Efficiency of solvent extraction methods for the determination of methyl mercury in forest soils

被引:38
|
作者
Qian, J
Skyllberg, U
Tu, Q
Bleam, WF
Frech, W [1 ]
机构
[1] Umea Univ, Dept Analyt Chem, S-90187 Umea, Sweden
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Soil Sci, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[3] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Forest Ecol, S-90183 Umea, Sweden
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s002160000364
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Methyl mercury was determined by gas chromatography, microwave induced plasma, atomic emission spectrometry (GC-MIP-AES) using two different methods. One was based on extraction of mercury species into toluene, pre-concentration by evaporation and butylation of methyl mercury with a Grignard reagent followed by determination. With the other, methyl mercury was extracted into dichloromethane and back extracted into water followed by in situ ethylation, collection of ethylated mercury species on Tenax and determination. The accuracy of the entire procedure based on butylation was validated for the individual steps involved in the method. Methyl mercury added to various types of soil samples showed an overall average recovery of 87.5%. Reduced recovery was only caused by losses of methyl mercury during extraction into toluene and during pre-concentration by evaporation. The extraction of methyl mercury added to the soil was therefore quantitative. Since it is not possible to directly determine the extraction efficiency of incipient methyl mercury, the extraction efficiency of total mercury with an acidified solution containing CuSO4 and KBr was compared with high-pressure microwave acid digestion. The solvent extraction efficiency was 93%. For the IAEA 356 sediment certified reference material, mercury was less efficiently extracted and determined methyl mercury concentrations were below the certified value. Incomplete extraction could be explained by the presence of a large part of inorganic sulfides, as determined by x-ray absorption near-edge structure spectroscopy (XANES). Analyses of sediment reference material CRM 580 gave results in agreement with the certified value. The butylation method gave a detection limit for methyl mercury of 0.1 ng g(-1), calculated as three times the standard deviation for repeated analysis of soil samples. Lower values were obtained with the ethylation method. The precision, expressed as RSD for concentrations 20 times above the detection limit, was typically 5%.
引用
收藏
页码:467 / 473
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficiency of solvent extraction methods for the determination of methyl mercury in forest soils
    J. Qian
    U. Skyllberg
    Q. Tu
    W.F. Bleam
    W. Frech
    Fresenius' Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 2000, 367 : 467 - 473
  • [2] Mercury Geochemistry and Analytical Methods of Determination and Fractionation of Mercury in Soils and Plants
    Hlodak, M.
    Matus, P.
    Urik, M.
    CHEMICKE LISTY, 2014, 108 (12): : 1119 - 1124
  • [3] EXTRACTION AND DETERMINATION OF SULFUR IN ORGANIC HORIZONS OF FOREST SOILS
    MAYNARD, DG
    KALRA, YP
    RADFORD, FG
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1987, 51 (03) : 801 - 805
  • [4] Determination of suitable chemical extraction methods for the available iron content of brown forest soils in Turkey
    Adiloglu, Aydin
    EURASIAN SOIL SCIENCE, 2006, 39 (09) : 961 - 967
  • [5] Determination of suitable chemical extraction methods for the available iron content of brown forest soils in Turkey
    Aydin Adiloglu
    Eurasian Soil Science, 2006, 39 : 961 - 967
  • [6] SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC DETERMINATION OF MERCURY(II) BY SOLVENT EXTRACTION WITH NEUTRAL RED
    TSUBOUCH.M
    NAKAMURA, T
    TANAKA, M
    NIPPON KAGAKU ZASSHI, 1970, 91 (11): : 1095 - &
  • [7] DETERMINATION OF MERCURY(II) BY SOLVENT EXTRACTION-POLAROGRAPHIC METHOD
    KAMBARA, T
    ISHII, T
    HASEBE, K
    NIPPON KAGAKU KAISHI, 1972, (05) : 920 - &
  • [8] Solvent extraction and determination of mercury(II) using triphenylarsine oxide
    Vartak, SV
    Shinde, VM
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY SECTION A-INORGANIC BIO-INORGANIC PHYSICAL THEORETICAL & ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1997, 36 (11): : 1005 - 1007
  • [9] Evaluation of Mercury Removal Efficiency of Coal through Solvent Extraction Procedures
    Guo, Shaoqing
    Zhang, Linchao
    Dong, Yi
    Gao, Libing
    Cao, Yanzhi
    Wei, Xian-Xian
    Liang, Lei
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2019, 33 (09) : 8145 - 8150
  • [10] Solvent extraction—atomic absorption determination of chromium(VI) in soils
    Ya. I. Korenman
    S. Kopach
    Ya. Kalembkievich
    L. Filar
    B. Papchak
    Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 2000, 55 : 25 - 28