Resolving a Discrepancy in Diffusion Potentials, with a Case Study for Li-Ion Batteries

被引:37
|
作者
Bizeray, Adrien M. [1 ]
Howey, David A. [1 ]
Monroe, Charles W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Engn Sci, Oxford OX1 3PJ, England
关键词
LITHIUM-ION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1149/2.0451608jes
中图分类号
O646 [电化学、电解、磁化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
Overpotentials induced by liquid-phase composition variation can be important when electrochemical devices are operated at high current. The dominant models that describe such 'diffusion potentials' are Nernst-Planck (dilute-solution) theory and Onsager-Stefan-Maxwell (concentrated-solution) theory. Nernst-Planck flux laws emerge from Onsager-Stefan-Maxwell laws in the limit of high electrolyte dilution, and the material properties involved come into agreement. The two models yield different expressions for diffusion potentials in the dilute limit, however, because of a disparity in how electric potential is defined. As applied to lithium-ion batteries, concentrated-solution theory employs a voltage measured by a reference electrode reversible to lithium cations; this provides an unambiguous connection to a measurement process, albeit hypothetical on a local scale. After the Nernst-Planck voltage is related to such a properly referenced voltage, the discrepancy in diffusion potentials vanishes. The impact of using Nernst-Planck voltages instead of measurable voltages is illustrated by simulations of a lithium-ion battery. Terminal-to-terminal voltage is relatively unaffected, but the thermal response and internal states change significantly. (C) The Author(s) 2016. Published by ECS. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (CC BY, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse of the work in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:E223 / E229
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Computational understanding of Li-ion batteries
    Urban, Alexander
    Seo, Dong-Hwa
    Ceder, Gerbrand
    NPJ COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS, 2016, 2
  • [42] Computational modeling of Li-ion batteries
    D. Grazioli
    M. Magri
    A. Salvadori
    Computational Mechanics, 2016, 58 : 889 - 909
  • [43] Li-ion batteries: Phase transition
    Hou, Peiyu
    Chu, Geng
    Gao, Jian
    Zhang, Yantao
    Zhang, Lianqi
    CHINESE PHYSICS B, 2016, 25 (01)
  • [44] Li-ion batteries for space applications
    Isaacson, MJ
    Daman, ME
    Hollandsworth, RP
    IECEC-97 - PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTY-SECOND INTERSOCIETY ENERGY CONVERSION ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-4: VOL.1: AEROSPACE POWER SYSTEMS AND TECHNOL; VOL 2: ELECTROCHEMICAL TECHNOL, CONVERSION TECHNOL, THERMAL MANAGEMENT; VOLS 3: ENERGY SYSTEMS, RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT, POLICY IMPACTS ON ENERGY; VOL 4: POST DEADLINE PAPERS, INDEX, 1997, : 31 - 34
  • [45] How Safe Are Li-ion Batteries?
    Abraham, K. M.
    JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2023, 170 (11)
  • [46] Perspective electrolytes for Li-ion batteries
    Wieclawik, Justyna
    Chrobok, Anna
    PRZEMYSL CHEMICZNY, 2020, 99 (05): : 795 - 800
  • [47] Nanocomposite cathode for Li-ion batteries
    Winkless, Laurie
    MATERIALS TODAY, 2019, 26 : 1 - 2
  • [48] Hysteresis Modeling in Li-Ion Batteries
    Baronti, Federico
    Femia, Nicola
    Saletti, Roberto
    Visone, Ciro
    Zamboni, Walter
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2014, 50 (11)
  • [49] Negative electrodes for Li-ion batteries
    Kinoshita, K
    Zaghib, K
    JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2002, 110 (02) : 416 - 423
  • [50] Computational modeling of Li-ion batteries
    Grazioli, D.
    Magri, M.
    Salvadori, A.
    COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS, 2016, 58 (06) : 889 - 909