Cancer-related chronic pain: Investigation of the novel analgesic drug candidate cebranopadol in a randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial

被引:26
|
作者
Eerdekens, Marie-Henriette [1 ]
Kapanadze, Sofia [1 ]
Koch, Erika Dietlind [1 ]
Kralidis, Georg [1 ]
Volkers, Gisela [1 ]
Ahmedzai, Sam Hjelmeland [2 ]
Meissner, Winfried [3 ]
机构
[1] Grunenthal GmbH, Aachen, Germany
[2] Univ Sheffield, Dept Oncol, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[3] Jena Univ Hosp, Dept Palliat Care, Jena, Germany
关键词
NOCICEPTIN/ORPHANIN FQ PEPTIDE; OPIOID RECEPTOR AGONIST; 1ST-IN-CLASS; PREVALENCE; CARE;
D O I
10.1002/ejp.1331
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background Cancer-related pain is a growing health problem given the increasing life expectancy of cancer patients. Opioids are commonly used to treat cancer-related pain, but carry the risk of severe side effects, limiting their use. Cebranopadol is a first-in-class drug candidate, combining nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide and opioid peptide receptor agonism. This trial examined the analgesic efficacy of cebranopadol compared with morphine prolonged release (PR) in patients with moderate-to-severe cancer-related pain. Methods This double-blind, parallel-group, multiple-dose trial was designed as noninferiority trial for efficacy of cebranopadol versus morphine PR. Planned with 524 patients, finally 126 patients were treated for up to 7 weeks (low accrual). The primary efficacy endpoint was the average amount of daily rescue medication intake (morphine immediate release) over the last 2 weeks of treatment. Results For the primary endpoint, noninferiority of cebranopadol with and superiority over morphine PR were demonstrated (Full Analysis Set: increment [95%CI] = -7.48 mg [-12.05, -2.92]; Per Protocol Set: increment [95%CI] = -4.67 mg [-9.25, -0.10]). The vast majority of patients (>= 75%, either treatment) had clinically relevant pain reduction, and noninferiority on this secondary endpoint was not shown. Mostly used doses were <= 800 mu g cebranopadol or <= 120 mg morphine PR daily. A total of 83.1% of patients on cebranopadol and 82.0% on morphine PR experienced treatment-emergent adverse events. Conclusions Cebranopadol was effective, safe and well tolerated in the dose range tested (200-1,000 mu g) in patients suffering from chronic moderate-to-severe cancer-related pain and was superior to morphine PR on the primary endpoint. Significance: Cebranopadol presents a new approach to treat cancer pain. The drug candidate was easy to titrate, safe and well tolerated, and as effective as morphine PR in patients suffering from chronic moderate-to-severe cancer-related pain
引用
收藏
页码:577 / 588
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cebranopadol, a Novel First-in-Class Analgesic Drug Candidate: First Experience With Cancer-Related Pain for up to 26 Weeks
    Koch, E. Dietlind
    Kapanadze, Sofia
    Eerdekens, Marie-Henriette
    Kralidis, Georg
    Letal, Jiri
    Sabatschus, Ingo
    Ahmedzai, Sam H.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2019, 58 (03) : 390 - 399
  • [2] Novel approach for cancer-related fatigue: A double-blind randomized clinical trial.
    De Melo Sette, Claudia Vaz
    Ribas de Alcantara, Barbara Bonaparte
    Cruz, Felipe Melo
    Maselli Schoueri, Jean Henri
    Gomes Cubero, Daniel de Iracema
    Del Giglio, Auro
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35 (31)
  • [3] Cebranopadol, a novel first-in-class analgesic drug candidate: first experience in patients with chronic low back pain in a randomized clinical trial
    Christoph, Annette
    Eerdekens, Marie-Henriette
    Kok, Maurits
    Volkers, Gisela
    Freynhagen, Rainer
    PAIN, 2017, 158 (09) : 1813 - 1824
  • [4] Comparison of two doses of ketoprofen to treat pain: a double-blind, randomized, noninferiority trial
    Riou, Bruno
    Plaisance, Patrick
    Lecomte, Francois
    Soulat, Louis
    Orcel, Philippe
    Mazoit, Jean-Xavier
    FUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2014, 28 (01) : 20 - 28
  • [5] Preventive Analgesic Efficacy of Nefopam in Acute and Chronic Pain After Breast Cancer Surgery A Prospective, Double-Blind, and Randomized Trial
    Na, Hyo-Seok
    Oh, Ah-Young
    Koo, Bon-Wook
    Lim, Dae-Jin
    Ryu, Jung-Hee
    Han, Ji-Won
    MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (20)
  • [6] DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF PIROXICAM AND CODEINE IN CANCER PAIN
    STAQUET, M
    RENAUD, A
    CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 1993, 53 (04): : 435 - 440
  • [7] Tetrodotoxin for Moderate to Severe Cancer-Related Pain: A Multicentre, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Design Trial
    Hagen, Neil A.
    Cantin, Lyne
    Constant, John
    Haller, Tina
    Blaise, Gilbert
    Ong-Lam, May
    du Souich, Patrick
    Korz, Walter
    Lapointe, Bernard
    PAIN RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT, 2017, 2017
  • [8] KETOROLAC, A NEW NONOPIOID ANALGESIC - A DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL VERSUS PENTAZOCINE IN CANCER PAIN
    ESTAPE, J
    VINOLAS, N
    GONZALEZ, B
    INGLES, F
    BOFILL, T
    GUZMAN, MC
    TARRAGO, E
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 1990, 18 (04) : 298 - 304
  • [9] A randomized double-blind clinical trial on analgesic efficacy of fluoxetine for persistent somatoform pain disorder
    Luo, Yan-Li
    Zhang, Ming-Yuan
    Wu, Wen-Yuan
    Li, Chun-Bo
    Lu, Zheng
    Li, Qing-Wei
    PROGRESS IN NEURO-PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY & BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2009, 33 (08): : 1522 - 1525
  • [10] A randomized, double-blind crossover trial of sertraline in women with chronic pelvic pain
    Engel, CC
    Walker, EA
    Engel, AL
    Bullis, J
    Armstrong, A
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 1998, 44 (02) : 203 - 207