Comparison of extraction methods for recovery of extracellular β-glucosidase in two different forest soils

被引:31
|
作者
Masciandaro, Grazia [1 ]
Macci, Cristina [1 ]
Doni, Serena [1 ]
Maserti, Bianca Elena [2 ]
Leo, A. Calvo-Bado [3 ]
Ceccanti, Brunello [1 ]
Wellington, Elizabeth [3 ]
机构
[1] CNR, Inst Ecosyst Studies, I-56124 Pisa, Italy
[2] CNR, Inst Biophys, I-56124 Pisa, Italy
[3] Univ Warwick, Dept Biol Sci, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
来源
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY | 2008年 / 40卷 / 09期
关键词
forest soil; protein extractants; extracellular proteins; enzyme activity; humic substance; SDS-PAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.05.001
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
A study was made of the efficiency of three different extractants, 0.1 M sodium pyrophosphate (pH 7), 67 mM phosphate buffer (pH 6) and 0.5 M potassium sulphate (pH 6.6), in recovering the protein quantity and the beta-glucosidase enzyme activity from two natural forest soils: (1) an inceptisoil located in Tuscany (Italy) in a mild Mediterranean climate, and (2) a Lithic Calcixeroll soil located in Murcia (southeast of Spain) in a dry-semiarid climate. The pyrophosphate was used to determine the activity of extracellular-humic-bound proteins, while the phosphate buffer and potassium sulphate were used to extract dissolved extracellular proteins. The latter extractant, after chloroform fumigation, was also used to measure total proteins in soil. A preliminary screening, using SDS-PAGE in one dimension, was also carried out in order to optimize the separation condition of soil proteins extracted with different buffers. To remove the interfering co-extracted substances (humic acid) a purification step using a column packed with insoluble polyvinylpyrrolidone was performed. The highest beta-glucosidase activity was recovered in the pyrophosphate extract, thus confirming its capability of extracting humic-bound beta-glucosidase enzyme in a stable and active form. The extractants performed differently with the two soil types and band patterns obtained with SDS-PAGE were extractant-specific, demonstrating that each was selective for a particular class of proteins. Surprisingly, protein bands were also obtained using pyrophosphate, in spite of the very dark extract colour due to the presence of humic substances. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2156 / 2161
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Efficiency of solvent extraction methods for the determination of methyl mercury in forest soils
    Qian, J
    Skyllberg, U
    Tu, Q
    Bleam, WF
    Frech, W
    FRESENIUS JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2000, 367 (05): : 467 - 473
  • [32] Comparison of methods for fluoride extraction from forest and cropped soils in vicinity of an aluminum smelter in Galicia (NW Spain)
    Rodríguez, CG
    Rodríguez, EA
    Marcos, MLF
    COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 2001, 32 (15-16) : 2503 - 2517
  • [33] Comparison of methods for determining bulk densities of rocky forest soils
    Page-Dumroese, DS
    Jurgensen, MF
    Brown, RE
    Mroz, GD
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1999, 63 (02) : 379 - 383
  • [34] Comparison of Different Extraction Methods for the Phenolic Compounds Recovery with the Antioxidant Activity of Bougainvillea x buttiana
    Abarca-Vargas, Rodolfo
    Petricevich, Vera L.
    CURRENT ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2020, 16 (06) : 778 - 787
  • [35] EVALUATION OF MICROBIAL PHOSPHORUS: COMPARISON OF DETERMINATION METHODS IN FOREST SOILS
    de Albuquerque Villani, Ecila Merces
    de Barros, Nairam Felix
    Novais, Roberto Ferreira
    Mendonca, Eduardo de Sa
    Zocolo, Guilherme Juliao
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIA DO SOLO, 2009, 33 (04): : 1061 - 1069
  • [36] Comparison of different methods of Ritz vectors extraction
    Mendrok, K
    Uhl, T
    DAMAGE ASSESSMENT OF STRUCTURES VI, 2005, 293-294 : 143 - 150
  • [37] COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT EXTRACTION METHODS OF ALTERNARIA ALLERGENS
    PARIS, S
    FITTING, C
    RAMIREZ, E
    LATGE, JP
    DAVID, B
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1990, 85 (05) : 941 - 948
  • [38] COMPARISON OF 3 DIFFERENT EXTRACTION METHODS FOR TURBELLARIA
    MARTENS, PM
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 1984, 14 (2-3) : 229 - 234
  • [39] A comparison of red cell recovery between two different methods of red cell washing
    Waters, JH
    Potter, P
    Hobson, DF
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2003, 97 (06): : 1578 - 1581
  • [40] Comparison of posterior capsule opacification after two different surgical methods of cataract extraction
    Nekolova, Jana
    Pozlerova, Jana
    Jiraskova, Nada
    Rozsival, Pavel
    Kadlecova, Jana
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2008, 145 (03) : 493 - 498