Chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia: primary G-CSF prophylaxis indicated during docetaxel cycles

被引:0
|
作者
van Dooijeweert, C. [1 ,2 ]
van der Wall, E. [3 ]
Baas, I. O. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Meander Med Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, Amersfoort, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Med Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
NETHERLANDS JOURNAL OF MEDICINE | 2019年 / 77卷 / 09期
关键词
Breast cancer; chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia; docetaxel; granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; G-CSF; COLONY-STIMULATING FACTORS; FEC-D CHEMOTHERAPY; ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; DOSE INTENSITY; ADULT PATIENTS; BREAST-CANCER; REAL-WORLD; MORTALITY; MANAGEMENT; TOXICITY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropaenia (FN) is a common and life-threatening adverse event, which can be largely prevented by the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-C SF); G-CSF, however is expensive and not without side effects. Although primary G-CSF prophylaxis is recommended when the risk of FN is >= 20%, it is unclear during which cycles it should be administered. This study assessed and compared the FN incidence in the neo-adjuvant or adjuvant administration of two chemotherapy regimens that are widely used in breast cancer care to provide clinically useful recommendations for G-CSF use. Methods: 221 breast cancer patients were included in this retrospective single-centre study. In total, 181 patients received three cycles of 5-flourouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide (FEC) followed by three cycles of docetaxel (3F-3D) (81.9%); 40 patients received four cycles of doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by twelve cycles of paclitaxel (4AC-12P) (18.1%). The episodes of FN, extracted from the electronic patient files, were analysed and compared. Results: Overall, FN was identified in 27.8% of patients and occurred significantly more in patients receiving 3F-3D compared to patients receiving 4AC-12P (31.5% versus 10.0%, OR 4.14, 95% CI: 1.14-12.18). Comparison of FN occurrence after first exposure to FEC (6.1%), AC (5.0%), docetaxel (20.9%), or paclitaxel (0%) showed a significantly higher risk in patients receiving docetaxel than following administration of the other three agents. Conclusions: In breast cancer treatment, compared to other frequently-used agents, monotherapy with docetaxel (100 mg/m(2)) renders a substantial risk of FN (20.9%), thereby justifying the use of primary G-CSF according to international guidelines.
引用
收藏
页码:310 / 316
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Endogenous granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) levels in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and in ;neutropenia related with primary diseases
    Kavgaci, H
    Ozdemir, F
    Aydin, F
    Yavuz, A
    Yavuz, M
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL & CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2002, 21 (04) : 475 - 479
  • [22] Chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia
    Temblett, Paul
    CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2008, 8 (06) : 634 - 634
  • [23] Use of colony stimulating factors (CSF) for primary prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in community oncology practices to reduce risk of febrile neutropenia (FN)
    Wong, M. D.
    Hershman, D.
    Morrison, V. A.
    Ding, B.
    Malin, J. L.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (18)
  • [24] Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia
    Yalcin, S
    Guler, N
    Kansu, E
    Ertenli, I
    Gullu, I
    Kars, A
    Akpek, G
    Barista, I
    Tekuzman, G
    Baltali, E
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1995, 31A : 591 - 591
  • [25] Primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia during adjuvant docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC) chemotherapy for breast cancer
    Yu, J. L.
    Kurin, M.
    Pasetka, M.
    Kiss, A.
    Chan, K.
    Sridhar, S. S.
    Warner, E.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 73
  • [26] Pegfilgrastim in primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia in elderly patients with hematological malignancies—bendamustine and G-CSF support
    Claudio Cerchione
    Amalia De Renzo
    Davide Nappi
    Maria Di Perna
    Roberta Della Pepa
    Novella Pugliese
    Lucio Catalano
    Fabrizio Pane
    Marco Picardi
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2019, 27 : 1587 - 1588
  • [27] A COMPARISON OF EFFICACY OF GM-CSF VERSUS G-CSF IN THE THERAPEUTIC SETTING OF CHEMOTHERAPY-INDUCED NEUTROPENIA
    MILLER, JA
    BEVERIDGE, RA
    BLOOD, 1994, 84 (10) : A22 - A22
  • [28] G-CSF FOR FEVER AND NEUTROPENIA INDUCED BY CHEMOTHERAPY - REPLY
    CRAWFORD, J
    GLASPY, JA
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1992, 326 (04): : 270 - 270
  • [29] Refining the role of pegfilgrastim (a long-acting G-CSF) for prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia: consensus guidance recommendations
    Matti Aapro
    Ralph Boccia
    Robert Leonard
    Carlos Camps
    Mario Campone
    Sylvain Choquet
    Marco Danova
    John Glaspy
    Iwona Hus
    Hartmut Link
    Thamer Sliwa
    Hans Tesch
    Vicente Valero
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2017, 25 : 3295 - 3304
  • [30] A cost-utility analysis of administration schedules of G-CSF for primary prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in early stage breast cancer: Economic evaluation alongside the REaCT-G trial
    Basulaiman, B.
    Awan, A. A.
    Hilton, J.
    Fergusson, D.
    Stober, C.
    Vandermeer, L.
    Saunders, D.
    Clemons, M.
    Thavorn, K.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2019, 30