Knowledge Assessment: Squeezing Information From Multiple-Choice Testing

被引:2
|
作者
Nickerson, Raymond S. [1 ]
Butler, Susan F. [1 ]
Carlin, Michael T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, Dept Psychol, Medford, MA 02155 USA
[2] Rider Univ, Dept Psychol, Lawrenceville, NJ 08648 USA
关键词
knowledge assessment; multiple-choice testing; confidence assessment; STRATEGIC REGULATION; DONT KNOW; PERSONAL PROBABILITIES; IMMEDIATE FEEDBACK; NUMBER-RIGHT; TEST-SCORES; VALIDITY; MEMORY; DISTRACTORS; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1037/xap0000041
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Knowledge assessment via testing can be viewed from two vantage points: that of the test administrator and that of the test taker. From the administrator's perspective, the objective is to discover what an individual knows about a domain of interest. From that of the test taker, the challenge is to reveal what one knows. In this article we describe a procedure for administering and scoring multiple-choice tests that satisfies both of these objectives and we present experimental data that demonstrate its effectiveness. The method allows test takers to provide specific information about their confidence that each alternative for an item is the correct answer and makes guessing not only unnecessary but detrimental. From this information the administrator can derive measures of both knowledge and confidence, which, we argue, provides better estimates than systems that do not allow measurement of partial knowledge. The use of such measures for purposes of evaluation both of individual test takers' knowledge of a subject of interest and of the effectiveness of instruction with respect to that subject is discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 177
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Acceptance by undergraduates of the immediate feedback assessment technique for multiple-choice testing
    DiBattista, D
    Mitterer, JO
    Gosse, L
    TEACHING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2004, 9 (01) : 17 - 28
  • [22] Quality assessment of multiple-choice questions
    Akram, Zareena
    Aman, Khaliq
    Waheed, Nomira
    Rahim, Shiekh Kashif
    Hanif, Fouzia
    Abdullah, Zainab
    RAWAL MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2025, 50 (01): : 191 - 194
  • [23] MULTIPLE-CHOICE TESTS - A TOOL IN THE ASSESSING KNOWLEDGE
    Lopes, Ana Paula
    Babo, Lurdes
    Azevedo, Jose
    Torres, Cristina
    4TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE (INTED 2010), 2010, : 256 - 265
  • [24] Validity of multiple-choice format in language testing
    吴雪媚
    校园英语, 2017, (30) : 214 - 214
  • [25] A Baseline for Multiple-Choice Testing in the University Classroom
    Slepkov, A. D.
    Van Bussel, M. L.
    Fitze, K. M.
    Burr, W. S.
    SAGE OPEN, 2021, 11 (02):
  • [26] MULTIPLE-CHOICE ANSWER TO STANDARDIZED TESTING ISSUE
    LANGE, B
    ENGLISH JOURNAL, 1978, 67 (07): : 92 - 94
  • [27] RATIONAL MULTIPLE-CHOICE CLOZE AND PROGRESS TESTING
    HAMMERLY, H
    COLHOUN, ER
    HISPANIA-A JOURNAL DEVOTED TO THE TEACHING OF SPANISH AND PORTUGUESE, 1984, 67 (03): : 411 - 415
  • [28] Multiple-choice testing as a desirable difficulty in the classroom
    Bjork, Elizabeth Ligon
    Little, Jeri L.
    Storm, Benjamin C.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2014, 3 (03) : 165 - 170
  • [29] MULTIPLE-CHOICE TESTING - QUESTION AND RESPONSE POSITION
    BRESNOCK, AE
    GRAVES, PE
    WHITE, N
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC EDUCATION, 1989, 20 (03): : 239 - 245
  • [30] The positive and negative consequences of multiple-choice testing
    Roediger, HL
    Marsh, EJ
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2005, 31 (05) : 1155 - 1159