Efficiency of solvent extraction methods for the determination of methyl mercury in forest soils

被引:38
|
作者
Qian, J
Skyllberg, U
Tu, Q
Bleam, WF
Frech, W [1 ]
机构
[1] Umea Univ, Dept Analyt Chem, S-90187 Umea, Sweden
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Soil Sci, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[3] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Forest Ecol, S-90183 Umea, Sweden
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s002160000364
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Methyl mercury was determined by gas chromatography, microwave induced plasma, atomic emission spectrometry (GC-MIP-AES) using two different methods. One was based on extraction of mercury species into toluene, pre-concentration by evaporation and butylation of methyl mercury with a Grignard reagent followed by determination. With the other, methyl mercury was extracted into dichloromethane and back extracted into water followed by in situ ethylation, collection of ethylated mercury species on Tenax and determination. The accuracy of the entire procedure based on butylation was validated for the individual steps involved in the method. Methyl mercury added to various types of soil samples showed an overall average recovery of 87.5%. Reduced recovery was only caused by losses of methyl mercury during extraction into toluene and during pre-concentration by evaporation. The extraction of methyl mercury added to the soil was therefore quantitative. Since it is not possible to directly determine the extraction efficiency of incipient methyl mercury, the extraction efficiency of total mercury with an acidified solution containing CuSO4 and KBr was compared with high-pressure microwave acid digestion. The solvent extraction efficiency was 93%. For the IAEA 356 sediment certified reference material, mercury was less efficiently extracted and determined methyl mercury concentrations were below the certified value. Incomplete extraction could be explained by the presence of a large part of inorganic sulfides, as determined by x-ray absorption near-edge structure spectroscopy (XANES). Analyses of sediment reference material CRM 580 gave results in agreement with the certified value. The butylation method gave a detection limit for methyl mercury of 0.1 ng g(-1), calculated as three times the standard deviation for repeated analysis of soil samples. Lower values were obtained with the ethylation method. The precision, expressed as RSD for concentrations 20 times above the detection limit, was typically 5%.
引用
收藏
页码:467 / 473
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] DETERMINATION OF TRACE AMOUNT OF IRON(III) IN MERCURY USING SOLVENT-EXTRACTION
    SAKANO, T
    SEIKI, Y
    TOMARI, Y
    JAPAN ANALYST, 1973, 22 (08): : 1064 - 1067
  • [23] Solvent extraction-atomic absorption determination of selenium in waters, plants, and soils
    Torgov, VG
    Demidova, MG
    Kosolapov, AD
    JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1998, 53 (09) : 846 - 851
  • [24] Methyl Mercury Formation in Hillslope Soils of Boreal Forests: The Role of Forest Harvest and Anaerobic Microbes
    Kronberg, Rose-Marie
    Jiskra, Martin
    Wiederhold, Jan G.
    Bjorn, Erik
    Skyllberg, Ulf
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 50 (17) : 9177 - 9186
  • [25] FEATURES OF EXTRACTION IN MERCURY(II)-BROMIDE-METHYL GREEN-ORGANIC SOLVENT SYSTEMS
    TARAYAN, VM
    MIRZOYAN, FM
    LEBEDEVA, SP
    BAGREEV, VV
    ZOLOTOV, YA
    JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY OF THE USSR, 1974, 29 (12): : 2040 - 2042
  • [26] DETERMINATION OF METHYL MERCURY IN URINE
    ROSS, RT
    GONZALEZ, JG
    BULLETIN OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION AND TOXICOLOGY, 1973, 10 (03) : 187 - 192
  • [27] Comparison of extraction methods for recovery of extracellular β-glucosidase in two different forest soils
    Masciandaro, Grazia
    Macci, Cristina
    Doni, Serena
    Maserti, Bianca Elena
    Leo, A. Calvo-Bado
    Ceccanti, Brunello
    Wellington, Elizabeth
    SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2008, 40 (09): : 2156 - 2161
  • [28] SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC DETERMINATION OF THIOCYANATE BY SOLVENT-EXTRACTION WITH MERCURY(II)-METHYLTHYMOLBLUE IN PRESENCE OF ZEPHIRAMINE
    NOMURA, T
    TAKEMUR, S
    NAKAMURA, T
    KOMATSU, S
    JAPAN ANALYST, 1973, 22 (05): : 576 - 580
  • [29] Comparison of some extraction methods for determination of sulphur in soils of the Czech Republic
    Zbíral, J
    ROSTLINNA VYROBA, 1999, 45 (10): : 439 - 444
  • [30] COMPARISON OF IGNITION AND EXTRACTION METHODS FOR DETERMINATION OF ORGANIC PHOSPHATE IN ROCKS AND SOILS
    WILLIAMS, JD
    WALKER, TW
    PLANT AND SOIL, 1967, 27 (03) : 457 - +