Cancer-related chronic pain: Investigation of the novel analgesic drug candidate cebranopadol in a randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial

被引:26
|
作者
Eerdekens, Marie-Henriette [1 ]
Kapanadze, Sofia [1 ]
Koch, Erika Dietlind [1 ]
Kralidis, Georg [1 ]
Volkers, Gisela [1 ]
Ahmedzai, Sam Hjelmeland [2 ]
Meissner, Winfried [3 ]
机构
[1] Grunenthal GmbH, Aachen, Germany
[2] Univ Sheffield, Dept Oncol, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[3] Jena Univ Hosp, Dept Palliat Care, Jena, Germany
关键词
NOCICEPTIN/ORPHANIN FQ PEPTIDE; OPIOID RECEPTOR AGONIST; 1ST-IN-CLASS; PREVALENCE; CARE;
D O I
10.1002/ejp.1331
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background Cancer-related pain is a growing health problem given the increasing life expectancy of cancer patients. Opioids are commonly used to treat cancer-related pain, but carry the risk of severe side effects, limiting their use. Cebranopadol is a first-in-class drug candidate, combining nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide and opioid peptide receptor agonism. This trial examined the analgesic efficacy of cebranopadol compared with morphine prolonged release (PR) in patients with moderate-to-severe cancer-related pain. Methods This double-blind, parallel-group, multiple-dose trial was designed as noninferiority trial for efficacy of cebranopadol versus morphine PR. Planned with 524 patients, finally 126 patients were treated for up to 7 weeks (low accrual). The primary efficacy endpoint was the average amount of daily rescue medication intake (morphine immediate release) over the last 2 weeks of treatment. Results For the primary endpoint, noninferiority of cebranopadol with and superiority over morphine PR were demonstrated (Full Analysis Set: increment [95%CI] = -7.48 mg [-12.05, -2.92]; Per Protocol Set: increment [95%CI] = -4.67 mg [-9.25, -0.10]). The vast majority of patients (>= 75%, either treatment) had clinically relevant pain reduction, and noninferiority on this secondary endpoint was not shown. Mostly used doses were <= 800 mu g cebranopadol or <= 120 mg morphine PR daily. A total of 83.1% of patients on cebranopadol and 82.0% on morphine PR experienced treatment-emergent adverse events. Conclusions Cebranopadol was effective, safe and well tolerated in the dose range tested (200-1,000 mu g) in patients suffering from chronic moderate-to-severe cancer-related pain and was superior to morphine PR on the primary endpoint. Significance: Cebranopadol presents a new approach to treat cancer pain. The drug candidate was easy to titrate, safe and well tolerated, and as effective as morphine PR in patients suffering from chronic moderate-to-severe cancer-related pain
引用
收藏
页码:577 / 588
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Randomized, double-blind, phase II trial of gallium nitrate compared with pamidronate for acute control of cancer-related hyperealcemia
    Cvitkovic, FR
    Armand, JP
    Tubiana-Hulin, M
    Rossi, JF
    Warrell, RP
    CANCER JOURNAL, 2006, 12 (01): : 47 - 53
  • [22] Combination Therapy of Physical Activity an Dexamethasone for Cancer-Related Fatigue: A Phase II Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial
    Yennurajalingam, Sriram
    Valero, Vicente
    Lu, Zhanni
    Liu, Diane D.
    Busaidy, Naifa L.
    Reuben, James M.
    Fleming, Carolina Diaz
    Williams, Janet L.
    Hess, Kenneth R.
    Basen-Engquist, Karen
    Bruera, Eduardo
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2022, 20 (03): : 235 - +
  • [23] Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for pancreatic cancer related pain
    He, Lihua
    Tan, Keping
    Lin, Xianming
    Yi, Hui
    Wang, Xueliang
    Zhang, Jiangsong
    Lin, Jietao
    Lin, Lizhu
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (05) : E23748
  • [24] Analgesic efficacy of cerebral and peripheral electrical stimulation in chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized, double-blind, factorial clinical trial
    Hazime, Fuad Ahmad
    de Freitas, Diego Galace
    Monteiro, Renan Lima
    Maretto, Rafaela Lasso
    de Almeida Carvalho, Nilza Aparecida
    Hasue, Renata Hydee
    Amado Joao, Silvia Maria
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2015, 16
  • [25] Reduced pain and analgesic use after acoustic binaural beats therapy in chronic pain - A double-blind randomized control cross-over trial
    Gkolias, Vasileios
    Amaniti, Aikaterini
    Triantafyllou, Areti
    Papakonstantinou, Panagiota
    Kartsidis, Panagiotis
    Paraskevopoulos, Evangelos
    Bamidis, Panagiotis D.
    Hadjileontiadis, Leontios
    Kouvelas, Dimitrios
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2020, 24 (09) : 1716 - 1729
  • [26] Analgesic efficacy of cerebral and peripheral electrical stimulation in chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized, double-blind, factorial clinical trial
    Fuad Ahmad Hazime
    Diego Galace de Freitas
    Renan Lima Monteiro
    Rafaela Lasso Maretto
    Nilza Aparecida de Almeida Carvalho
    Renata Hydee Hasue
    Silvia Maria Amado João
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 16
  • [27] Reduction of postoperative pain: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial
    Browning, WD
    Johnson, WW
    Gregory, PN
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 128 (12): : 1661 - 1667
  • [28] Ciprofloxacin or tamsulosin in men with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome - A randomized, double-blind trial
    Alexander, RB
    Propert, KJ
    Schaeffer, AJ
    Landis, JR
    Nickel, JC
    O'Leary, MP
    Pontari, MA
    McNaughton-Collins, M
    Shoskes, DA
    Comiter, CV
    Datta, NS
    Fowler, JE
    Nadler, RB
    Zeitlin, SI
    Knauss, JS
    Wang, YL
    Kusek, JW
    Nyberg, LM
    Litwin, MS
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 141 (08) : 581 - 589
  • [29] GALLIUM NITRATE FOR ACUTE TREATMENT OF CANCER-RELATED HYPERCALCEMIA - A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON TO CALCITONIN
    WARRELL, RP
    ISRAEL, R
    FRISONE, M
    SNYDER, T
    GAYNOR, JJ
    BOCKMAN, RS
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1988, 108 (05) : 669 - 674
  • [30] Fulranumab as Adjunctive Therapy for Cancer-Related Pain: A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study
    Slatkin, Neal
    Zaki, Naim
    Wang, Steven
    Louie, John
    Sanga, Panna
    Kelly, Kathleen M.
    Thipphawong, John
    JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2019, 20 (04): : 440 - 452