Cancer-related chronic pain: Investigation of the novel analgesic drug candidate cebranopadol in a randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial

被引:26
|
作者
Eerdekens, Marie-Henriette [1 ]
Kapanadze, Sofia [1 ]
Koch, Erika Dietlind [1 ]
Kralidis, Georg [1 ]
Volkers, Gisela [1 ]
Ahmedzai, Sam Hjelmeland [2 ]
Meissner, Winfried [3 ]
机构
[1] Grunenthal GmbH, Aachen, Germany
[2] Univ Sheffield, Dept Oncol, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[3] Jena Univ Hosp, Dept Palliat Care, Jena, Germany
关键词
NOCICEPTIN/ORPHANIN FQ PEPTIDE; OPIOID RECEPTOR AGONIST; 1ST-IN-CLASS; PREVALENCE; CARE;
D O I
10.1002/ejp.1331
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background Cancer-related pain is a growing health problem given the increasing life expectancy of cancer patients. Opioids are commonly used to treat cancer-related pain, but carry the risk of severe side effects, limiting their use. Cebranopadol is a first-in-class drug candidate, combining nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide and opioid peptide receptor agonism. This trial examined the analgesic efficacy of cebranopadol compared with morphine prolonged release (PR) in patients with moderate-to-severe cancer-related pain. Methods This double-blind, parallel-group, multiple-dose trial was designed as noninferiority trial for efficacy of cebranopadol versus morphine PR. Planned with 524 patients, finally 126 patients were treated for up to 7 weeks (low accrual). The primary efficacy endpoint was the average amount of daily rescue medication intake (morphine immediate release) over the last 2 weeks of treatment. Results For the primary endpoint, noninferiority of cebranopadol with and superiority over morphine PR were demonstrated (Full Analysis Set: increment [95%CI] = -7.48 mg [-12.05, -2.92]; Per Protocol Set: increment [95%CI] = -4.67 mg [-9.25, -0.10]). The vast majority of patients (>= 75%, either treatment) had clinically relevant pain reduction, and noninferiority on this secondary endpoint was not shown. Mostly used doses were <= 800 mu g cebranopadol or <= 120 mg morphine PR daily. A total of 83.1% of patients on cebranopadol and 82.0% on morphine PR experienced treatment-emergent adverse events. Conclusions Cebranopadol was effective, safe and well tolerated in the dose range tested (200-1,000 mu g) in patients suffering from chronic moderate-to-severe cancer-related pain and was superior to morphine PR on the primary endpoint. Significance: Cebranopadol presents a new approach to treat cancer pain. The drug candidate was easy to titrate, safe and well tolerated, and as effective as morphine PR in patients suffering from chronic moderate-to-severe cancer-related pain
引用
收藏
页码:577 / 588
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Double-blind randomized trial of tramadol for the treatment of the pain of diabetic neuropathy
    Harati, Y
    Gooch, C
    Swenson, M
    Edelman, S
    Greene, D
    Raskin, P
    Donofrio, P
    Cornblath, D
    Sachdeo, R
    Siu, CO
    Kamin, M
    NEUROLOGY, 1998, 50 (06) : 1842 - 1846
  • [42] Melatonin for Neuropathic Pain: Protocol for a Double-blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
    Gilron, Ian
    Tu, Dongsheng
    Holden, Ronald R.
    Moulin, Dwight E.
    Duggan, Scott
    Milev, Roumen
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2022, 11 (09):
  • [43] Double-blind, randomized trial of bupropion SR for the treatment of neuropathic pain
    Semenchuk, MR
    Sherman, S
    Davis, B
    NEUROLOGY, 2001, 57 (09) : 1583 - 1588
  • [44] Assessment of the Analgesic Effect of Magnesium and Morphine in Combination in Patients With Cancer Pain: A Comparative Randomized Double-Blind Study
    Baaklini, Luis Gustavo
    Arruda, Gustavo Viani
    Sakata, Rioko Kimiko
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 34 (04): : 353 - 357
  • [45] Wisconsin Ginseng (Panax quinquefolius) to Improve Cancer-Related Fatigue: A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial, N07C2
    Barton, Debra L.
    Liu, Heshan
    Dakhil, Shaker R.
    Linquist, Breanna
    Sloan, Jeff A.
    Nichols, Craig R.
    McGinn, Travis W.
    Stella, Philip J.
    Seeger, Grant R.
    Sood, Amit
    Loprinzi, Charles L.
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2013, 105 (16): : 1230 - 1238
  • [46] Misinterpretation of the Longitudinal Results in the Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Infrared-Laser Moxibustion for Cancer-Related Fatigue
    Moran, Jose M.
    Leal-Hernandez, Olga
    Pedrera-Zamorano, Juan D.
    CANCER, 2017, 123 (16) : 3195 - 3195
  • [47] Surgicel® fibrillar as an innovative analgesic reservoir for post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy pain management: Randomized double-blind trial
    Hamed, Esam
    Herdan, Ragaa
    Taha, Ahmed M.
    AlHaddad, Abdullah
    Mostafa, Mohamed F.
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2022, 38 (01): : 542 - 549
  • [48] The analgesic efficacy of etoricoxib compared with oxycodone/acetaminophen in an acute postoperative pain model: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial
    Chang, DJ
    Desjardins, PJ
    King, TR
    Erb, T
    Geba, GP
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2004, 99 (03): : 807 - 815
  • [49] Low-dose methadone has an analgesic effect in neuropathic pain: a double-blind randomized controlled crossover trial
    Morley, JS
    Bridson, J
    Nash, TP
    Miles, JB
    White, S
    Makin, MK
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2003, 17 (07) : 576 - 587
  • [50] Abuse potential and analgesic efficacy of intravenous hydromorphone bolus administration among hospitalized patients with cancer pain: A double-blind, double dummy, randomized crossover trial
    Arthur, Joseph A.
    Reddy, Akhila
    Popat, Uday
    Halm, Josiah
    Vaughan-Adams, Nicole
    Myers, Alan
    Yang, Peiying
    De Moraes, Aline Rozman
    Laureano, Raul
    Lopez-Quinones, Irma
    Urbauer, Diana
    Hui, David
    Bruera, Eduardo
    CANCER, 2025, 131 (03)