Randomised methodology development study to investigate plaque removal efficacy of manual toothbrushes

被引:6
|
作者
Grimaldi, Roberta [1 ]
Yonel, Zehra [2 ]
Chapple, Iain [3 ]
Butler, Andrew [1 ]
Hall, Claire [3 ]
Reinbold, Klaus [4 ]
Mantzourani, Maria [1 ]
机构
[1] GSK Consumer Healthcare, St Georges Ave, Weybridge KT13 0DE, Surrey, England
[2] Univ Birmingham, Coll Med & Dent Sci, Inst Clin Sci, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[3] Raven Lane Consulting Ltd, Wirral, Merseyside, England
[4] GSK Consumer Healthcare, Oral & Skin Hlth, St Georges Ave, Weybridge KT13 0DE, Surrey, England
关键词
Dental plaque control; Dental plaque index; Toothbrushing efficacy; In vivo; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103830
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate plaque removal efficacy of toothbrushes to guide clinical model development. Methods: This single-centre, randomised, controlled, examiner-blind, method development study included 80 healthy participants. Over 28 days, participants brushed twice-daily using a fluoride toothpaste and one of four marketed toothbrushes: Toothbrushes A (compact head) and B (regular head): medium-hard; flat trim; end rounded bristles; Toothbrush C: medium-hard; end-rounded bristles; silky, tapered filaments; compact head; Toothbrush D: soft; tapered filaments; compact head. Supra-gingival plaque removal was evaluated immediately after single brushing events (Days 0, 7, 28, at study centre) and following 7and 28-days' home use via Rustogi modified Navy Plaque Index (RPI) and Turesky modified Quigley Hein Plaque Index (TPI). Results: All toothbrushes provided significant plaque removal after single-brushing events with change from Day 0 pre-brushing scores on RPI ranging from-0.10 to-0.16 (p<.0001) and on TPI ranging from-0.61 to-0.89 (p<.0001). Toothbrushes A and B showed significant (p<.05) pre-brushing RPI/TPI plaque reductions after 7(-0.04/-0.06, respectively for RPI;-0.16/-0.20, respectively for TPI) and 28-days (-0.04/-0.03, respectively for RPI;-0.20/-0.11, respectively for TPI) use versus Day 0 pre-brushing (except Toothbrush B, Day 28, nonsignificant TPI). There were no significant differences with Toothbrush C. Toothbrush D TPI was significantly lower at both timepoints versus Day 0 pre-brushing (p<.05). Study toothbrushes were generally well-tolerated. Conclusion: The observations from this study showed how various aspects of a study design could impact toothbrushes performance. These data will inform the design of future clinical studies of plaque removal efficacy using manual toothbrushes. Clinical Significance Statement: Regular effective oral hygiene can help prevent and treat gingivitis, principally via twice-daily mechanical cleaning with a toothbrush. Data generated from this methodology development study will help to identify the key aspects which impact toothbrushes' performance and understand which one would be more suitable to answer questions of scientific interest. This study provides useful information for the design of future clinical trials to assess plaque removal efficacy of manual toothbrushes and generate results to inform clinical recommendations.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Efficacy of removal of sucrose-supplemented interproximal plaque by electric toothbrushes in an in vitro model
    Hope, CK
    Petrie, A
    Wilson, M
    APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2005, 71 (02) : 1114 - 1116
  • [42] Comparison of powered and manual toothbrushes for plaque removal by 4-to 5-year-old children
    Silverman, J
    Rosivack, RG
    Matheson, PB
    Houpt, MI
    PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2004, 26 (03) : 225 - 230
  • [43] A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF PLAQUE REMOVING EFFICIENCY USING ROTARY ELECTRIC AND MANUAL TOOTHBRUSHES
    PREBER, H
    YLIPAA, V
    BERGSTROM, J
    RYDEN, H
    SWEDISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 1991, 15 (05) : 229 - 234
  • [44] Efficacy of plaque removal and learning effect of a powered and a manual toothbrush
    Lazarescu, D
    Boccaneala, S
    Illiescu, A
    De Boever, JA
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2003, 30 (08) : 726 - 731
  • [45] Efficacy of Two Different Toothbrushes on Plaque Control: A Randomized Clinical Study
    Pampolin de Carvalho, Marcia Aparecida
    Florio, Flavia Marta
    dos Santos Pereiras, Silvio Antonio
    Antunes Martin, Ana Cristina
    Cardoso Silveira, Elton Jose
    Saba-Chujfi, Eduardo
    PESQUISA BRASILEIRA EM ODONTOPEDIATRIA E CLINICA INTEGRADA, 2019, 19 (01):
  • [46] Site-based plaque removal efficacy of four branded toothbrushes and the effect of dental floss in interproximal plaque removal: A randomized examiner-blind controlled study
    Ashwath, Balachandran
    Vijayalakshmi, Rajaraman
    Arun, Dayanathi
    Kumar, Vasanth
    QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 45 (07): : 577 - 584
  • [47] Randomised clinical study of plaque removal efficacy of an electric toothbrush in primary and mixed dentition
    Davidovich, Esti
    Ccahuana-Vasquez, Renzo A.
    Timm, Hans
    Grender, Julie
    Zini, Avi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2021, 31 (05) : 657 - 663
  • [48] Tooth brushing motion patterns with manual and powered toothbrushes—a randomised video observation study
    C. Ganss
    R. Duran
    T. Winterfeld
    N. Schlueter
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2018, 22 : 715 - 720
  • [49] Relative plaque removal of three toothbrushes in a nine-period crossover study
    Terézhalmy, GT
    Bartizek, RD
    Biesbrock, AR
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2005, 76 (12) : 2230 - 2235
  • [50] Comparison of the interproximal plaque removal efficacy of two powered toothbrushes using in vitro oral biofilms
    Hope, CK
    Wilson, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2002, 15 : 7B - 11B