7 Tesla (T) human cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging using FLASH and SSFP to assess cardiac function: validation against 1.5 T and 3 T.

被引:46
|
作者
Suttie, J. J. [1 ]
DelaBarre, L. [2 ]
Pitcher, A. [1 ]
van de Moortele, P. F. [2 ]
Dass, S. [1 ]
Snyder, C. J. [2 ]
Francis, J. M. [1 ]
Metzger, G. J. [2 ]
Weale, P. [3 ]
Ugurbil, K. [2 ]
Neubauer, S. [1 ]
Robson, M. [1 ]
Vaughan, T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Ctr Clin Magnet Resonance Res, Oxford, England
[2] Univ Minnesota, Dept Radiol, Ctr Magnet Resonance Res, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[3] Siemens Healthcare, Cardiovasc MR Res & Dev, Chicago, IL USA
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
7; Tesla; high field strength; cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging; cardiac function; clinical validation; MASS;
D O I
10.1002/nbm.1708
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
We report the first comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) at 1.5T, 3T and 7T field strengths using steady state free precession (SSFP) and fast low angle shot (FLASH) cine sequences. Cardiac volumes and mass measurements were assessed for feasibility, reproducibility and validity at each given field strength using FLASH and SSFP sequences. Ten healthy volunteers underwent retrospectively electrocardiogram (ECG) gated CMR at 1.5T, 3T and 7T using FLASH and SSFP sequences. B1 and B0 shimming and frequency scouts were used to optimise image quality. Cardiac volume and mass measurements were not significantly affected by field strength when using the same imaging sequence (P>0.05 for all parameters at 1.5T, 3T and 7T). SSFP imaging returned larger end diastolic and end systolic volumes and smaller left ventricular masses than FLASH imaging at 7T, and at the lower field strengths (P<0.05 for each parameter). However, univariate general linear model analysis with fixed effects for sequence and field strengths found an interaction between imaging sequence and field strength (P=0.03), with a smaller difference in volumes and mass measurements between SSFP and FLASH imaging at 7T than 1.5T and 3T. SSFP and FLASH cine imaging at 7T is technically feasible and provides valid assessment of cardiac volumes and mass compared with CMR imaging at 1.5T and 3T field strengths. Copyright (c) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 34
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Three-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Wrist: Diagnostic Performance Compared to 1.5-T
    Stehling, Christoph
    Langer, Martin
    Bachmann, Rainald
    Kraemer, Stefan
    Kooijman, Hendrik
    Heindel, Walter
    Vieth, Volker
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2009, 33 (06) : 934 - 939
  • [32] Myocardial iron assessment by T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 3 Tesla
    Mohammed H Alam
    Gillian C Smith
    Taigang He
    John Paul Carpenter
    Arun J Baksi
    Ricardo Wage
    Peter Drivas
    Karen Symmonds
    David Firmin
    Dudley J Pennell
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 16 (Suppl 1)
  • [33] Myocardial iron assessment by T1 cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 3 Tesla
    Mohammed H Alam
    Taigang He
    Gillian C Smith
    Arun J Baksi
    Ricardo Wage
    Peter Drivas
    Yanqiu Feng
    David Firmin
    Dudley J Pennell
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 16 (Suppl 1)
  • [34] Feasibility of cardiac-synchronized quantitative T1 and T2 mapping on a hybrid 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging and linear accelerator system
    Akdag, Osman
    Mandija, Stefano
    van Lier, Astrid L. H. M. W.
    Borman, Pim T. S.
    Schakel, Tim
    Alberts, Eveline
    van der Heide, Oscar
    Hassink, Rutger J.
    Verhoeff, Joost J. C.
    Hoesein, Firdaus A. A. Mohamed
    Raaymakers, Bas W.
    Fast, Martin F.
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 21 : 153 - 159
  • [35] K-T sense-accelerated myocardial perfusion magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla: Comparison with 1.5 Tesla
    Schwitter, J.
    Kozerke, S.
    Maredia, N.
    Suerder, D.
    Greenwood, J. P.
    Boesiger, P.
    Plein, S.
    HEART, 2008, 94 : A82 - A83
  • [36] Standardized structural magnetic resonance imaging in multicentre studies using quantitative T1 and T2 imaging at 1.5 T
    Deoni, Sean C. L.
    Williams, Steven C. R.
    Jezzard, Peter
    Suckling, John
    Murphy, Declan G. M.
    Jones, Derek K.
    NEUROIMAGE, 2008, 40 (02) : 662 - 671
  • [37] Short Term Effects of Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Excitability of the Motor Cortex at 1.5T and 7T
    Schlamann, Marc
    Yoon, Min-Suk
    Maderwald, Stefan
    Pietrzyk, Thomas
    Bitz, Andreas K.
    Gerwig, Marcus
    Forsting, Michael
    Ladd, Susanne C.
    Ladd, Mark E.
    Kastrup, Oliver
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2010, 17 (03) : 277 - 281
  • [38] Magnetic resonance imaging T1 relaxation times for the liver, pancreas and spleen in healthy children at 1.5 and 3 tesla
    Leah A. Gilligan
    Jonathan R. Dillman
    Jean A. Tkach
    Stavra A. Xanthakos
    Jacqueline K. Gill
    Andrew T. Trout
    Pediatric Radiology, 2019, 49 : 1018 - 1024
  • [39] Application of Machine learning to predict RF heating of cardiac leads during magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T and 3 T: A simulation study
    Chen, Xinlu
    Zheng, Can
    Golestanirad, L.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2023, 349
  • [40] GATED CARDIAC MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING (MRI) - EVALUATION OF ANATOMY USING 1.5T AND 0.6T FIELD STRENGTHS
    FEIGLIN, DH
    ODONNELL, JK
    GO, RT
    MACINTYRE, WJ
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1986, 27 (06) : 985 - 986