7 Tesla (T) human cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging using FLASH and SSFP to assess cardiac function: validation against 1.5 T and 3 T.

被引:46
|
作者
Suttie, J. J. [1 ]
DelaBarre, L. [2 ]
Pitcher, A. [1 ]
van de Moortele, P. F. [2 ]
Dass, S. [1 ]
Snyder, C. J. [2 ]
Francis, J. M. [1 ]
Metzger, G. J. [2 ]
Weale, P. [3 ]
Ugurbil, K. [2 ]
Neubauer, S. [1 ]
Robson, M. [1 ]
Vaughan, T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Ctr Clin Magnet Resonance Res, Oxford, England
[2] Univ Minnesota, Dept Radiol, Ctr Magnet Resonance Res, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[3] Siemens Healthcare, Cardiovasc MR Res & Dev, Chicago, IL USA
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
7; Tesla; high field strength; cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging; cardiac function; clinical validation; MASS;
D O I
10.1002/nbm.1708
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
We report the first comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) at 1.5T, 3T and 7T field strengths using steady state free precession (SSFP) and fast low angle shot (FLASH) cine sequences. Cardiac volumes and mass measurements were assessed for feasibility, reproducibility and validity at each given field strength using FLASH and SSFP sequences. Ten healthy volunteers underwent retrospectively electrocardiogram (ECG) gated CMR at 1.5T, 3T and 7T using FLASH and SSFP sequences. B1 and B0 shimming and frequency scouts were used to optimise image quality. Cardiac volume and mass measurements were not significantly affected by field strength when using the same imaging sequence (P>0.05 for all parameters at 1.5T, 3T and 7T). SSFP imaging returned larger end diastolic and end systolic volumes and smaller left ventricular masses than FLASH imaging at 7T, and at the lower field strengths (P<0.05 for each parameter). However, univariate general linear model analysis with fixed effects for sequence and field strengths found an interaction between imaging sequence and field strength (P=0.03), with a smaller difference in volumes and mass measurements between SSFP and FLASH imaging at 7T than 1.5T and 3T. SSFP and FLASH cine imaging at 7T is technically feasible and provides valid assessment of cardiac volumes and mass compared with CMR imaging at 1.5T and 3T field strengths. Copyright (c) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 34
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Feasibility of ultrahigh field (7 Tesla) human cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging to assess cardiac volumes and mass validated against 1.5 T and 3T field strengths
    Suttie J.J.
    DeLaBarre L.
    Pitcher A.
    van de Moortele P.-F.
    Dass S.
    Snyder C.J.
    Francis J.M.
    Metzger G.J.
    Weale P.
    Ugurbil K.
    Robson M.D.
    Neubauer S.
    Vaughan T.
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 13 (Suppl 1)
  • [2] Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Placenta at 1.5 Tesla (T).
    Wright, Caroline
    Morris, David M.
    Baker, Philip N.
    Crocker, Ian P.
    Gowland, Penny A.
    Parker, Geoff J.
    Sibley, Colin P.
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2009, 16 (03) : 348A - 348A
  • [3] In Vivo Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Human Brain at 7 T and 1.5 T
    Hamhaber, Uwe
    Klatt, Dieter
    Papazoglou, Sebastian
    Hollmann, Maurice
    Stadler, Joerg
    Sack, Ingolf
    Bernarding, Johannes
    Braun, Juergen
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2010, 32 (03) : 577 - 583
  • [4] Radiofrequency heating of retained cardiac leads during magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T and 3 T
    Nguyen, Bach T.
    Bhusal, Bhumi
    Fawcett, Kate
    Golestanirad, Laleh
    2021 43RD ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE & BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2021, : 4986 - 4989
  • [5] Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in small rodents using clinical 1.5 T and 3.0 T scanners
    Gilson, Wesley D.
    Kraitchman, Dara L.
    METHODS, 2007, 43 (01) : 35 - 45
  • [6] Real-time cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 1.5 T using balanced SSFP and 40 ms resolution
    Dirk Voit
    Shuo Zhang
    Christina Unterberg-Buchwald
    Jan M Sohns
    Joachim Lotz
    Jens Frahm
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 15
  • [7] Real-time cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 1.5 T using balanced SSFP and 40 ms resolution
    Voit, Dirk
    Zhang, Shuo
    Unterberg-Buchwald, Christina
    Sohns, Jan M.
    Lotz, Joachim
    Frahm, Jens
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2013, 15
  • [8] Artefacts in 1.5 Tesla and 3 Tesla cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with leadless cardiac pacemakers
    Daniel Kiblboeck
    Christian Reiter
    Juergen Kammler
    Pierre Schmit
    Hermann Blessberger
    Joerg Kellermair
    Franz Fellner
    Clemens Steinwender
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 20
  • [9] Myocardial iron assessment by T1 cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 1.5 Tesla
    Mohammed H Alam
    Taigang He
    Gillian C Smith
    Arun J Baksi
    Ricardo Wage
    Peter Drivas
    Yanqiu Feng
    David Firmin
    Dudley J Pennell
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 16 (Suppl 1)
  • [10] Artefacts in 1.5 Tesla and 3 Tesla cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with leadless cardiac pacemakers
    Kiblboeck, Daniel
    Reiter, Christian
    Kammler, Juergen
    Schmit, Pierre
    Blessberger, Hermann
    Kellermair, Joerg
    Fellner, Franz
    Steinwender, Clemens
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2018, 20