Optimization of a Decoction Process for an Herbal Formula Using a Response Surface Methodology

被引:3
|
作者
Zhang, Xian-Fei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yang, Jun-Li [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Juan [1 ,2 ]
Shi, Yan-Ping [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Lanzhou Inst Chem Phys, Key Lab Chem Northwestern Plant Resources, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China
[2] Key Lab Nat Med Gansu Prov, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100039, Peoples R China
关键词
TRADITIONAL CHINESE MEDICINE; PERFORMANCE LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHY; ULTRASOUND-ASSISTED EXTRACTION; ASTRAGALUS-MEMBRANACEUS; CHEMICAL-ANALYSIS; POLYSACCHARIDES; ANTIOXIDANT; ROOT; DESIGN; ACID;
D O I
10.5740/jaoacint.17-0022
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
An herbal formula, Huang-Qi-Liu-Yi Tang, is a prescription medicine that has been commonly used for the treatment of prostatitis and condyloma acuminatum over the last thousand years. In this study, response surface methodology, with a Box-Behnken design (BBD), was used to optimize the decoction conditions of an herbal formula. Astragaloside, calycosin-7-glucoside, glycyrrhizic acid, liquiritin, polysaccharide, and extractum were used as multiple evaluation markers. Soak time, water-to-medicinal herb ratio, and extraction time were determined as the three main variables by single-factor experiments and further optimized to obtain the maximum yields for the six marker compounds. Data from well-designed experiments were fitted to obtain second-order polynomial equations using multiple regression analysis, and the accuracies of these equations were evaluated and verified using statistical methods. By solving the regression equations and analyzing the three-dimensional response surfaces, optimum conditions were obtained and are summarized as follows: soak time of 57 min, water-to-medicinal herb ratio of 9:1 (mL/g), and extraction time of 48 min. Under optimized conditions, the experimental yields of astragaloside, calycosin-7-glucoside, glycyrrhizic acid, liquiritin, polysaccharide, and extractum were 0.13, 0.085, 1.64, 1.56, 72.19, and 25.64%, respectively, which was in good agreement with the values predicted by the BBD.
引用
收藏
页码:1776 / 1784
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Process Optimization for Diaspore Digestion Equilibrium Using Response Surface Methodology
    Zhang, Zhengyong
    LIGHT METALS 2017, 2017, : 25 - 30
  • [12] Optimization of inulin production process parameters using response surface methodology
    Akram, Wasim
    Garud, Navneet
    FUTURE JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 6 (01)
  • [13] Optimization of inulin production process parameters using response surface methodology
    Wasim Akram
    Navneet Garud
    Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 6
  • [14] Optimization of the Parameters of the Magnetic Filtration Process Using Response Surface Methodology
    Zehra Yildiz
    Transport in Porous Media, 2011, 90 : 965 - 975
  • [15] OPTIMIZATION OF CARROT DEHYDRATION PROCESS USING RESPONSE-SURFACE METHODOLOGY
    MUDAHAR, GS
    TOLEDO, RT
    FLOROS, JD
    JEN, JJ
    JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE, 1989, 54 (03) : 714 - 719
  • [16] Optimization of Enzymatic Process for Vanillin Extraction Using Response Surface Methodology
    Gu, Fenglin
    Xu, Fei
    Tan, Lehe
    Wu, Huasong
    Chu, Zhong
    Wang, Qinghuang
    MOLECULES, 2012, 17 (08): : 8753 - 8761
  • [17] Optimization of the Parameters of the Magnetic Filtration Process Using Response Surface Methodology
    Yildiz, Zehra
    TRANSPORT IN POROUS MEDIA, 2011, 90 (03) : 965 - 975
  • [18] Optimization Process of Black Soybean Natto Using Response Surface Methodology
    Shih, Ming-Chih
    Yang, Kai-Ts'ung
    Kuo, Sue-Tzu
    JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE, 2009, 74 (06) : M294 - M301
  • [19] Optimization of stir casting process parameter using response surface methodology
    Senthilkumar, K. M.
    Sivakumar, A.
    Shivaji, Rohokale Milind
    Tamang, S. K.
    Giriraj, M.
    JOURNAL OF CERAMIC PROCESSING RESEARCH, 2022, 23 (02): : 233 - 236
  • [20] Optimization of A-TIG process parameters using response surface methodology
    Vidyarthy, Ravi Shanker
    Dwivedi, Dheerendra Kumar
    Muthukumaran, Vasudevan
    MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, 2018, 33 (07) : 709 - 717