Reclassification of Glioblastoma Multiforme According to the 2021 World Health Organization Classification of Central Nervous System Tumors: A Single Institution Report and Practical Significance

被引:30
|
作者
Stoyanov, George S. [1 ]
Lyutfi, Emran [2 ]
Georgieva, Reneta [3 ]
Georgiev, Radoslav [4 ]
Dzhenkov, Deyan L. [1 ]
Petkova, Lilyana [1 ]
Ivanov, Borislav D. [5 ]
Kaprelyan, Ara [2 ]
Ghenev, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Varna, Gen & Clin Pathol, Forens Med & Deontol, Varna, Bulgaria
[2] Med Univ Varna, Neurol & Neurosci, Varna, Bulgaria
[3] Med Univ Varna, Fac Med, Varna, Bulgaria
[4] Med Univ Varna, Imaging Diagnost Intervent Radiol & Radiotherapy, Varna, Bulgaria
[5] Med Univ Varna, Clin Med Sci, Varna, Bulgaria
关键词
demographics; who; 2021; survival pattern; mgmt; idh; glioblastoma multiforme; PROGNOSIS;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.21822
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction The 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) has introduced significant changes to tumor taxonomy. One of the most significant changes in the isolation of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant forms of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) into separate entities, as well as no longer allowing for entries to be classified as not otherwise specified (NOS). As a result, this entity now includes only the most aggressive adult-type tumors. As such, established prognostic factors no longer apply, as they now form the criteria of different disease entries or have been established based on a mixed cohort. Herein, we aimed to reclassify glioblastoma cases diagnosed per the 2016 WHO tumors of the CNS classification into the 2021 WHO tumors of the CNS classification and establish a patient survival pattern based on age, gender, tumor location, and size as well as tumor O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) mutation. Materials and methods A retrospective, non-clinical approach was utilized. Biopsy specimens of adults diagnosed with GBM, WHO grade 4, NOS in the period February 2018-February 2021 were reevaluated. The data regarding the patient's gender and age were withdrawn from the medical documentation. Immunohistochemistry was performed with mouse monoclonal anti-IDH R132H and rabbit polyclonal anti-MGMT. Radiology data on tumor location and size were pulled from the radiology repository. Data were statistically analyzed for significance, using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, with a 95% confidence interval and p<0.05 defined as significant. Results A total of 58 cases fit the set criteria, with eight of them (13.7%) harboring an IDH R132H mutation and were hence reclassified as diffuse astrocytoma IDH-mutant, WHO CNS grade 4. The cases that retained their GBM classification included n=28 males and n=22 females, a male to female ratio of 1.27:1, and a mean age of 65.3 years (range 43-86 years). The MGMT mutational status revealed a total of n=17 positive cases (35%), while the remaining cases were negative. No hemispheric predilection could be established. Lobar predilection was as follows: temporal (37.78%), parietal (28.89%), frontal (24.44%), and occipital (8.89%). The mean tumor size measured on neuroradiology across the cohort was 50.51 mm (range 20-76 mm). The median survival across cases was 255.96 days (8.41 months), with a range of 18-1150 days (0.59-37.78 months). No statistical correlation could be established between patient survival and gender, hemispheric location, lobar location, and tumor size. A significant difference in survival was established only when comparing the 41-50 age groups to the 71-80 and 81-90 age groups and MGMT positive versus negative tumors (p=0.0001). Conclusion From a practical standpoint, the changes implemented in the new classification of CNS tumors define GBM as the most aggressive adult type of tumor. Based on their significantly more favorable prognosis, the reclassification of IDH mutant forms of astrocytomas has had little epidemiological impact on this relatively common malignancy but has significantly underlined the dismal prognosis. The changes have also led to MGMT promoter methylation status being the only significant prognostic factor for patient survival in clinical use, based on its prediction for response to temozolomide therapy in this nosological unit clinically presenting when it has already reached immense size.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Impact of epidemiological characteristics of supratentorial gliomas in adults brought about by the 2016 world health organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system
    Jiang, Haihui
    Cui, Yong
    Wang, Junmei
    Lin, Song
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (12) : 20354 - 20361
  • [42] Lymphoma in Taiwan: Review of 1347 neoplasms from a single institution according to the 2016 Revision of the World Health Organization Classification
    Chuang, Shih-Sung
    Chen, Shang-Wen
    Chang, Sheng-Tsung
    Kuo, Yu-Ting
    JOURNAL OF THE FORMOSAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 116 (08) : 620 - 625
  • [44] The 2007 revised world health organization (WHO) classification of tumours of the central nervous system: Newly codified entities
    Fuller, Gregory N.
    Scheithauer, Bernd W.
    BRAIN PATHOLOGY, 2007, 17 (03) : 304 - 307
  • [45] The 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumours of the Central Nervous System: what the paediatric neuroradiologist needs to know
    Chhabda, Sahil
    Carney, Olivia
    D'Arco, Felice
    Jacques, Thomas S.
    Mankad, Kshitij
    QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2016, 6 (05) : 486 - 489
  • [46] Renal neoplasms in younger adults - Analysis of 112 tumors from a single institution according to the new 2004 world health organization classification and 2002 American joint committee on cancer staging system
    Cao, Y
    Paner, GP
    Perry, KT
    Flanigan, RC
    Campbell, SC
    Picken, MM
    ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2005, 129 (04) : 487 - 491
  • [47] Proton MR spectroscopy shows improved performance to segregate high-grade astrocytoma subgroups when defined with the new 2021 World Health Organization classification of central nervous system tumors
    Majos, Carles
    Pons-Escoda, Albert
    Naval, Pablo
    Guell, Anna
    Lucas, Anna
    Vidal, Noemi
    Cos, Monica
    Bruna, Jordi
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2024, 34 (04) : 2174 - 2182
  • [48] Proton MR spectroscopy shows improved performance to segregate high-grade astrocytoma subgroups when defined with the new 2021 World Health Organization classification of central nervous system tumors
    Carles Majós
    Albert Pons-Escoda
    Pablo Naval
    Anna Güell
    Anna Lucas
    Noemí Vidal
    Mònica Cos
    Jordi Bruna
    European Radiology, 2024, 34 : 2174 - 2182
  • [49] CONVENTIONAL AND MOLECULAR CYTOGENETIC ANALYSES OF NEUROEPITHELIAL CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM TUMORS: THE FIRST REPORT FROM A SINGLE INSTITUTION IN ARGENTINA
    Cocce, Mariela
    Lubieniecki, Fabiana
    Alderete, Daniel
    Gallego, Marta
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2010, 55 (05) : 914 - 914
  • [50] World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System 5th Edition (WHO CNS5): What's new?
    Mahajan, Swati
    Suri, Vaishali
    Sahu, Saumya
    Sharma, Mehar C.
    Sarkar, Chitra
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY AND MICROBIOLOGY, 2022, 65 (05) : 5 - 13