Levy, Moises
    Raviv, Daniel
    Baker, Justin
    2019 IEEE 9TH ANNUAL COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATION WORKSHOP AND CONFERENCE (CCWC), 2019, : 458 - 464
  • [30] Accurate contact predictions using covariation techniques and machine learning
    Kosciolek, Tomasz
    Jones, David T.
    PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2016, 84 : 145 - 151