Reclassification of Glioblastoma Multiforme According to the 2021 World Health Organization Classification of Central Nervous System Tumors: A Single Institution Report and Practical Significance

被引:30
|
作者
Stoyanov, George S. [1 ]
Lyutfi, Emran [2 ]
Georgieva, Reneta [3 ]
Georgiev, Radoslav [4 ]
Dzhenkov, Deyan L. [1 ]
Petkova, Lilyana [1 ]
Ivanov, Borislav D. [5 ]
Kaprelyan, Ara [2 ]
Ghenev, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Varna, Gen & Clin Pathol, Forens Med & Deontol, Varna, Bulgaria
[2] Med Univ Varna, Neurol & Neurosci, Varna, Bulgaria
[3] Med Univ Varna, Fac Med, Varna, Bulgaria
[4] Med Univ Varna, Imaging Diagnost Intervent Radiol & Radiotherapy, Varna, Bulgaria
[5] Med Univ Varna, Clin Med Sci, Varna, Bulgaria
关键词
demographics; who; 2021; survival pattern; mgmt; idh; glioblastoma multiforme; PROGNOSIS;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.21822
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction The 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) has introduced significant changes to tumor taxonomy. One of the most significant changes in the isolation of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant forms of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) into separate entities, as well as no longer allowing for entries to be classified as not otherwise specified (NOS). As a result, this entity now includes only the most aggressive adult-type tumors. As such, established prognostic factors no longer apply, as they now form the criteria of different disease entries or have been established based on a mixed cohort. Herein, we aimed to reclassify glioblastoma cases diagnosed per the 2016 WHO tumors of the CNS classification into the 2021 WHO tumors of the CNS classification and establish a patient survival pattern based on age, gender, tumor location, and size as well as tumor O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) mutation. Materials and methods A retrospective, non-clinical approach was utilized. Biopsy specimens of adults diagnosed with GBM, WHO grade 4, NOS in the period February 2018-February 2021 were reevaluated. The data regarding the patient's gender and age were withdrawn from the medical documentation. Immunohistochemistry was performed with mouse monoclonal anti-IDH R132H and rabbit polyclonal anti-MGMT. Radiology data on tumor location and size were pulled from the radiology repository. Data were statistically analyzed for significance, using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, with a 95% confidence interval and p<0.05 defined as significant. Results A total of 58 cases fit the set criteria, with eight of them (13.7%) harboring an IDH R132H mutation and were hence reclassified as diffuse astrocytoma IDH-mutant, WHO CNS grade 4. The cases that retained their GBM classification included n=28 males and n=22 females, a male to female ratio of 1.27:1, and a mean age of 65.3 years (range 43-86 years). The MGMT mutational status revealed a total of n=17 positive cases (35%), while the remaining cases were negative. No hemispheric predilection could be established. Lobar predilection was as follows: temporal (37.78%), parietal (28.89%), frontal (24.44%), and occipital (8.89%). The mean tumor size measured on neuroradiology across the cohort was 50.51 mm (range 20-76 mm). The median survival across cases was 255.96 days (8.41 months), with a range of 18-1150 days (0.59-37.78 months). No statistical correlation could be established between patient survival and gender, hemispheric location, lobar location, and tumor size. A significant difference in survival was established only when comparing the 41-50 age groups to the 71-80 and 81-90 age groups and MGMT positive versus negative tumors (p=0.0001). Conclusion From a practical standpoint, the changes implemented in the new classification of CNS tumors define GBM as the most aggressive adult type of tumor. Based on their significantly more favorable prognosis, the reclassification of IDH mutant forms of astrocytomas has had little epidemiological impact on this relatively common malignancy but has significantly underlined the dismal prognosis. The changes have also led to MGMT promoter methylation status being the only significant prognostic factor for patient survival in clinical use, based on its prediction for response to temozolomide therapy in this nosological unit clinically presenting when it has already reached immense size.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Usefulness of positron emission tomography for differentiating gliomas according to the 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system
    Takei, Hiroaki
    Shinoda, Jun
    Ikuta, Soko
    Maruyama, Takashi
    Muragaki, Yoshihiro
    Kawasaki, Tomohiro
    Ikegame, Yuka
    Okada, Makoto
    Ito, Takeshi
    Asano, Yoshitaka
    Yokoyama, Kazutoshi
    Nakayama, Noriyuki
    Yano, Hirohito
    Iwama, Toru
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 133 (04) : 1010 - 1019
  • [22] World Health Organization 2021 Classification of Central Nervous System Tumors and Implications for Therapy for Adult-Type Gliomas A Review
    Berger, Tamar R.
    Wen, Patrick Y.
    Lang-Orsini, Melanie
    Chukwueke, Ugonma N.
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2022, 8 (10) : 1493 - 1501
  • [23] 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Central Nervous System Tumors: An Era of Molecular Biology
    Hoshide, Reid
    Jandial, Rahul
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 94 : 561 - 562
  • [24] Clinical Laboratory Testing Practices in Diffuse Gliomas Prior to Publication of 2021 World Health Organization Classification of Central Nervous System Tumors
    Ramkissoon, Shakti H.
    Fernandes, Helen
    Lopez-Terrada, Dolores H.
    Hameed, Meera R.
    Trembath, Dimitri G.
    Bridge, Julia A.
    Lindeman, Neal I.
    Souers, Rhona J.
    Vasalos, Patricia
    Brat, Daniel J.
    Moncur, Joel T.
    ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2023, 147 (05) : 518 - 524
  • [25] The 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumours of the central nervous system
    Villa, Chiara
    Miquel, Catherine
    Mosses, Dominic
    Bernier, Michele
    Di Stefano, Anna Luisa
    PRESSE MEDICALE, 2018, 47 (11-12): : E187 - E200
  • [26] The Evolving World Health Organization (WHO) classification of tumors of the central nervous system (CNS): Challenges and opportunities
    Sarkar, Chitra
    Uppin, Megha
    Mahadevan, Anita
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY AND MICROBIOLOGY, 2022, 65 (05) : 2 - 4
  • [27] The fifth edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: Implications for cancer registries
    Hoogendijk, Raoull
    van der Lugt, Jasper
    Hoving, Eelco
    Kremer, Leontien
    Visser, Otto
    Wesseling, Pieter
    van Vuurden, Dannis
    Karim-Kos, Henrike
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2022, 24 (11) : 1811 - 1814
  • [28] Simple approach for the histomolecular diagnosis of central nervous system gliomas based on 2021 World Health Organization Classification
    Kurdi, Maher
    Moshref, Rana H.
    Katib, Yousef
    Faizo, Eyad
    Najjar, Ahmed A.
    Bahakeem, Basem
    Bamaga, Ahmed K.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 13 (07): : 567 - 576
  • [29] The New World Health Organization Classification of Central Nervous System Tumors: What Can the Neuroradiologist Really Say?
    Osborn, A. G.
    Salzman, K. L.
    Thurnher, M. M.
    Rees, J. H.
    Castillo, M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2012, 33 (05) : 795 - 802
  • [30] Shedding Light on the 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System in the Era of Radiomics and Radiogenomics
    Colen, Rivka R.
    Hassan, Islam
    Elshafeey, Nabil
    Zinn, Pascal O.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2016, 24 (04) : 741 - 749