Chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia: primary G-CSF prophylaxis indicated during docetaxel cycles

被引:0
|
作者
van Dooijeweert, C. [1 ,2 ]
van der Wall, E. [3 ]
Baas, I. O. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Meander Med Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, Amersfoort, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Med Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
NETHERLANDS JOURNAL OF MEDICINE | 2019年 / 77卷 / 09期
关键词
Breast cancer; chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia; docetaxel; granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; G-CSF; COLONY-STIMULATING FACTORS; FEC-D CHEMOTHERAPY; ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; DOSE INTENSITY; ADULT PATIENTS; BREAST-CANCER; REAL-WORLD; MORTALITY; MANAGEMENT; TOXICITY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropaenia (FN) is a common and life-threatening adverse event, which can be largely prevented by the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-C SF); G-CSF, however is expensive and not without side effects. Although primary G-CSF prophylaxis is recommended when the risk of FN is >= 20%, it is unclear during which cycles it should be administered. This study assessed and compared the FN incidence in the neo-adjuvant or adjuvant administration of two chemotherapy regimens that are widely used in breast cancer care to provide clinically useful recommendations for G-CSF use. Methods: 221 breast cancer patients were included in this retrospective single-centre study. In total, 181 patients received three cycles of 5-flourouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide (FEC) followed by three cycles of docetaxel (3F-3D) (81.9%); 40 patients received four cycles of doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by twelve cycles of paclitaxel (4AC-12P) (18.1%). The episodes of FN, extracted from the electronic patient files, were analysed and compared. Results: Overall, FN was identified in 27.8% of patients and occurred significantly more in patients receiving 3F-3D compared to patients receiving 4AC-12P (31.5% versus 10.0%, OR 4.14, 95% CI: 1.14-12.18). Comparison of FN occurrence after first exposure to FEC (6.1%), AC (5.0%), docetaxel (20.9%), or paclitaxel (0%) showed a significantly higher risk in patients receiving docetaxel than following administration of the other three agents. Conclusions: In breast cancer treatment, compared to other frequently-used agents, monotherapy with docetaxel (100 mg/m(2)) renders a substantial risk of FN (20.9%), thereby justifying the use of primary G-CSF according to international guidelines.
引用
收藏
页码:310 / 316
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Febrile neutropenia primary prophylaxis with granulocyte-colony stimulating factors (G-CSF) in breast cancer
    Younis, T.
    Rayson, D.
    Skedgel, C.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 73
  • [32] Refining the role of pegfilgrastim (a long-acting G-CSF) for prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia: consensus guidance recommendations
    Aapro, Matti
    Boccia, Ralph
    Leonard, Robert
    Camps, Carlos
    Campone, Mario
    Choquet, Sylvain
    Danova, Marco
    Glaspy, John
    Hus, Iwona
    Link, Hartmut
    Sliwa, Thamer
    Tesch, Hans
    Valero, Vicente
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2017, 25 (11) : 3295 - 3304
  • [33] Docetaxel and cyclophosphamide as adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer: primary prophylaxis with G-CSF is required
    Lakhanpal, Roopa
    Stuart-Harris, Robin
    Chan, Arlene
    Kotasek, Dusan
    Beith, Jane
    Cuff, Katharine
    Bastick, Patricia
    Lee, Clara
    BREAST CANCER MANAGEMENT, 2013, 2 (05) : 367 - 374
  • [34] Docetaxel/cyclophosphamide (TC) chemotherapy for early breast cancer: is primary G-CSF prophylaxis necessary?
    Stanley, B.
    Macpherson, I.
    SCOTTISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 58 (03) : E44 - E45
  • [35] Docetaxel/Cyclophosphamide (TC) Chemotherapy for Early Breast Cancer: Is Primary g-csf Prophylaxis Necessary?
    McIlroy, P.
    Lumsden, G.
    Haslett, K.
    Macpherson, I. R.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2010, 70
  • [36] Pegfilgrastim in the primary prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced severe neutropenia
    Olvera Alberto, Serrano
    Fernando, Alban
    Alberto, Villalobos
    Cwilich Raquel, Gerson
    GACETA MEXICANA DE ONCOLOGIA, 2010, 9 (01): : 3 - 10
  • [37] A multicentre, randomised trial comparing schedules of G-CSF ( fi lgrastim) administration for primary prophylaxis of chemotherapy -induced febrile neutropenia in early stage breast cancer
    Clemons, M.
    Fergusson, D.
    Simos, D.
    Mates, M.
    Robinson, A.
    Califaretti, N.
    Zibdawi, L.
    Bahl, M.
    Raphael, J.
    Ibrahim, M. F. K.
    Fernandes, R.
    Pitre, L.
    Aseyev, O.
    Stober, C.
    Vandermeer, L.
    Saunders, D.
    Hutton, B.
    Mallick, R.
    Pond, G. R.
    Awan, A.
    Hilton, J.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2020, 31 (07) : 951 - 957
  • [38] G-CSF for prophylaxis of neutropenia and febrile neutropenia, anemia in cancer Guidelines on supportive treatment part 1
    Link, Hartmut
    UROLOGE, 2022, 61 (05): : 537 - 551
  • [39] Safety profile of G-CSF in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: A prospective observational study in Eastern India
    Deb, Uttiya
    Mukhopadhyay, Sandip
    Banerjee, Sanatan
    Biswas, Supreeti
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2022, 59 (04) : 493 - 498
  • [40] Should ASCO re-examine the febrile neutropenia threshold for primary G-CSF prophylaxis in breast cancer?
    Younis, Tallal
    Rayson, Daniel
    Jovanovic, Sanja
    Skedgel, Chris
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (15)