Knowledge Assessment: Squeezing Information From Multiple-Choice Testing

被引:2
|
作者
Nickerson, Raymond S. [1 ]
Butler, Susan F. [1 ]
Carlin, Michael T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, Dept Psychol, Medford, MA 02155 USA
[2] Rider Univ, Dept Psychol, Lawrenceville, NJ 08648 USA
关键词
knowledge assessment; multiple-choice testing; confidence assessment; STRATEGIC REGULATION; DONT KNOW; PERSONAL PROBABILITIES; IMMEDIATE FEEDBACK; NUMBER-RIGHT; TEST-SCORES; VALIDITY; MEMORY; DISTRACTORS; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1037/xap0000041
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Knowledge assessment via testing can be viewed from two vantage points: that of the test administrator and that of the test taker. From the administrator's perspective, the objective is to discover what an individual knows about a domain of interest. From that of the test taker, the challenge is to reveal what one knows. In this article we describe a procedure for administering and scoring multiple-choice tests that satisfies both of these objectives and we present experimental data that demonstrate its effectiveness. The method allows test takers to provide specific information about their confidence that each alternative for an item is the correct answer and makes guessing not only unnecessary but detrimental. From this information the administrator can derive measures of both knowledge and confidence, which, we argue, provides better estimates than systems that do not allow measurement of partial knowledge. The use of such measures for purposes of evaluation both of individual test takers' knowledge of a subject of interest and of the effectiveness of instruction with respect to that subject is discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 177
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] MULTIPLE-CHOICE
    PAGLIA, C
    NEW REPUBLIC, 1995, 213 (20) : 4 - 4
  • [42] An Evidence-Based Approach to Constructing Multiple-Choice Test Questions for Knowledge Assessment
    Schneid, Stephen D.
    Makhija, Hirsh
    Mandel, Jess
    Kalinowski, Amy
    Davidson, Judy E.
    JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN NURSING, 2024, 55 (06): : 289 - 296
  • [43] Test your ophthalmological knowledge: A multiple-choice questionnaire
    不详
    JOURNAL FRANCAIS D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 1999, 22 (01): : 102 - 103
  • [44] Multiple-choice tests stabilize access to marginal knowledge
    Cantor, Allison D.
    Eslick, Andrea N.
    Marsh, Elizabeth J.
    Bjork, Robert A.
    Bjork, Elizabeth Ligon
    MEMORY & COGNITION, 2015, 43 (02) : 193 - 205
  • [45] Multiple-choice tests stabilize access to marginal knowledge
    Allison D. Cantor
    Andrea N. Eslick
    Elizabeth J. Marsh
    Robert A. Bjork
    Elizabeth Ligon Bjork
    Memory & Cognition, 2015, 43 : 193 - 205
  • [46] Creating multiple-choice items for testing student learning
    Haladyna, Thomas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ASSESSMENT TOOLS IN EDUCATION, 2022, 9 : 6 - 18
  • [47] A Case Study on Multiple-Choice Testing in Anatomical Sciences
    Golda, Stephanie DuPont
    ANATOMICAL SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2011, 4 (01) : 44 - 48
  • [48] Guessing, Partial Knowledge, and Misconceptions in Multiple-Choice Tests
    Lau, Paul Ngee Kiong
    Lau, Sie Hoe
    Hong, Kian Sam
    Usop, Hasbee
    EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & SOCIETY, 2011, 14 (04): : 99 - 110
  • [49] Can you beat guessing in multiple-choice testing?
    Mackey, BA
    GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ROUND TABLE ON LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTICS 1999: LANGUAGE IN OUR TIME: BILINGUAL EDUCATION AND OFFICIAL ENGLISH, EBONICS AND STANDARD ENGLISH, IMMIGRATION AND THE UNZ INITIATIVE, 2001, : 59 - 70
  • [50] CHEMISTRY TESTING - BREAKING OUT OF THE MULTIPLE-CHOICE MOLD
    EUBANKS, ID
    PRYDE, LT
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1990, 199 : 192 - CHED